@misc{Łaniewski_Aleksander_Czy_2018,
 author={Łaniewski, Aleksander},
 editor={Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences},
 copyright={Creative Commons Attribution BY-ND 4.0 license},
 address={Warszawa},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2018},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The article is a polemics with theses presented in the book by Wiktor Marzec Rebelia i reakcja. Rewolucja 1905 roku i plebejskie doświadczenie polityczne [Rebellion and Reaction. The 1905 Revolution and Plebeian Political Experience]. Undoubtedly, the book which is a new and interesting voice in the discussion of problems of revolutionary events at the beginning of the 20th century, according to the reviewer, is imbued with Anglo-Saxon methodology, and does not add any new factual contribution to the literature on the subject. Focusing on random fragments of the 1905 Revolution and ignoring certain socio-political forces is not enough to discuss the plebeian political experience and to give a comprehensive description of Polish political modernity.},
 title={Czy metodologia powinna zaćmiewać faktografię? Nowe spojrzenie na rewolucję 1905 roku},
 type={Text},
 URL={http://rcin.org.pl/Content/72252/PDF/WA303_94720_A453-SzDR-53-2_Laniewski.pdf},
 volume={53},
 number={2},
 journal={Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej},
 publisher={Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk},
 keywords={Poland - history - Revolution, 1905-1907 - social aspects, social movements - Poland - 1870-1914, Kingdom of Poland (1815-1830), Grodno Governorate (1801-1915), Russian Empire, socialism, Jewish Labor Bund - history, anarchism, National Democracy (Endecja), history - methodology},
}