Metadata language
Toponyms and spatial representations
Creator: Publisher: Place of publishing: Date issued/created: Description: Subject and Keywords:
toponyms ; cognitive map ; linguistic relativity
Abstract:This paper addresses an interesting issue in name theory, specifically the relationship between top-onyms and spatial representations, as well as the cultural differences manifesting themselves in con-nection with these. Studies have shown that the name model (a general knowledge of names) cre-ated based on the mental representation of names is partly language and culture dependent. Thus, the knowledge of the speaker on how reliably the toponyms correlate with the actual features of the landscape or whether they should only be considered as labels identifying an area is culturally determined. This, in turn, influences the extent to which name-users may rely on them in structur-ing space and in creating a cognitive map.
References:
(Eds.), Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Boroditsky, L. (2006). Linguistic relativity. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp.
Boroditsky, L. (2009, June 11). How does our language shape the way we think. Edge. https:// www.edge.org/conversation/lera_boroditsky-how-does-our-language-shape-the-way-we-think
Boroditsky, L. (2011). How language shapes thought. Scientific American, 304(2), 62–65.
Bright, W. (2003). What IS a name? Reflections on Onomastics? Language and Linguistics, 4(4), 669–681.
Burenhult, N., & Levinso n, S.C. (2008). Language and landscape: a cross-linguistic perspective. Language Science, 30, 135–150.
Bybee, J.L., & Slobi n, D.I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of English past tense. Language, 58, 265–289.
Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms
Access: