@misc{Truściński_Łukasz_„Ty_2026,
 author={Truściński, Łukasz},
 volume={74},
 number={1},
 copyright={Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license},
 journal={Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej},
 address={Warszawa},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2026},
 publisher={Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The article examines perceptions associated with the taboo surrounding the killing of dogs within the community of Drohobych during the first half of the eighteenth century. It also seeks to determine how this prohibition functioned in social practice. To this aim, I employed a microhistorical approach, analysing two court cases from the 1730s. In the first, a member of the butchers’ guild was suspected of having killed a dog; in the second, another butcher was accused of contact with a knacker’s tools. In both instances, the accused faced the loss of honour and, consequently, exclusion from the guild community. As the cases demonstrate, however, the mere transgression of the taboo was not in itself sufficient to bring an individual into disrepute. It was also necessary for a public accusation to emerge under circumstances that the community could not ignore.},
 title={„Ty niegodzien być między nami w cechu, boś ty zabił sukę”. Osiemnastowieczni drohobyccy rzeźnicy wobec tabu zabijania psów},
 type={Text},
 URL={http://rcin.org.pl/iae/Content/263072/300231.pdf},
 keywords={artisans, taboo, dogs, Drohobycz, 18th c.},
}