Object

Title: Całościowe ujęcie krajobrazu, wybrane podejścia i problemy badawcze = The holistic conceptualisation of the landscape, selected approaches and research problems

Subtitle:

Przegląd Geograficzny T. 91 z. 3 (2019)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Abstract:

The aim of this theoretical work is to systemize and synthesize selected issues related to the approach to landscape. Presented here are: 1) selected holistic approaches to the cultural landscape, with particular attention paid to the added value of the current approach; 2) the rationale behind the devastated landscape being assigned to a separate category, rather than considered under the “cultural landscape” heading – and the essence of the associated typological separateness, as a logical inference from the interaction of the anthropogenic and natural systems in the formation of landscape properties, which emphasises the disappearance of cultural patterns as a devastated landscape is created; 3) an outline of research themes pertaining to landscape connectivity and permeability, as well as inter-penetration, with parallel depiction of substantive premises underpinning a somewhat different treatment of these properties. Given the progressive withdrawal of the term natural landscape, and also taking account of the category of cultural landscape and the level of anthropogenic pressure, the authors propose the division of the landscape into 3 categories: primary, cultural and devastated. This denotes an intentional separation and distinguishing of the devastated landscape, with the addition of this category justified in terms of the disappearance of cultural patterns that the formation of such a landscape entails.

References:

Antrop M., 1997, The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning: the example of Flanders Region, Landscape Urban Planning, 38, s. 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00027-3 ; Antrop M., Brandt J., Loupa R.I., Pinto-Correia T., Padoa-Schioppa E., Porter J., Van Eetvelde V., 2013, How landscape ecology can promote the development of sustainable landscapes in Europe - The role of the European Association for Landscape Ecology (IALE Europe) in the 21st century, Landscape Ecology, 28, s. 1641-1647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9914-9 ; Antrop M., Van Eetvelde V., 2008, Mechanisms of recent landscape transformation, [w:] U. Mander, C. Brebbia; J.F. Martin-Duque (red.), Geoenvironment and landscape revolution, 3, WIT Press, Southampton, s. 183-192. https://doi.org/10.2495/GEO080181 ; Antrop M., Van Eetvelde V., 2017, Landscape Perspectives, The Holistic Nature of Landscape, Landscape Perspectives. Landscape Series, 23, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1183-6 ; Antrop M., 2000, Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe, Landscape Ecology, 15, 3, s. 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008151109252 ; Arnot C., Fisher P., 2007, Mapping the ecotone with fuzzy sets, [w:] A. Morris, S. Kokhan (red.), Geographic uncertainty in environmental security, Springer, Dordrecht, s. 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6438-8_2 ; Bell S., 1999, Landscape. Pattern, perception and process, Taylor and Francis Group, London. ; Bennett A.F., 2003, Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2004.FR.1.en ; Bennett G., 2004, Integrating biodiversity conservation and sustainable use: lessons learned from ecological networks, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ; Beunen R., Opdam P., 2011, When landscape planning becomes landscape governance, what happens to the science?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 4, s. 324-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.018 ; Bishop I.D., 2011, Landscape planning is not a game: Should it be?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 4, s. 390-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.003 ; Bogdanowski J., 1976, Kompozycja i planowanie w architekturze krajobrazu, Wydawnictwo Ossolineum, Wrocław-Kraków. ; Borzyszkowski J., Bidłasik M., 2016, Mikroregiony fizycznogeograficzne Polski: Kotlina Sandomierska, Pogórze Środkowobeskidzkie, Beskidy Środkowe i Wschodnie, Płaskowyż Sańsko-Dniestrzański, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa. ; Chmielewski T.J., 1988, Regionalne systemy obszarów chronionych - problemy funkcjonowania przyrody i gospodarki, [w:] E. Wysocka (red.), Problemy tworzenia i zagospodarowania systemu obszarów chronionych w Polsce środkowo-wschodniej i na Ukrainie, Materiały z Konferencji Naukowej w Zamościu, 21-23 września 1988 r. ; Chmielewski T.J., 2012, Systemy krajobrazowe: struktura, funkcjonowanie, planowanie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa. ; Chmielewski T.J., Chmielewski S., Kulak A., 2018, Wpływ bezładu przestrzennego na krajobrazowe systemy ekologiczne, [w:] A. Kowalewski, T. Markowski, P. Śleszyński, Koszty chaosu przestrzennego, Studia Komitetu Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN, 182, Warszawa, s. 317-340. ; Chmielewski T.J., Kolejko M., 2014, Problemy zarządzania siecią obszarów chronionych w aspekcie ochrony łączności ekologicznej w Polsce, [w:] Z. Mirek, A. Nikel (red.), Ochrona przyrody w Polsce wobec współczesnych wyzwań cywilizacyjnych, Wydawnictwo Komitetu Ochrony Przyrody PAN, Kraków, s. 49-64. ; Chmielewski T.J., Myga-Piątek U., Solon J., 2015, Typologia aktualnych krajobrazów Polski, Przegląd Geograficzny, 87, 3, s. 377-408. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2015.3.0 ; Claval P.L., 2004, The languages of rural landscapes, [w] H. Palang, H. Sooväli, M. Antrop, S. Setten (red.), European rural landscapes: Persistence and change in a globalising environment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, s. 11-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48512-1_2 ; Colléony A., Prévota A.C., Jalme M.S., Clayton S., 2017, What kind of landscape management can counteract the extinction of experience?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 159, s. 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.010 ; Council of Europe, 2000, European Landscape Convention, European, Treaty Series - No. 176, Florence. ; de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L.G., Willemen L., 2010, Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision-making, Ecological Complexity, 7, 3, s. 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 ; Degórska B., 2009, Sieć stabilności ekologicznej jako ważny czynnik zrównoważonego rozwoju dużego miasta (na przykładzie Krakowa), [w:] W. Jędrzejewski, D. Ławreszuk (red.), Ochrona łączności ekologicznej w Polsce: Wdrażanie koncepcji korytarzy ekologicznych w Polsce, Zakład Badania Ssaków PAN, Białowieża, s. 162-170. ; Degórska B., 2012, Spatial growth of urbanised land within the Warsaw Metropolitan Area in the first decade of the 21st century, Geographia Polonica, 85, 3, s. 77-96. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2012.3.19 ; Degórska B., 2015, Transformacja krajobrazu wschodnich Kujaw w kontekście zmian użytkowania ziemi i osadnictwa (1770-1970), Sedno Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa. ; Degórska B., 2017, Urbanizacja przestrzenna terenów wiejskich na obszarze metropolitalnym Warszawy: Kontekst ekologiczno-krajobrazowy, Prace Geograficzne, 262, Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, Warszawa. ; Degórska B., Degórski M., 2017, Green infrastructure as a very important quality factor in urban areas - Warsaw case study, Europa XXI, 32, s. 51-70. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2017.32.4 ; Degórski M., 2003, Some aspects of multifunctional landscape character in the interdisciplinary environmental study, [w:] K. Helming, H. Wiggering (red.), Sustainable development of Multifunctional Landscapes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, s. 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05240-2_4 ; Degórski M., 2005, Krajobraz jako obiektywna wizualizacja zjawisk i procesów zachodzących w megasystemie środowiska geograficznego, Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego PTG, 4, s. 13-25. ; Degórski M., 2009, Krajobraz jako odbicie przyrodniczych i antropogenicznych procesów zachodzących w magasystemie środowiska geograficznego, [w:] J. Balon (red.), Ekologia Krajobrazu - problemy badawcze i utylitarne, Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, 23, Kraków, s. 53-60. ; Degórski M., Ostaszewska K., Richling A., Solon J., 2014, Współczesne kierunki badań krajobrazowych w kontekście wdrażania Europejskiej Konwencji Krajobrazowej, Przegląd Geograficzny, 86, 3, s. 295-316. https://doi.org/10.7163/PrzG.2014.3.1 ; Diez-Martín F., Sánchez-Yustos P., Gómez-González J., Gómez de la Rúa D., 2008, Earlier Palaeolithic Settlement Patterns: Landscape Archaeology on the River Duero Basin Plateaus (Castilla y León, Spain), Journal of World Prehistory 21, 2, s. 103-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10963-008-9012-0 ; Ďuračiová R., Lieskovský T., Stopková E., Kročková K., 2013, The benefit of fuzzy logic to protection of cultural and historical heritage, Geoinformatics for City Transformation, GIS Ostrava. ; Encyclopedic Dictionary of Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, Potential of the landscape, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. ; Ericson C., 1992, Prehistoric landscape management in the Andean highlands: Raised field agriculture and its environmental impact, Population and Environment, 13, 4, s. 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01271028 ; EUR-Lex, 2007, Access to European Union law, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/pl/TXT/?uri=CELEX: 12007L/TXT. ; Europejska Konwencja Krajobrazowa, 2000, Dziennik Ustaw z 2006 nr 14 poz. 98. ; Farina A., 2000, Landscape ecology in action, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4082-9 ; Farina A., 2012, Landscape ecology in action, Springer, Dordrecht. ; Forman R., Godron M., 1986, Landscape ecology, Wiley, New York. ; Forman R.T.T., 1983, Corridors in a landscape: their ecological structure and function, Ecólogia, 2, 4, Bratislava. ; Fortescue J., 1980, Geochemical flows in landscapes, Environmental geochemistry, a holistic approach, Springer-Verlag New York, s. 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6045-5_8 ; Frydryczak B., 2013, O zakotwiczeniu krajobrazu w kulturze, Prace Kulturoznawcze, 15, s. 161-169. ; Godron A.D., 1987, A review of hierarchical classification, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, ser. A, 150, 2, s. 119-137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2981629 ; Granö J.G., 1952, Régions géographiques et une méthode pour les delimiter, Compte Rendu du XVIè Congrès International de Géographie, Lisbonne 1949. ; Gray M., Wilmers C., Reed S., Merenlender A., 2016, Landscape feature-based permeability models relate to puma occurrence, Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, s. 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.009 ; Gulinck H., 2004, Neo-rurality and multifucntional landscapes, [w:] J. Brandt, H. Vejre (red.), Multifunctional landscapes. Theory, values and history, 1, WIT Press, Southampton, s. 63-74. ; Hägerhall C., Purcella T., Taylor R., 2004, Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, s. 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.004 ; Hedblomab M., Anderssonc E., Borgström S., 2017, Flexible land-use and undefined governance: From threats to potentials in peri-urban landscape planning, Land Use Policy, 62, s. 523-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.022 ; Hettner A., 1927, Geographie, ihre Geschichte, ihr Wesen und ihre Methoden, Breslau. ; Howard P.J., 2011, An Introduction to landscape, Ashgate, Farnham. ; Howard P.J., 1991, Landscapes: The artists' vision, Routledge, London. ; Howey M., 2015, Geospatial landscape permeability modeling for archaeology: A case study of food storage in northern Michigan, Journal of Archaeological Sciences, 64, s. 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.10.007 ; Jędraszko A., 1998, Planowanie środowiska i krajobrazu w Niemczech na przykładzie Stuttgartu, Unia Metropolii Polskich, Warszawa. ; Kamińska K., 2014, Krajobraz kulturowy - nowa relacja człowieka ze światem (nie tylko przyrody), Zeszyty Naukowe Ostrołęckiego Towarzystwa Naukowego 28, s. 239-248. ; Khosravaninezhad S., Zadehbagheri P., Nikdela L., Fathi M., 2011, Metropolises spatial expansion management with special reference to systems related to environmental values, Tehran metropolis as the case study, Procedia Engineering, 21, s. 598-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2055 ; Kistowski M., 2008, Koncepcja równowagi krajobrazu - mity i rzeczywistość, Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, 21, s. 81-91. ; Kondracki J., 1977, Regiony fizycznogeograficzne Polski, Wydawnictwa UW, Warszawa. ; Kosiacka-Beck E., 2016, Przestrzenie przenikania - przenikanie przestrzeni, wieloznaczność zagadnienia, Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego, 32, s. 31-40. ; Lemaire T., 2002, Met open zinnen. Natuur, landschap, aarde, Amsterdam, Ambo. ; Lenhardt P., Schäfer R., Theissinger K., Brühl C., 2013, An expert-based landscape permeability model for assessing the impact of agricultural management on amphibian migration, Basic and Applied Ecology, 14, s. 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.05.004 ; Leyk S., Zimmermann N.E., 2007, Improving land change detection based on uncertain survey maps using fuzzy sets, Landscape Ecology, 22, s. 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9021-2 ; Li B.-L., 2000, Why is the holistic approach becoming so important in landscape ecology?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 1-3, s. 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00078-5 ; Lowenthal D., 1997, European landscape transformations: The rural residue, [w:] P. Groth, T.W. Bressi (red.), Understanding ordinary landscapes, Yale University Press, New Haven, s. 180-188. ; Luc M., Szmańda J.B., 2015, Renaturalized and recultivated landscapes as a result of sustainable landscape management, [w:] M. Luc, U. Somorowska, J. Szmańda (red.), Landscape Analysis and Planning, Springer Geography, Springer, Cham, s. 271-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13527-4_16 ; Mander U., Uuemaa E., 2015, Landscape Planning, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09478-1 ; McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., 2005, The gradient concept of landscape structure, [w] J.A. Wiens, M.R. Moss (red.), Issues in landscape ecology, Studies in landscape ecology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, s. 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614415.013 ; Meiklejohn K., Ament R., Tabor G., 2009, Habitat Corridors & Landscape Connectivity: Clarifying the Terminology, Center for Large Landscape Conservations, Bozeman, s. 1-5. ; Merriam G., 1984, Connectivity: A fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern, [w:] J. Brandt, P. Agger (red.), Proceedings of the 1st international seminar on methodology in landscape ecological research and planning, Roskilde University, Denmark, s. 5-15. ; Mink P.B., Ripy J., Bailey K., Grossardt T.H., 2009, Predictive Archaeological Modeling using GIS - Based Fuzzy Set Estimation: A Case Study in Woodford County, Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Center Faculty and Researcher Publications Paper. ; Moorhouse T., Palmer S., Travis J., Macdonald D., 2014, Hugging the hedges: Might agri-environment manipulations affect landscape permeability for hedgehogs?, Biological Conservation, 176, s. 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.015 ; Munarriz L.A., 2011, The cultural landscape concept, AIBR: Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 6, 1, s. 63-86. https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.060104e ; Myga-Piątek U., 2001, Spór o pojęcie krajobrazu w geografii i dziedzinach pokrewnych, Przegląd Geograficzny 73, 1-2, s.163-176. ; Myga-Piątek U., 2012, Krajobraz kulturowy. Aspekty ewolucyjne i typologiczne, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice. ; Myga-Piątek U., 2014, Metody oceny walorów i zagrożeń krajobrazów kulturowych Polski. Perspektywa Europejskiej Konwencji Krajobrazowej. Samorząd terytorialny, 12, s. 7-19. ; Naveh Z., 2000, What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction, Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, s. 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00077-3 ; Naveh Z., Lieberman A.S., 1994, Landscape Ecology, Theory and Application, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2331-1 ; Nilsson K., Pauleit S., Bell S., Aalbers C., Nielsen T.S. (red.), 2013, Peri-Urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land Use Change in Europe, Springer, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30529-0 ; Okely J., 2005, Wizualizm i krajobraz: patrzeć i widzieć w Normandii, Polska Sztuka Ludowa - Konteksty, 59, 4, s. 11-22. ; Olwig K.R., 1996, Recovering the substantive nature of landscape, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86, 4, s. 630-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1996.tb01770.x ; Ostaszewska K., 2002, Geografia Krajobrazu, PWN, Warszawa. ; Pietraszko S., 2012, Kultura. Studia teoretyczne i metodologiczne, Prace Kulturoznawcze, 14, s. 135-145. ; Pietrzak M., 1998, Koncepcja hemorobii w badaniach krajobrazowych, Acta Geographica Lodzensis, 74, Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Łódź. ; Pinto-Correia T., Gustavsson R., Pirnat J., 2006, Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions - Towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management, Landscape Ecology, 21, 3, s. 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-4720-7 ; Piorr A., Ravetz J., Tosics I. (red.), 2011, Peri-urbanisation in Europe: Towards a European Policy to Sustain Urban-Rural Futures, University of Copenhagen, Academic Books Life Sciences. ; Plit J., 2016, Krajobrazy kulturowe Polski i ich przemiany, Prace Geograficzne, 253, Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, Warszawa. ; Reimann C., de Caritat P., 2005, Distinguishing between natural and anthropogenic sources for elements in the environment: regional geochemical surveys versus enrichment factors, Science of The Total Environment, 337, 1-3, s. 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.06.011 ; Richling A., Ostaszewska K., (red.), 2005, Geografia fizyczna Polski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa. ; Sahraouiab Y., Clauzelc C., Foltêtea J.-Ch., 2016, Spatial modelling of landscape aesthetic potential in urban-rural fringes, Journal of Environmental Management 181, 1, s. 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.031 ; Sauer C. O., 1925, The morphology of landscape, [w:] J. Leighly (red.), Land and life, University of California Publications in Geography, 2, reprint 1974, Berkely, University of California, s. 315-350. ; Schäfer P., Theissinger R., Brühl K., 2013, An expert-based landscape permeability model for assessing the impact of agricultural management on amphibian migration, Basic and Applied Ecology, 14, 5, s. 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.05.004 ; Simmel G., 2006, Most i drzwi; Wybór esejów, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa. ; Singleton P.H., Gaines W.L., Lehmkuhl J.F., 2002, Landscape permeability for large carnivores in Washington: a geographic information system weighted-distance and least-cost corridor assessment, Res. Pap. PNW-RP-549, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR: U.S. https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-RP-549 ; Słowiński M., Lamentowicz M., Łuców D., Barabach J., Brykała D., Tyszkowski S., Pieńczewska A., Śnieszko Z., Dietze E., Jażdżewski K., Obremska M., Ott F., Brauer A., Marcisz K., 2019, Paleoecological and historical data as an important tool in ecosystem management, Journal of Environmental Management. 236, s. 755-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.002 ; Solon J., 2008, Przegląd wybranych podejść do typologii krajobraz, Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, 20, s. 25-33. ; Solon J., 2015, Krajobraz jako przestrzeń integrująca różne podejścia do ochrony dziedzictwa przyrodniczego i kulturowego oraz kształtowania warunków życia społeczeństwa, [w:] S. Ratajski, M. Ziółkowski (red.), Krajobraz kulturowo-przyrodniczy z perspektywy społecznej, Polski Komitet ds. UNESCO, Narodowe Centrum Kultury, Warszawa, s. 27-47. ; Solon J., Borzyszkowski J., Bidłasik M., Richling A., Badora K., Balon J., Brzezińska-Wójcik T., Chabudziński Ł., Dobrowolski R., Grzegorczyk I., Jodłowski M., Kistowski M., Kot R., Krąż P., Lechnio J., Macias A., Majchrowska A., Malinowska E., Migoń P., Myga-Piątek U., Nita J., Papińska E., Rodzik R., Strzyż M., Terpiłowski S., Ziaja W., 2018, Physico-geographical mesoregions of Poland: verification and adjustment of boundaries on the basis of contemporary spatial data, Geographia Polonica, 91, 2, 143-170. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0115 ; Solon J., Chmielewski T.J., Myga-Piątek U., Kistowski M., 2015, Identyfikacja i ocena krajobrazów Polski - etapy i metody postępowania w toku audytu krajobrazowego w województwach, [w:] T. Chmielewski (red.), Klasyfikacje i oceny krajobrazów Polski drugiej dekady XXI w., Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu 40, s. 55-77. ; Solon J., Roo-Zielińska E., Affek A., Kowalska A., Kruczkowska B., Wolski J., Degórski M., Grabińska B., Kołaczkowska E., Regulska E., Zawiska I., 2017, Świadczenia ekosystemowe w krajobrazie młodoglacjalnym. Ocena potencjału i wykorzystania, Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN, Wydawnictwo Akademickie SEDNO, Warszawa. ; Sozio G., Mortelliti A., Boitani L., 2013, Mice on the move: Wheat rows as a means to increase permeability in agricultural landscapes, Biological Conservation, 165, s.198-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.022 ; Swaffield S., Primdahl J., 2006, Spatial concepts in landscape analysis and policy: Some implications of globalization, Landscape Ecology, 21, 3, s. 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-4414-6 ; Szulczewska B., 2018, Zielona infrastruktura, Studia Komitetu Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju, 189, Warszawa. ; Taylor P.D., Fahrig L., Henein K., Merriam G., 1993, Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure, Oikos, 68, 571-573. https://doi.org/10.2307/3544927 ; The Multifunctionality of Green Infrastructure, 2012, Science for Environment Policy; DG Environment News Alert Service: In-depth Reports, European Environmental Agency, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/docs/Green_Infrastructure.pdf ; Theobald D.M., Reed S.E., Fields K., Soule M., 2012, Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States, Conservation Letters, 5, s. 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00218.x ; Tieskens K., Schulp C., Levers C., Lieskovsk J., Kuemmerle T., Plieninger T., Verburg P., 2017, Characterizing European cultural landscapes: Accounting for structure, management intensity and value of agricultural and forest landscapes, Land Use Policy, 62, s. 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.001 ; Tobler W.R., 1970, A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Economic Geography, 46, s. 234-240. https://doi.org/10.2307/143141 ; Towards a European Green Infrastructure for Europe, Developing new concepts for integration of Natura 2000 network into a broader countryside, 2007, Natura 2000 preparatory actions, Lot 3: EC study ENV.B.2/SER/2007/0076, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/docs/green_infrastructure_integration.pdf ; UNESCO, 1992, Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage, World Heritage Committee, Santa Fe, United States of America. ; Uuemaa E., Antrop M., Roosaare J., Marja R., Mander Ü., 2009, Landscape metrics and indices: An overview of their use in landscape research, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2009-1 ; van der Zanden E.H., Levers Ch., Verburg P.H., Kuemmerle T., 2016, Representing composition, spatial structure and management intensity of European agricultural landscapes: A new typology, Landscape and Urban Planning, 150, s. 36-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.005 ; Van Eetvelde V., Antrop M., 2004, Analyzing structural and functional changes of traditional landscapes - Two examples from southern France, Landscape and Urban Planning, 67, 1, s.79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00030-6 ; Werquin A.C., Duhem B., Lindholm G., Oppermann B., Pauleit S., Tjallingii S., (red.), 2005, Green structure and urban planning, Cost Action II, Final Report, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels. ; Willgoose G., 2018, Principles of Soil scape and landscape evolution, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139029339 ; Wu Ch., Isaksson K., Antonson H., 2017, The struggle to achieve holistic landscape planning: Lessons from planning the E6 road route through Tanum World Heritage Site, Sweden, Land Use Policy, 67, s. 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.036 ; Xua L., Wang J., 2017, Quantifying the potential and flux landscapes of multi-locus evolution, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 422, s. 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.04.013 ; Zalecenie CM/Rec (2008)3, Komitetu Ministrów dla państw członkowskich w sprawie wytycznych dotyczących wdrażania Europejskiej Konwencji Krajobrazowej. https://ochronaprzyrody.gdos.gov.pl/files/artykuly/5460/1_Zalecenia_Ministrow_Wdrazanie_ELC_171120103.pdf ; Zonneveld J.I.S., 1999, Landscape synthesis in monitoring global change, [w:] M.R. Moss, R.J. Milne (red.), Landscape synthesis. Concepts and applications. Landscape system analysis in environment management, Working Group of the International Association for Landscape Ecology, s. 1-10. ; Zonneveld J.I.S., 2005, The land unit as a black box: A Pandora's box?, [w:] J.A. Wiens, M.R. Moss (red.), Issues in landscape ecology, Studies in Landscape Ecology, Cambridge University Press, s. 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614415.033

Relation:

Przegląd Geograficzny

Volume:

91

Issue:

3

Start page:

325

End page:

347

Format:

File size 0,3 MB ; application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:83102 ; 2300-8466 (on-line) ; 10.7163/PrzG.2019.3.2

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

Objects

Similar

This page uses 'cookies'. More information