@misc{Disney_R._H._L._Sciadoceridae_2001,
 author={Disney, R. H. L. and Polska Akademia Nauk. Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii},
 volume={44},
 number={2},
 copyright={Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license},
 address={Warszawa},
 journal={Fragmenta Faunistica},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2001},
 publisher={Museum and Institute of Zoology, PAS},
 language={eng},
 abstract={TONNOIR’s (1926) assignment of Sciadocera rufomaculata WHITE to the Phoridaeis supported and SCHMITZ’s (1929) transfer of it and Archiphora patagonica SCHMITZ to a separate family, Sciadoceridae, is rejected. The growing number of fossils bridging the gap between Sciadoceridae and Phoridae support the view that the sciadocerids are merely an assortment of Phoridae that share some plesiomorphic features.},
 type={Text},
 title={Sciadoceridae (Diptera) reconsidered},
 URL={http://rcin.org.pl/Content/54262/PDF/WA058_61114_P256-T44_Fragm-Faun-Nr-2.pdf},
 keywords={Sciadoceridae, Archiphora patagonica, Sciadocera rufomaculata, classification, South America, Australia, Tasmania Island, systematic revision, insects, flies, Diptera, Insecta, phorid flies, Phoridae, Brachycera, brachyceran flies},
}