@misc{Szmidt_Eulalia._Autor_Analysis_2001, author={Szmidt, Eulalia. Autor and Kacprzyk, Janusz (1947– ). Autor}, copyright={Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license}, address={Warszawa}, journal={Raport Badawczy = Research Report}, howpublished={online}, year={2001}, publisher={Instytut Badań Systemowych. Polska Akademia Nauk}, publisher={Systems Research Institute. Polish Academy of Sciences}, language={eng}, abstract={We analyse the extent of agreement in a group of experts (individuals) in a case when individual testimonies are intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, as opposed to fuzzy preference relations commonly employed. Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, that in addition to a membership degree (from [0,1]) include a hestitation margin (concerning the membership degee), can be better reflect the very imprecision of testimonies (expressing preferences) of the individuals during the consensus reaching process. Our solution is based on calculating distances between intuitionistic fuzzy preferences. An extent of a group agreement is given by a number from interval [0,1], where 0 means consensus (in a traditional sense), 1 means full disagreement.}, title={Analysis of agreement in a group of experts via distances between intuitionistic fuzzy preferences}, type={Text}, keywords={Intuicjonistyczne zbiory rozmyte, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation, Intuicjonistyczne rozmyte relacje preferencji, Group agreement, Distance from consensus, Relacja preferencji}, }