Object structure

Title:

Convergence and cohesion: the contribution made by Poland to the debate about regional policies of the European Union

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 26 (2014)

Creator:

Epasto, Simona

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Date issued/created:

2014

Subject and Keywords:

cohesion policy ; Europe 2020 Strategy ; Poland ; European Union ; regional policies ; convergence ; regional growth and development ; multilevel governance

Abstract:

The importance of Poland to the European Union is first and foremost an excellent example of the success of the EU enlargement: a Country in which the benefits of the membership had the effect of dampeningthe euroscepticism and brought stability both on an economic and a political level. At the same time the significant contribution that Poland has brought to the management of difficulties due to the economic crisis is undeniable,not only because its economic structures are facing the global economic downturn in an excellent manner, but mainly because, even in this context, it supports the need for greater cohesion between the various partners.Poland seems to demonstrate a strong European feeling as well as the fact that it defends the way of a combined support to Member States at risk of bankruptcy and it’s making out of itself a promoter of an approach basedon solidarity. The aim of this paper is to explore the Poland’s case on many levels, from the debate concerning the potential of cohesion policy to the need of finding the necessity of reinforcing the economic governance ofthe EU as a whole, new solutions for helping the economies of the European periphery, from the question about a real politic multilevel union to the actual geoeconomics and geopolitical dynamics between the EU and itseastern countries politics. It could be used as an example to the virtuous use of structural funds of the EU and to consider a new approach to reduce regional disparities that takes into consideration local peculiarities. It alsocould represent an important starting point in order to pave the way to new policies and outlining strategies in the search for real convergence.

References:

1. Adams N., Cotella G., Nunes R., 2011, Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning, Knowledge and Policy Development in AN Enlarged EU, Routledge, London. ; 2. Bache I., 2008, Europeanization and Multilevel Governance, Cohesion Policy in the European Union and Britain, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Maryland, USA. ; 3. Bachtler J., Mendez C., 2007, Who Governs EU Cohesion Policy? Deconstructing the Reforms of the Structural Funds, in "Journal of Common Market Studies", 45(3), pp. 535-564. ; - ; 4. Bekemans L., 2012, Intercultural Dialogue and Multi-level Governance in Europe. A Human Rights Based Approach, International Academic Publishers Peter Lang, Brussels ; 5. Bialasiewicz L., O'Loughlin J., 2002, Re-ordering Europe's Eastern frontier: Galicjan Identities and Political Cartographies on the Polish-Ukrainian Border, in Kaplan D., Hakli J., (eds) Boundaries and Place: European Borderlands in Geographical Context, London: Rowman & Littlefield. ; 6. Bialasiewicz L., 2002, The rebirth of Upper Silesia, in "Regional and Federal Studies" 12(2): 111-132 ; - ; 7. Boehme K., Doucet P., Komornicki T., Zaucha J., Świątek D., 2011, How to strengthen the territorial dimension of 'Europe 2020' and the EU Cohesion Policy. Background Report based on the Territorial Agenda 2020. Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development, 2011 - 82 pp. ; 8. Bova V., 2005, Solidarnosc. Origini, sviluppo ed istituzionalizzazione di un movimento sociale, Rubettino, Catanzaro. ; 9. Brzezinski M., 2000, The Struggle for Constitutionalism in Poland (St Antony's Series), Palgrave Macmillan, London. ; 10. Camagni R., 2009, Per un concetto di capitale territoriale, in Borri D., Ferlaino F., (eds), Crescita e sviluppo regionale: strumenti, sistemi, azioni, Franco Angeli, Milano. ; 11. Commission of the European Communities, 2008, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee, Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion.Turning territorial diversity into strength, Brussels, 6.10.2008, COM (2008) 616 final. ; 12. Cotella G., 2012, Cohesion and Development in the EU: A Multi-level Issue (Editorial), in "Europa XXI", 22, 2012, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Warsaw, 5 pp. ; 13. Council of the European Union, 2009, Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit Prague 7 May 2009, Brussels, 7 May 2009 8435/09 (Press 78), in "www.consilium.europa.eu". ; 14. Council of the European Union, 2012, PRESS RELEASE 3152nd Council meeting Environment, Provisional version, Brussels, 9 March 2012. ; 15. Czech M., Kursk J., 2013,Komorowski: Jeszcze Ukraina nie zginęła. Nie ma zgody na politykę szantażu, in "Gazeta Wyborcza", 26.11.2013. ; 16. Czeck M., 2013, Kres zbliżenia Ukrainy z Europą: Janukowycz wywrócił stolik, in "Gazeta Wyborcza", 1. 11.2013. ; 17. Da Rold V., 2013, Raggiunto accordo su bilancio settennale Ue, il primo al ribasso. Erasmus salvo, in "il Sole24 ore", 8 Febbraio 2013. ; 18. Dotti F.N., 2010, Being poor is not enough: the 'non-written' factors affecting of the EU structural funds, XXXI Conferenza Italiana di Scienze Regionali, Associazione Italiana di Scienze Regionali (AISRe), in www.grupposervizioambiente.it. ; 19. Duhr S., Colomb C., Nadine V., 2010, European spatial planning and territorial cooperation, Routledge, New York. ; 20. European Commission, 2010a, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Regional Policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020, Brussels, 6.10.2010, COM(2010) 553 final. ; 21. European Commission, 2010b, Communication from the Commission, EUROPE 2020, A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Brussels, 3.3.2010, COM(2010) 2020 final. ; 22. European Commission, 2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe, Brussels, 20.9.2011, COM(2011) 571 final. ; 23. European Commission, 2012a, Commission Staff Working Document, Elements for a Common Strategic Framework 2014 to 2020, the European Regional Development Fund the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, Brussels, 14.3.2012, SWD(2012) 61 final, Part I. ; 24. European Commission, 2012b, Commission Staff Working Document, Elements for a Common Strategic Framework 2014 to 2020, the European Regional Development Fund the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, ANNEXES, Brussels, 14.3.2012, SWD(2012) 61 final, Part II. ; 25. European Commission, 2013a, Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on Italy 2013 national reform programme and delivering a Council opinion on Italy's stability programme for 2012-2017, Brussels, 29.5.2013, COM(2013) 362 final. ; 26. European Commission, 2013b, The Compact for Growth and Jobs: one year on, Report to the European Council, 27-28 June 2013, in http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020. ; 27. European Court of Auditors, 2013, Special report No 5 2013, Are EU Cohesion Policy Funds well spent on roads?, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ; 28. European Parliament, 2013, Resolution of 14 March 2013 on the Energy roadmap 2050, a future with energy, 2012/2103(INI), inwww.europarl.europa.eu ; 29. Ezcurra R., Pascual P., 2008, Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: evidence from several European Union countries, in "Environment and Planning A", 40(5), pp. 1185-1201. ; - ; 30. Franco M., 2011, UE: sfide e opportunità della presidenza polacca, "EURASIA", Rivista di Studi Geopolitici, in "www.eurasia-rivista.org", 24 Luglio 2011. ; 31. Hanzelewicz A., 2013, Polonia celebra 9 anni in UE, balzo del Pil del 46,3%. Rapporto del Ministero degli esteri, la crisi aiuta a colmare il gap, in www.ansa.it, June 5, 2013, 4.47 p.m. ; 32. HU Presidency, 2011, Territorial Agenda 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions, in "http://www.eu2011.hu". ; 33. Italian Trade Agency, 2012, POLONIA – Newsletter FONDI UE, n.21, ottobre – novembre 2012, in "http://www.ice.gov.it". ; 34. Jarczeswski W., 2010, Regional Observatories of Development Policy as a tool for monitoring the efficiency of the cohesion policy, in "Europa XXI", 2010, 21: 155-172. ; 35. Komornicki T. et al., 2011, The territorial state and perspectives of the European Union. 2011 update. Background document for the Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Budapest: Vati, 2011 – 90 pp. ; 36. Lukowski J., Zawadzki H., 2001, A concise history of Poland, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ; 37. Lukowski J., Zawadzki H., 2009, Polonia. Il paese che rinasce, Beit, Trieste. ; 38. Mendez C., Wishlade F., Yuill D., 2006, Conditioning and Fine-Tuning Europeanization: Negotiating Regional policy Maps under the EU's Competition and Cohesion Policies, in "Journal of Common Market Studies", 44(3), pp. 581-605. ; 39. Ministero degli Affari Esteri, 2014, POLONIA, Rapporto Congiunto Ambasciate/ Consolati/ ENIT 2014, in "www.esteri.it/MAE/pdf_paesi/EUROPA/Polonia.pdf" ; 40. Ministero degli Affari Esteri, Ambasciata d'Italia, 2013, Polonia, in www.infomercatiesteri.it ; 41. Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, 2013, Documento di economia e finanza 2013, Sezione III Programma Nazionale di Riforme, deliberato dal Consiglio dei Ministri il 10 Aprile 2013. ; 42. Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, 2013, Fundusze Europejskie 2014-2020, Założenia Umowy Partnerstwa przyjęte, Informacja prasowa, 15 stycznia 2013 r., in www.mrr.gov.pl. ; 43. Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego, 2013, Programowanie perspektywy finansowej 2014-2020, Założenia Umowy Partnerstwa, Przyjęte przez Radę Ministrów w dniu 15 stycznia 2013 roku, in www.mrr.gov.pl. ; 44. Ministerstwo Środowiska, 2013, Spotkanie Wysokiego Szczebla na rzecz klimatu i czystego powietrza w trakcie COP19/CMP9, in "www.mos.gov.pl", 2013-11-22. ; 45. Ministry of Regional Development, 2011, How to strengthen the territorial dimension of "Europe 2020" and EU Cohesion Policy, Background Report based on the Territorial Agenda 2020, Warsaw. ; 46. Ministry of Regional Development, 2012, National spatial development concept 2030, Summary of the Government Document approved by the Council of Ministers on 13 December 2011,Warsaw. ; 47. Ministry of Regional Development, 2013a, Place-based. Territorially sensitive and integrated approach, Warsaw. ; 48. Ministry of Regional Development, 2013b, Poland and its Funds, in www.funduszeeuropejskie.gov.pl. ; 49. Ministry of the Environment, 2013, Green Investment Scheme in Poland. GIS, by Ministry of the Environment in cooperation with National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management, Printed on paper with the PEFC certificate, in www.nfosigw.gov.pl. ; 50. Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Środowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, 2013, System zielonych inwestycji (GIS – Green Investment Scheme) Czesc 7) GAZELA, in www.nfosigw.gov. pl/en/priority-programmes. ; 51. PAIIZ, 2012, Klimat Inwestycyjny w Polsce, Wyniki badania, Warszawa, październik 2012, in www.paiz.gov.pl. ; 52. Republic of Poland, 2012, National Development Strategy 2020, Active society, competitive economy, efficient State, Attachment to Resolution No 157 of the Council of Ministers of 25 September 2012, Warsaw ; 53. Republic of Poland, 2013a, Convergence Program, 2013 UPDATE, Warsaw, April 2013. ; 54. Republic of Poland, 2013b, National Reform Programme, Europe 2020, 2013/2014 UPDATE, adopted by the Council of Ministers on 30 April 2013. ; 55. Rzeczpospolita Polska, Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych, 2012, Przewodnictwo Polski w Radzie Unii Europejskiej. Raport końcowy z przygotowania i sprawowania prezydencji złożony przez Pełnomocnika Rządu ds. Przygotowania Organów Administracji Rządowej i Sprawowania przez Rzeczpospolita Polska Przewodnictwa w Radzie Unii Europejskiej, na podstawie § 1. pkt 2. Rozporządzenia Rady Ministrów z dnia 15 lipca 2008 r. (Dz. U. nr 133, poz. 843 z późn. zm.), Raport przyjęty przez Radę Ministrów w dniu 17 kwietnia 2012 r. ; 56. Szul R., 2102, Cohesion in the European Union: Economic, Political, Cultural Challenges,in "Europa XXI", 22, 2012, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Warsaw, pag. 13. ; 57. Tacconi M., 2013, L'Europa scopre lo shale gas, gli ambientalisti si mobilitano, in www.europaquotidiano.it/2013/10/27/leuropa-scopre-lo-shale-gas-gli-ambientalisti-si-mobilitano/#, 27/10/2013. ; 58. Tusk D., 2011, Polacy wierzą w projekt europejski, in www.consilium.europa.eu, 01/07/2011. ; 59. Wonka A., 2008, Decision-making dynamics in the European Commission: partisan, national or Sectoral, in "Journal of European Public Policy", 15(8), pp. 1145-1163. ; - ; 60. Zamoyski A., 1994, The Polish Way: A Thousand-Year History of the Poles and Their Culture, Hippocrene Books, New York.

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

26

Start page:

55

End page:

84

Resource Type:

Article

Format:

File size 3,5 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2014.26.4

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure