Mongolia is often regarded as a young democratic state that has successfully undergone the process of transformation from communism to democracy. However, a cultural anthropological analysis of Mongolian political life shows the potential differences between the ideas organizing social life in Mongolia and those known in advanced democratic societies. This article1 traces some cultural peculiarities that have impacted on the political situation of contemporary Mongolia. Special attention has been devoted to the concept of yos, which is regarded as a relevant aspect of morality in Mongolian traditional culture and is still important in understanding behavioral motives of contemporary Mongols. The rules of yos contain a set of proper and improper behavioral criteria towards family members and friendship networks as well as providing a model for proper relations to the state. The concept of collective personhood in the Mongolian cultural way of thinking means a range of social consequences incapable of being observed through analyzes involving individualistic personhood-based methodology
Byambajav D. 2012. Formal and informal networks in post-socialist Mongolia: Access, uses, and inequalities. In J. Dierkes (ed.), Change in Democratic Mongolia, Social Relations, Health, Mobile Pastoralism, and Mining, Leiden, Boston, 31–54 ; Dierkes J. (ed.) 2012. Change in Democratic Mongolia. Social Relations, Health, Mobile Pastoralism, and Mining, Leiden, Boston ; Empson R. 2011. Harnessing fortune. Personhood, Memory and Place in Mongolia, Oxford ; Empson R. 2012. The Dangers of Excess. Accumulating and Dispersing Fortune in Mongolia, Social Analysis 56 (Issue 1), 1–16, doi: 10.3167/sa.2012.560108 ; Humphrey C. 1997. Exemplars and rules. Aspects of the discourse of moralities in Mongolia. In S. Howell (ed.), The ethnography of moralities, 25–47 ; Humphrey C. 2012a. Favors and “normal heroes”. The case of socialist higher education, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2, 22–24 ; Humphrey C. and Hürelbaatar U. 2012b. Fortune in the Wind: An Impersonal Subjectivity, Social Analysis 56 (2), 152–167 ; Kaplonski C. 2006. Exemplars and heroes: the individual and the moral in the Mongolian political imagination. In D. Sneath (ed.), States of mind: Power, place and subject in Inner Asia, Western Washington University ; Nagaanbuu B. H. 2011. Mongolchuudyn yazguur gün u khan, Ulaanbaatar ; Potter S. H. and Potter J. M. 1990. China’s Peasants: The Anthropology of a Revolution, Cambridge ; Sabloff P. 2013. Does Everyone Want Democracy? Insights from Mongolia, California ; Sneath D. 2006. Transacting and enacting: Corruption, obligation and the use of monies in Mongolia, Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 71 (1), 89–112 ; Skrynnikova T. D. 2013. Charizma i vlast’ w epohu Cingis-hana, Sanktpetersburg ; Zapaśnik S. 2010. Tolerancja a odmienni kulturowo. In I. Jakubowska-Branicka (ed.), O tolerancji we współczesnej demokracji liberalnej, Warszawa
Nov 24, 2018
Sep 26, 2018
|Tangad, Oyungerel, 2017, Cultural Aspects of Democratization in Mongolia - the Ethical Perspective||Nov 24, 2018|
Czeczott, Witold (1846-1929)
Wasilewski, Jerzy S.
Kozłowski, Janusz Krzysztof (1936- ). Reviewer
Haslund-Christensen, Henning (1896-1948). Autor Hedin, Sven Anders (1865-1952). Przedm. Boor, Helmut Anton Wilhelm de (1891-1976). Tł. Insel-Verlag.
Nowicka, Ewa Zhanaev, Ayur