Object

Title: The EU cohesion Policy in Central and Eastern Europe, a Tool for Innovation?

Creator:

Lepesant, Gilles

Date issued/created:

2012

Resource Type:

Article

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 22 (2012)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

s. 11-64

References:

1. Asheim B., 1995, Industrial Disctricts as “Learning Regions”. A Condition for Prosperity?, Studiesin Technology, Innovation and Economic Policy, Oslo, Université d’Oslo. ; 2. Aydalot P., 1987, Les technologies nouvelles et les formes actuelles de la division du travail, dans leDossier du Centre Économie Espace Environnement, 47. ; 3. Bafoil F., Beichelt T., 2008, L’Européanisation d’Ouest en Est, Paris, L’Harmattan, coll. Logiquespolitiques. ; 4. Bailly A., 2009, La science régionale en perspective, Géographie, économie, société, 11. ; 5. Barca F., 2009, Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-Based Approach to MeetingEuropean Union Challenges and Expectations, rapport indépendant préparé pour le compte deDanuta Hübner, commissaire européen en charge de la politique régionale, Bruxelles. ; 6. Barry F., 1999, Understanding Ireland’s Economic Growth, Basingstoke, Palgrave-Macmillan. ; 7. Blažek J., Uhlir D., 2007, Regional Innovation Policies in the Czech Republic and the Case of Prague:An Emerging Role of a Regional Level?, European Planning Studies, 15 (7). ; - ; 8. Breathnach M., Kelly D., 1999, Multinationals, Subcontracting Linkages and the Innovative Performanceof Indigeneous Firms: Some Irish Evidence, document présenté lors de l’European Networkon Industrial Policy International Conference, Dublin, 9-10 décembre 1999. ; 9. Chandler A., 1990, Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge (Mass.),Harvard University Press. ; 10. Clarysse B., Muldur U., 2001, Regional Cohesion in Europe? An Analysis of How Public RTD SupportInfluences the Techno-Economic Regional Landscape, Research Policy, 30 (2). ; 11. Collins P., Pontikakis D., 2006, Innovation Systems in the European Periphery: The Policy Approachesof Ireland and Greece, Science and Public Policy, 33 (10). ; - ; 12. Commission europeenne, 2009, European Commission Economic Forecast, Bruxelles, Commissioneuropéenne. ; 13. Crozet M., Lafourcade M., 2009, La Nouvelle Économie géographique, Paris, La Découverte, coll.Repères. ; 14. Crozier M., 1986, État modeste, État moderne. Stratégies pour un autre changement, Paris, Fayard. ; 15. Eurostat, 2007, Statistiques communautaires de l’innovation, Bruxelles, Eurostat, coll. Statistiquesen bref. ; 16. Eurostat, 2008a, Les Entreprises sous contrôle étranger dans l’UE, Bruxelles, Eurostat, coll. Statistiquesen bref. ; 17. Eurostat, 2008b, The Main Features of the EU Manufacturing Industry, Bruxelles, Eurostat, coll. Statisticsin focus. ; 18. Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Jacobson D., Robertson P.L., 2006, Low-tech Industries: Innovativeness andDevelopment Perspectives. A Summary of a European Research Project, Prometheus. CriticalStudies in Innovation, 24 (1). ; 19. Johnson B., Lundvall B., 1994, The Learning Economy, Journal of Industry Studies, 1 (2). ; 20. Ketels C., Sölvell Ö., 2006, Clusters in the EU-10 New Member Countries, Bruxelles, Commissioneuropéenne. ; 21. Lazonick W., 1991, Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy, Cambridge, CambridgeUniversity Press. ; 22. Lazonick W., 1992, Industry Clusters versus Global Webs, New York (NY), Columbia University,Department of Economics. ; 23. Lepesant G., 2009, Géographie de la crise en Europe centrale, Les Études du CERI, 159. ; 24. Lepesant G., 2001, Géographie économique de l’Europe centrale, Collection Références, Pressesde Sc-Po. ; 25. Liagouras G., 2010, What can we learn from the failures of technology and innovation policies in theEuropean periphery?, European Urban and Regional Studies. ; - ; 26. Linden G., 1998, Building Production Networks in Central Europe: The Case of Electronics Industry,Working Paper, 126, Berkeley (Calif.), University of California, Berkeley Roundtable on theInternational Economy (BRIE). ; 27. Musyck B., Reid A., 2007, Innovation and Regional Development: Do European Structural Fundsmake a Difference?, European Planning Studies, 15 (7). ; - ; 28. Raiser M., Haerfer C., Nowotny T., Wallace C., 2001, Social Capital in Transition: A First Look atEvidence, EBRD Working Paper, 61. ; 29. Rugraff É., 2010, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Supplier-Oriented Upgrading in the CzechMotor Vehicle Industry, Regional Studies, 44 (5). ; - ; 30. Saint-Etienne C., 2009, Mobilisation des territoires pour contribuer à la croissance, Rapport àMonsieur le Président de la République, 29 juin 2009, Paris. ; 31. Siouti V., 2004, Lack of Money, Research Stops, Kyriakatiki Eleftherotypia, 4 April 2004. ; 32. Tödtling F., Trippl M., 2005, One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation PolicyApproach, Research Policy, 34 (8). ; 33. Veltz P., 2008, La Grande Transition. La France dans le monde qui vient, Paris, Seuil. ; 34. Veltz P., 1999, Territoires innovateurs: de quelle innovation parle t-on?, Revue d’économie régionaleet urbaine, 3.

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

22

Start page:

37

End page:

49

Format:

File size 0,6 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:31083 ; 1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2012.22.3

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

This page uses 'cookies'. More information