@misc{Szmidt_Eulalia._Autor_Intuitionistic_2001,
 author={Szmidt, Eulalia. Autor and Kacprzyk, Janusz (1947– ). Autor},
 copyright={Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license},
 address={Warszawa},
 journal={Raport Badawczy = Research Report},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2001},
 publisher={Instytut Badań Systemowych. Polska Akademia Nauk},
 publisher={Systems Research Institute. Polish Academy of Sciences},
 language={eng},
 abstract={We follow the concept of a fuzzy majority introduced by Kacprzyk (1984, 1985, 1986, 1987), Fedrizzi (1988), Kacprzyk and Fedrizzi (1986, 1988, 1989). The proposed consensus measure expresses a degree to which, say, „most of the important individuals agree as to almost all of the relevant options”. Individual testimonies are assumed to be individual intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations that, as opposed to ordinary fuzzy preference relations, can better reflect the fact that during the consensus reaching proccess individuals can be, first, unsure as to their peferences, and second, can change them. We obtain new interval valued measures of consensus meant as, on the one hand, reflecting a possible hestitation of individuals, and on the other hand, providing a best and worst possible result.},
 title={Intuitionistic fuzzy relations and measures of consensus},
 type={Text},
 keywords={Degree of consensus, Stopień konsensusu, Intuicjonistyczne zbiory rozmyte, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Consensus, Konsensus, Linguistically quantified statements},
}