Object structure
Title:

Floristic richness, diversity, dominance and species evenness in old-field successional ecosystems

Subtitle:

Characteristics of old-field successional ecosystems

Creator:

Symonides, Ewa

Contributor:

Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Ekologii

Publisher:

Polish Scientific Publishers

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Date issued/created:

1986

Description:

Pages 61-79 : illustrations ; 24 cm ; Bibliographical references (pages 78-79) ; Abstract in Polish

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Subject and Keywords:

old-field succession ; total diversity ; evenness ; dominance ; species richness ; similarity ; above-ground biomass ; importance values of species

Abstract:

The floristic composition of plant communities, their species richness, total diversity, evenness and dominance were studied in four uneven-aged old-fields (a Peucedano-Pinetum forest habitat) for three successive years. In the course of succession of the phytocoenoses the following were observed: (1) continuous directional changes in specific composition, (2) fluctuations of the values of the quantitative indices of structure, with a tendency towards lower levels of the indices of species richness, total diversity and evenness, a growth of the dominance index, (3) a fall of the rate of changes in the qualitative and quantitative structure characteristics, (4) a growing resistance of the communities to variable weather conditions.

References:

1. Bazzaz F. A. 1975 – Plant species diversity in old-field successional ecosystems in southern Illinois – Ecology, 56: 485-488.
2. Connell J. H., Orias E. 1964 – The ecological regulation of species diversity – Am. Nat. 98: 399-414.
3. Dickman M. 1968 – Some indices of diversity – Ecology, 49: 1191-1193.
4. Ellenberg E. 1956 – Aufgaben und Methoden der Vegetationskunde. Einführung in die Phytologie von Heinrich Walter. IV. Grundlagen der Vegetationsgliederung, I. Teil – Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 136 pp.
5. Faliński J. B. 1980a – Changes in the sex- and age-ratio in populations of pioneer dioecious woody species (Juniperus, Populus, Salix) in connection with the course of vegetation succession in abandoned farmlands – Ekol. pol. 28: 237-365.
6. Faliński J. B. 1980b – Vegetation dynamics and sex structure of the populations of pioneer dioecious woody plants – Vegetatio, 43: 23-38.
7. Frydman I., Whittaker R. H. 1968 – Forest associations of southeast Lublin Province, Poland – Ecology, 49: 896-908.
8. Gross K. L. 1980 – Colonization by Verbascum thapsus (Mullein) of an old-field in Michigan: experiments on the effects of vegetation – J. Ecol. 68: 919-927.
9. Houssard C., Escarre J., Romane F. 1980 – Development of species diversity in some Mediterranean plant communities (In: Succession, Ed. E. van der Maarel) – Dr. W. Junk by Publishers, The Hague-Boston-London, 59-72.
10. Hulbert S. H. 1971 - The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters - Ecology, 52: 577-586.
11. Jacobs J. 1975 - Diversity, stability and maturity in ecosystems influenced by human activities (In: Unifying concept in ecology, Eds. W. H. van Dobben, R. H. Lowe-McConnell) – Dr. W. Junk B. V. Publishers, The Hague, 187-207.
12. Kwiatkowska A. J. 1978 - Analiza statystyczna problemu homogeniczności fitocenozy na przykładzie zbiorowiska boru świeżego [A statistical analysis of the homogeneity of a phytocoenosis asexemplified by a medium-moist pine forest community] – Ph.D. Thesis, Warsaw University, 133 pp.
13. Maarel E. van der 1970 – Vegetationsstruktur und Minimum-areal in einem Dünen-Trockenrasen (In: Gesellschaftsmorphologie (Strukturforschung), Ed. R. Tüxen) – Dr. W. Junk N. V., Den Haag, 218-239.
14. May R. M. 1975 – Patterns of species abundance and diversity (In: Ecology and evolution of communities, Eds. M. L. Cody, J. M. Diamond) – Harvard Univ., Cambridge, 81-120.
15. May R. M. 1976 - Patterns in multi-species communities (In: Theoretical ecology, principles and applications, Ed. R. M. May) – Saunders, Philadelphia, 142-162.
16. Menhinick E. F. 1964 – A comparison of some species diversity indices applied to samples of field insects – Ecology, 45: 859-861.
17. Müller T. 1970 – Mosaikkomplexe und Fragmentkomplexe (In: Gesellschaftsmorphologie (Strukturforschung), Ed. R. Tüxen) – Dr. W. Junk N. V., Den Haag, 69-107.
18. Nicholson S. A., Monk C. D. 1974 – Plant species diversity in old-field succession on the Georgia Piedmont – Ecology, 55: 1075-1085.
19. Odum E. P. 1969 - The strategy of ecosystem development – Science, N. Y. 164: 262-270.
20. Peet R. K. 1974 - The measurement of species diversity - Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5: 285-307.
21. Peet R. K. 1975 - Relative diversity indices - Ecology, 56: 496-498.
22. Pianka E. R. 1966 - Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts - Am. Nat. 100: 33-46.
23. Pianka E. R. 1967 – On lizard species diversity: North American flatland deserts – Ecology, 48: 333-351.
24. Pianka E. R. 1969 – Habitat specificity, speciation, and species density in Australian desert lizard - Ecology, 50: 498-502.
25. Pielou E. C. 1966a - The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections - J. theor. Biol. 13: 131-144.
26. Pielou E. C. 1966b - Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession – J. theor. Biol. 10: 370-383.
27. Shafi M. J., Yarranton G. A. 1973 – Diversity, floristic richness and species evenness during a secondary (post-fire) succession – Ecology, 54: 897-902.
28. Simpson E. H. 1949 – Measurement of diversity - Nature, Lond. 163: 688.
29. Tepedino V. J., Stanton N. L. 1981 – Diversity and competition in bee-plant communities on short-grass prairie - Oikos, 36: 35-44.
30. Tramer E. J. 1975 - The regulation of plant species diversity on an early successional old-field - Ecology, 56: 905-914.
31. Tüxen R. 1970 – Einige Bestandes- und Typenmerkmale in der Struktur der Pflanzengesellschaften (In: Gesellschaftsmorphologie (Strukturforschung), Ed. R. Tüxen) – Dr. W. Junk N. V., Den Haag, 76-107.
32. Werner P. A. 1976 – Ecology of plant populations in successional environment – Syst. Bot. 1: 246-268.
33. Whittaker R. H. 1965 - Dominance and diversity in land plant communities - Science, N. Y. 147: 250-260.
34. Whittaker R. H. 1970 - The population structure of vegetation (In: Gesellschaftsmorphologie (Strukturforschung), Ed. R. Tüxen) – Dr. W. Junk N. V., Den Haag, 39-62.
35. Whittaker R. H. 1972 – Evolution and measurement of species diversity - Taxon, 21: 213-251.
36. Whittaker R. H. 1977 – Evolution of species diversity in land communities (In: Evolutionary biology, vol. 10, Eds. M. K. Hecht, W. C. Steere, B. Wallace) - Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1-67.
37. Whittaker R. H., Niering W. A. 1965 - Vegetation of the Santa Catalonia Mountains, Arizona: a gradient analysis of the south slope -Ecology, 46: 429-452.
38. Wihlm J. L. 1968 – Use of biomass units in Shannon's formula - Ecology, 49: 153-156.
39. Wiśniewski J. B. 1964 – Rozwój osadnictwa na pograniczu polsko-rusko-litewskim od końca XIV w. do połowy XVII w. [Colonization development of the Polish-Ruthenian-Lithunian borderland from end of XIV to the early part of XVII century] – Balto-Slavica, 1: 115-135.

Relation:

Ekologia Polska

Volume:

33

Issue:

1

Start page:

61

End page:

79

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

ISSN 0420-9036

Source:

MiIZ PAN, call no. P.2840 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

pol

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: