Object structure
Title:

Anthropological Fieldwork and “Having an Ideology”

Creator:

Humphrey, Caroline

Publisher:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology Polish Academy of Sciences

Place of publishing:

Warsaw

Date issued/created:

2023

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Subject and Keywords:

ideology ; USSR ; Cold War ; Siberia ; Buryatia ; Russia

Abstract:

In European anthropological circles there was a burst of interest in the topic of ideology in the 1970s in the wake of the riots of May 1968 in Paris and consequent intense interpretative conflict about theory among French intellectuals. The ideas then discussed in the wider context of the Cold War still have pertinence to the present day when ideology seems to clothe, if not inspire, armed confrontations and authoritarian forms of government. This article reviews the intellectual formation then current among Western anthropologists, points to its deficiencies, and notes that even though the issues then debated about ideology still have some interest they were proper to their time. Since then, not only has anthropology moved on, but the world and the very purchase of “political ideology” has fundamentally changed. In this light I re-visited my fieldnotes from research in Siberia in the 1990s and 2000s and I attempt with hindsight to reflect on my ethnographic experience and its relevance for today. Finally, I introduce some remarks about the relevance of all this to the contemporary situation in Russia.

References:

Althusser, Louis. 1976. “Idéologie et appareils idéologiques d’état (notes pour une recherche).” In Positions (1965-1975) edited by Louis Althusser, 67-125. Paris: Editions Sociales.
Asad, Talal. 1979. “Anthropology and the analysis of ideology.” Man 14 (4): 607-627.
Bloch, Maurice. 1977. “The past and the present in the present.” Man 12 (1): 55-81.
Bloch, Maurice. 1985. “From cognition to ideology.” In Power and Knowledge: Anthropological and Sociological Approaches, edited by Richard Fardon, 21-48. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
DeWeese, Devin. 2012. “Survival strategies: Reflections on the notion of religious ‘survivals’ in Soviet ethnographic studies of Muslim religious life in Central Asia.” In Exploring the Edge of Empire: Soviet Era Anthropology in the Caucasus and Central Asia, edited by Florian Mühlfried and Sergey Sokolovskiy (eds.), 35-58. Münster: LIT.
Fenghi, Fabrizio. 2020. It Will Be Fun and Terrifying: Nationalism and Protest in Post-Soviet Russia. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. 2013. A Spy in the Archives: A Memoir of Cold War Russia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press
Hellbeck, Jochen. 2001. “Working, struggling, becoming: Stalin-era autobiographical texts.” The Russian Review, 60 (3): 340-359
Humphrey, Caroline. 1983. Karl Marx Collective: Economy, Society and Religion in a Siberian Collective Farm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Humphrey, Caroline. 1998. Marx Went Away, But Karl Stayed Behind. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Humphrey, Caroline. 2001. “Inequality and exclusion: a Russian case-study of emotion in politics.” Anthropological Theory 1 (3): 331-353.
Humphrey, Caroline. 2003. “Stalin and the Blue Elephant: paranoia and complicity in post-Communist metahistories.” In Transparency and Conspiracy: Ethnographies of Suspicion in the New World Order, edited by Harry West and Todd Sanders, 175-203. Durham: Duke University Press.
Humphrey, Caroline. 2008. “The creative bureaucrat: conflicts in the production of Soviet Communist Party discourse.” Inner Asia, 10 (1): 5-36
Kruglova, Anna. 2017. “Social theory and everyday Marxists: Russian perspectives on epistemology and ethics.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 59(4): 759-785.
Luehrmann, Sonja. 2011. “The modernity of manual reproduction: Soviet propaganda and the creative life of ideology.” Cultural Anthropology 26 (3): 363-388
Oustinova-Stjepanovic, Galina. 2020. “One is the biggest number: estrangement, intimacy and totalitarianism in late Soviet Russia.” In The Intimate Life of Dissent: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Harini Amarasuriya, Tobias Kelly, Sidhartan Maunaguru, Galina Oustinova-Stjepanovic and Jonathan Spencer, 22-45. London: UCL Press.
Pelkmans, Mathijs. 2017. Fragile Conviction: Changing Ideological Landscapes in Urban Kyrgyzstan. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Prozorov, Sergei. 2005. “Russian conservatism in the Putin presidency: the dispersion of a hegemonic discourse.” Journal of Political Ideologies 10 (2): 121-143
Robbins, Joel. 2020. Theology and the Anthropology of Christian Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roseberry, William. 1997. “Marx and anthropology.” Annual Reviews of Anthropology 26 (1): 25-46
Samorukov, Maksim. 2023. “Ugroza mirom. Pochemu Putin nikogda ne zakonchit voinu.” https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/89993. Consulted July 2023.
Sántha, István and Safonova, Tatiana. 2011. “Pokazukha in the House of Culture: The pattern of behavior in Kurumkan, Eastern Buriatiia.” In Reconstructing the House of Culture: Community, self, and the makings of culture in Russia and beyond, edited by Brian Donohue and Joachim Otto Habeck, 75-96. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.
Sem’ya Vankeevykh [The Vankeev Family]. 2014. Khozyain Zemli. Irkutsk: Ottisk.
Verdery, Katherine. 2018. My Life as a Spy: Investigations in a Secret Police File. Durham: Duke University Press.
Yurchak, Alexei 2006 Everything Was Forever Until It Was No More. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Relation:

Ethnologia Polona

Volume:

44

Start page:

19

End page:

39

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

0137-4079 ; eISSN 2719-6976 ; doi:10.23858/ethp.2023.44.3419

Source:

IAiE PAN, call no. P 366 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 367 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 368 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-ND 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: