Object

Title: Minimum levels of Services of General Interest – What fundamental rights do individuals and enterprises have?

Creator:

Littke, Helene ; Rauhut, Daniel

Date issued/created:

2013

Resource type:

Text

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 23 (2013)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

References:

1. Buchanan J.M., 1988. Maktens gränser. Stockholm: Timbro.
2. Böhme K., Doucet P., Komornicki, T., Zaucha J., Swiatek D., 2011. How to Strengthen the Territorial Dimension of 'EUROPE 2020' and EU Cohesion Policy. Warsaw.
3. Ceep 2011. Note for the Macroeconomic Dialogue Meeting on September 20th, 2011. www.ceep.eu [1 April 2013].
4. Christaller W., 1933. Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Jena. Gustav Fischer.
5. European Commission, 2003. Green paper on services of general interest COM(2003)270.
6. European Commission, 2004. White paper on Services of general interest. COM(2004)374 .
7. European Commission, 2006. Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: Social services of general interest in the European Union. COM(2006)177 Final.
8. European Commission, 2007. Services of general interest, including social services of general interest: a new European commitment. COM(2007)725 Final.
9. European Commission, 2008. Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength. COM(2008)616 Final.
10. European Commission, 2010a. Investing in Europe's Future. The Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
11. European Commission, 2010b. Europe 2020. COM(2010)2020 Final.
12. European Union, 2011. The Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011 Gödöllő, Hungary.
13. European Union, 2012. Waste Management. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/environment/waste_management/index_en.htm [1 April 2013].
14. European Parliament, 2000. Charter of Fundamental Rights in the European Union. 2000/C 364/01 [1 April 2013].
15. European Parliament, 2005. Services Directive: directions for use, European Parliament News.
16. Foss O., 2011. Appendix 1 Concepts and definitions of Services of General Interest, [in:] D. RAUHUT, L. BORGES (eds.) Indicators and Perspectives for Services of General Interest in Territorial Cohesion and Development. Luxembourg: ESPON.
17. Gray J., 1986. Liberalism. University of Minnesota Press.
18. Hazlett T.W., 1992. The Road from Serfdom: Foreseeing the Fall. Retrieved from http://www.reason.com/news/show/33304.html [1 April 2013].
19. Hayek F.A., 1959. The Constitution of Liberty. University of Chicago Press.
20. Hayek F.A., 1993 [1944]. The Road to Serfdom. Routledge.
21. Humer A., Palma P., 2013. The Provision of Services of General Interest in Europe: Regional Indices and Types Explained by Socio-economic and Territorial Conditions. EUROPE XXI, vol 23, pp. 85-104.
-
22. Johansson B., Qiugley J.M., 2004. Agglomeration and networks in spatial economies. Papers in Regional Science, vol. 83, pp. 165-176.
-
23. Karlsson C., 2008. Handbook of Research on Cluster Theory. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Cheltenham.
-
-
24. Knowles R., Wareing J., 1976. Economic and Social Geography. London: Heinemann.
25. Knox P.L., Marston S.A., 2004. Human Geography. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
26. Pusemor, 2007. Public Services in Sparsely Populated Mountain Areas. Final Report of the Interreg III B project.
27. Malnes R., Midgaard K., 1993. De politiska idéernas historia. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
28. Mill J.S., Bentham J., 1987. Utilitarianism and other essays. Penguin Classics.
29. Nisbet R., 1986. Conservatism. Open University Press.
30. Nozick R., 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Basic Books.
31. Openshaw S., Veneris Y., 2003. Numerical experiments with central place theory and spatial interaction modelling. Environment and Planning A Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 1389–1403.
-
32. Rawls J., 1992. A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press.
33. Rainbolt G.W., 2006. Rights Theory. Philosophy Compass Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 11–21.
-
34. Ringen S., 1987. The Possibility of Politics: A Study in the Political Economy of the Welfare State. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35. Sepúlveda M., Van Banning T., GUDMUNDSDÓTTIR, G., CHAMOUN, C., Van Genugten, W.J.M., 2004. Human rights reference handbook. Ciudad Colon, Costa Rica: University of Peace.
36. Simmonds N.E., 1986. Juridiska principfrågor, rättvisa, gällande rätt och rättigheter. Stockholm: Norstedts.
37. Stanford Encyclopedia Of Philosophy, 2010. Human Rights. Retrieved at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights-human/ [1 April 2013].
38. Tidens Idéserie 1989. Michael Walzer., [in:] Idéer om rättvisa. Tidens idéserie vol. 1. Tidens förlag.
39. Tullock G., 1976. The Vote Motive. The Institute of Economic Affairs.
40. United Nations, 1948. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
41. Van Berkel R., Fujita T., Hashimoto S., Fujii, M., 2008. Quantitative Assessment of Urban and Industrial Symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. Environmental Science Technology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1271–1281.
-
42. Van De Walle S., 2008. What services are public? What aspects of performance are to be ranked? The case of "services of general interest". International Public Management Journal Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 256-274.
-
43. Walzer M., 1983. Spheres of Justice. Basic Books.
44. Zaucha J., Komornicki T., Böhme K., Światek D., Żuber, P., 2012. Territorial Keys for Bringing Closer the Territorial Agenda of the EU and the Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies, DOI:10.1080/09654313.2012.722976., pp. 1-22.
-

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

23

Start page:

47

End page:

68

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

File size 0,7 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:42019 ; 1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.3

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

Objects

Similar
×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information