RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: Geografia domen internetowych – wybrane aspekty = Internet domain name geography – selected aspects

Creator:

Janc, Krzysztof

Date issued/created:

2015

Resource type:

Text

Subtitle:

Przegląd Geograficzny T. 87 z. 4 (2015)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Abstract:

W artykule przedstawiono miejsce poszczególnych państw w cyberprzestrzeni przez pryzmat domen internetowych. Podstawowym źródłem danych był portal Alexa, prezentujący dane dotyczące najpopularniejszych serwisów internetowych na świecie. Okres analizy obejmuje 5 lat. Na tej podstawie dokonano charakterystyki zróżnicowań domen internetowych funkcjonalnych i krajowych. Przedstawione wyniki wskazują na zauważalną, choć słabnącą, przewagę najbardziej rozwiniętych państw świata oraz tendencję do „bałkanizacji” Internetu.

References:

1. Alves S. Jr., 2014, The Internet Balkanization Discourse Backfires, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2498753 (28.08.2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2498753 -
2. Barnett G.A., Park H.W., 2014, Examining the international internet using multiple measures: New methods for measuring the communication base of globalized cyberspace, Quality & Quantity, 48, 1, s. 563-575.
3. Billon M., Marco R., Lera-Lopez F., 2009, Disparities in ICT adoption: A multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide, Telecommunications Policy, 33, 10, s. 596-610.
4. Brunn S.D., Dodge M., 2001, Mapping the "Worlds" of the World Wide Web (re)structuring global commerce through hyperlinks, American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 10, s. 1717-1739.
5. Choi S., Park H.W., 2014, Flow of online content from production to consumption in the context of globalization theory, Globalizations, 11, 2, s. 171-187.
6. Chung C.J., Barnett G.A., Park H.W., 2014, Inferring international dotcom Web communities by link and content analysis, Quality & Quantity, 48, 2, s. 1117-1133.
7. Dodge M., Zook M., 2009, Internet-based measurement, [w:] R. Kitchin, N. Thrift (red.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Elsevier, Oxford, s. 569-579.
8. Doong S.H., Ho S.C., 2012, The impact of ICT development on the global digital divide, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 5, s. 518-533.
9. Goldsmith J.L., Wu T., 2006, Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a Borderless World, Oxford University Press, New York.
10. Graham M., 2014, Inequitable distributions in Internet geographies: The global south is gaining access, but lags in local content, Innovations, 9, 3-4, s. 3-19.
11. Graham M., 2015, Contradictory connectivity: Spatial imaginaries and techno-mediated positionalities in Kenya's outsourcing sector, Environment and Planning A (w druku).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a140275p -
12. Graham M., De Sabbata S., Zook M. A., 2015, Towards a study of information geographies: (im)mutable augmentations and a mapping of the geographies of information, Geo: Geography and Environment, 2, 1, s. 88-105.
13. Graham M., Zook M., 2011, Visualizing global cyberscapes: Mapping user-generated placemarks, Journal of Urban Technology, 18, 1, s. 115-132.
14. Graham M., Zook M., 2013, Augmented realities and uneven geographies: Exploring the geolinguistic contours of the web, Environment and Planning A, 45, 1, s. 77-99.
15. Grubesic T.H., 2002, Spatial dimensions of Internet activity, Telecommunications Policy, 26, 7, s. 363-387.
16. Ilnicki D., Janc K., 2009, Topology, nodality and space of internet flows, Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis-Geographica, 40, 2, s. 15-26.
17. Kende M., 2011, Overview of recent changes in the IP interconnection ecosystem, Analysys Mason, Washington D.C.
18. Kiiski S., Pohjola M., 2002, Cross-country diffusion of the Internet, Information Economics and Policy, 14, 2, s. 297-310.
19. Lee H.Y., Lee Y.G., 2004, Analysis on the spatial dimension of the commercial domains: The Case of Seoul, Korea, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 39, 2, s. 195-211.
20. Lo B.W., Sedhain R.S., 2006 How reliable are Website rankings? Implications for e-business advertising and Internet search, Issues in Information Systems, 7, 2, s. 233-238.
21. Nwagwu W., Ibitola T., 2010, Aspects of size and geography of an African cyberspace, South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 76, 2, s. 168-180.
22. Nunes F., 2006, The Portuguese urban system: An opposition between its hierarchical organization in cyberspace vs. physical space, Telematics and Informatics, 23, 2, s. 74-94.
23. Pelyasov A.N., Kuritsyna-Korsovskaya E.N., 2011, Regional distribution of Russian internet domains, Regional Research of Russia, 1, 3, s. 210-216.
24. Polatin-Reuben D., Wright J., 2014, An Internet with BRICS Characteristics: Data Sovereignty and the Balkanisation of the Internet, 4th USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (FOCI 14), USENIX Association.
25. Shiode N., Batty M., 2000, Power law distributions in real and virtual worlds, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis Working Paper, 19, CASA, London.
26. Siłka P., 2014, Przestrzenne aspekty rozwoju społeczeństwa informacyjnego w Polsce, [w:] S. Ciok, K. Janc (red.), Współczesne wyzwania polityki regionalnej i gospodarki przestrzennej. T. 2. Rozprawy Naukowe Instytutu Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego, 33/2, Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław, s. 39-49.
27. Sternberg R., Krymalowski M., 2002, Internet domains and the innovativeness of cities/ regions-evidence from Germany and Munich, European Planning Studies, 10, 2, s. 251-273.
28. Townsend A.M., 2001, The Internet and the rise of the new network cities, 1969-1999, Environment and Planning B, 28, 1, s. 39-58.
29. Warf B., 2011, Geographies of global Internet censorship, GeoJournal, 76, 1, s. 1-23.
30. Warf B., Vincent P, 2007, Multiple geographies of the Arab Internet, Area, 39, 1, s. 83-96.
31. Weltevreden J.W., Atzema O.A., Frenken K., Kruif K.D., van Oort F.G., 2005, The geography of Internet adoption by retailers, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 5, s. 1-42.
32. Vaughan L., 2008, A new frontier of informetric and webometric research: mining Web usage data, Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2, 2, s. 29-35.
33. Vaughan L., Yang R., 2012, Web data as academic and business quality estimates: A comparison of three data sources, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 10, s. 960–197.
34. Vaughan L., Yang R., 2013, Web traffic and organization performance measures: Relationships and data sources examined, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 3, s. 699– 711.
35. Xu X., 2012, Internet of things in service innovation, The Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 14, 6, s. 698-719.
36. Zhen F., Wang B., Wei Z., 2014, The rise of the internet city in China: Production and consumption of internet information, Urban Studies (w druku).
37. Zook M.A., 2000, Internet metrics: using host and domain counts to map the Internet, Telecommunications Policy, 24, 6, s. 613-620.
38. Zook M.A., 2003, Underground globalization: mapping the space of flows of the Internet adult industry, Environment and Planning A, 35, 7, s. 1261-1286.
39. Zook M.A., 2005, The Geography of Internet Industry. Venture Capital, Dot-coms, and Local Knowledge, Blackwell, London.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470774250 -

Relation:

Przegląd Geograficzny

Volume:

87

Issue:

4

Start page:

643

End page:

658

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

File size 0,8 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:57350 ; 0033-2143 ; 10.7163/PrzG.2015.4.4

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY-ND 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-ND 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-ND 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

Access:

Open

Objects Similar

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information