Object

Title: Assessing the water footprint of national consumption for Poland

Creator:

Stępniewska, Małgorzata

Date issued/created:

2015

Resource type:

Text

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 88 No. 3 (2015)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Abstract:

The water footprint (WF) of national consumption is an indicator that takes into account both the direct (domestic water use) and indirect (water required to produce the products consumed) water use of consumers within a country. This study quantifies the water footprint of national consumption in Poland on national and regional levels. It tracks the consumptive use of rainwater (green WF) and ground and surface water (blue WF), and water pollution (gray WF). The total WF of national consumption in Poland in the 2006-2011 period was 53.6 Gm3/yr (72% green, 10% blue, 18% gray). The average consumer in Poland had a WF of 1,400.5 m3/yr. Agricultural goods provided the largest contribution to the WF of the average consumer (1,241.4 m3/cap/yr), followed by industrial goods (145.6 m3/cap/yr), and finally domestic water use (13.5 m3/cap/yr). The assessment of the WF has formed a new interesting field for integrated geographical studies. It provides useful data for informing consumers about the environmental impacts of their lifestyle and consumption choices. In water policy, it can also create a basis for discussing water allocation and issues related to sustainable, equitable, and efficient water use.

References:

1. Aldaya M.M., Garrido A., Llamas M.R., Varela C., Novo P., Rodriguez R., 2008. The water footprint of Spain. Sustainable Water Management, vol. 3, pp. 15-20.
2. Aldaya M.M., Martínez-Santos P., Llamas M.R., 2010. Incorporating the water footprint and virtual water into policy: Reflections from the Mancha Occidental Region, Spain. Water Resources Management, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 941-958.
-
3. Allan J.A., 1993. Fortunately, there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible. Proceedings of the conference on Priorities for Water Resources Allocation and Management, Southampton, July 1992, London: Overseas Development Administration, pp. 13-26, http://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/210-93PR-11967.pdf [25 August 2015].
4. Allan J.A., 1994. Overall perspectives on countries and regions [in:] P. Rogers, P. Lydon (eds.), Water in the Arab world: Perspectives and prognoses, Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press, pp. 65-100.
5. Bulsink F., Hoekstra A.Y., Booij M.J., 2010. The water footprint of Indonesian provinces related to the consumption of crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119-128.
-
6. Chapagain A.K., Hoekstra A.Y., 2004. Water footprints of nations. Value of Water Research Report Series, vol. 16, Delft: UNESCO-IHE.
7. CSO, 2006-2011. Local Data Bank. Central Statistical Office of Poland, http://www.stat.gov.pl [8 September 2014].
8. Davis S.J., Caldeira K., 2010. Consumptionbased accounting of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 5687-5692.
-
9. DESTATIS, 2012. Water footprint of food products in Germany 2000-2010. Wiesbaden: Federal Statistical Office of Germany.
10. EC, 2011. Analysis Associated with the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe – Part II. Brussels: European Commission, SEC(2011) 1067 final, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/pdf/working_paper_par t2.pdf [18 October 2014].
11. EP, 2012. Resolution of 24 May 2012 on a resourceefficient Europe. Brussels: European Parliament, P7_TA(2012)0223.
12. Ewing B., Moore D., Goldfinger S., Oursler A., Reed A., Wackernagel M., 2010. The ecological footprint atlas 2010. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.
13. Feng K., Hubacek K., Minx J., Siu Y.L., Chapagain A.K., Yu Y., Guan D., Barrett J., 2011. Spatially explicit analysis of water footprints in the UK. Water, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47-63.
-
14. FAOSTAT, 2006-2011. Food Balance Sheets. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://faostat.fao.org [8 September 2014].
15. Galli A., Wiedmann T., Ercin E., Knoblauch D., Ewing B., Giljum S., 2012. Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a "footprint family" of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecological Indicators, vol. 16, pp. 100-112.
-
16. Guan D., Hubacek K., 2007. Assessment of regional trade and virtual water flows in China. Ecological Economics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 159-170.
-
17. Gupta K.B., 2008. Water footprint of India and its implications for international trade in food products. South Asia Economic Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 419-433.
-
18. Hastings E., Pegram G., 2012. Literature review for the applicability of water footprints in South Africa. WRC Report, no. 2099/P/11, Gezina: Water Research Commission.
19. Hoekstra A.Y. (ed.), 2003. Virtual water trade: Proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade. Value of Water Research Report Series, vol. 12, Delft: UNESCO-IHE.
20. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K., 2007. Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resources Management, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 35-48.
-
21. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K., Aldaya M.M., Mekonnen M.M., 2009. Water footprint manual state of the art. Enschede: Water Footprint Network.
22. Hoekstra A.Y., Chapagain A.K., Aldaya M.M., Mekonnen M.M., 2011. The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. London: Earthscan.
23. Hoekstra A.Y., Hung P.Q., 2002. Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of Water Research Report Series, vol. 11, Delft: UNESCO-IHE.
24. Hoekstra A.Y., Mekonnen M.M., 2012. Reply to Ridoutt and Huang: From water footprint assessment to policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 22, p. E1425.
-
25. Hoekstra A.Y., Mekonnen M.M., 2012. The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 3232-3237.
-
26. Hoff H., Fader M., Gerten D., Döll P., Hauser S., 2013. Water footprints of cities – indicators for sustainable consumption and production. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 10, pp. 2601-2639.
-
27. Liu C., Kroeze C., Hoekstra A.Y., Gerbens-Leenes W., 2012. Past and future trends in grey water footprints of anthropogenic nitrogen and phosphorus inputs to major world rivers. Ecological Indicators, vol. 18, pp. 42-49.
-
28. Liu J., Savenije H.H.G., 2008. Food consumption patterns and their effect on water requirement in China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 887-898.
-
29. Mekonnen M.M., Hoekstra A.Y., 2010. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Value of Water Research Report Series, vol. 47, Delft: UNESCO-IHE.
30. Mekonnen M.M., Hoekstra A.Y., 2010. The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products. Value of Water Research Report Series, vol. 48, Delft: UNESCO-IHE.
31. Mekonnen M.M., Hoekstra A.Y., 2011. National water footprint accounts: The green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption. Value of Water Research Report Series, vol. 50, Delft: UNESCO-IHE.
32. Nijdam D.S., Wilting H.C., Goedkoop M.J., Madsen J., 2005. Environmental load from Dutch private consumption: How much damage takes place abroad? Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 9, no. 1-2, pp. 147-168.
-
33. Rees W.E., 1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 121-130.
-
34. SEPA, 2013. Consumption-based indicators in Swedish environmental policy. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
35. Sonnenberg A., Chapagain A., Geiger M., August D., 2009. Der Wasser-Fußabdruck Deutschlands: Woher stammt das Wasser, das in unseren Lebensmitteln steckt? Frankfurt am Main: WWF Germany.
36. Steen-Olsen K., Weinzettel J., Cranston G., Ercin A.E., Hertwich E.G., 2012. Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: Consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 20, pp. 10883-10891.
-
37. Stępniewska M., 2012. Water footprint as an indicator of water supply – ecosystem services. A case study for urban municipalities of Wielkopolska region. Ekonomia i Środowisko, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 153-166.
38. Thaler S., Zessner M., De Lis F.B., Kreuzinger N., Fehringer R., 2012. Considerations on methodological challenges for water footprint calculations. Water Science & Technology, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1258-1264.
39. Vanham D., 2013. The water footprint of Austria for different diets. Water Science & Technology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 824-830.
-
40. Vanham D., 2013. An assessment of the virtual water balance for agricultural products in EU river basins. Water Resources and Industry, vol. 1-2, pp. 49-59.
-
41. Vanham D., Bidoglio G., 2013. A review on the indicator water footprint for the EU28. Ecological Indicators, vol. 26, pp. 61-75.
-
42. Vanham D., Mekonnen M.M., Hoekstra A.Y., 2013. The water footprint of the EU for different diets. Ecological Indicators, vol. 32, pp. 1-8.
-
43. Van Oel P., Mekonnen M.M., Hoekstra A.Y., 2009. The external water footprint of the Netherlands: geographically-explicit quantification and impact assessment. Ecological Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 82-92.
-
44. Verma S., Kampman D.A., Van Der Zaag P., Hoekstra A.Y., 2009. Going against the flow: A critical analysis of inter-state virtual water trade in the context of India's National River Linking Program. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, vol. 34, no. 4-5, pp. 261-269.
-
45. Wackernagel M., Onisto L., Linares A.C., López Falfán I.S., Méndez García J., Suárez Guerrero A.I., Suárez Guerrero G., 1997. Ecological footprints of nations: How much nature do they use? How much nature do they have? Mexico: Centre for Sustainability Studies, Universidad Anahuac de Xalapa.
46. Wackernagel M., Rees W., 1996. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
47. Weber C.L., Matthews H.S., 2008. Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecological Economics, vol. 66, no. 2-3, pp. 379-391.
-
48. Wiedmann T., 2009. A review of recent multiregion input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 211-222.
-
49. Yu Y., Hubacek K., Feng K., Guan D., 2010. Assessing regional and global water footprints for the UK. Ecological Economics, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 1140-1147.
-
50. Zeng Z., Liu J., Koeneman P.H., Zarate E., Hoekstra A.Y., 2012. Assessing water footprint at river basin level: A case study for the Heihe River Basin in northwest China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2771–2781.
-

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

88

Issue:

3

Start page:

503

End page:

514

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

File size 0,7 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:56794 ; 0016-7282 ; 10.7163/GPol.0012

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY-ND 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-ND 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-ND 3.0 PL license, full text available at:

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information