<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://rcin.org.pl/igipz/style/common/xsl/oai-style.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" 
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/
         http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
	<responseDate>2026-04-29T05:09:34Z</responseDate>
	<request identifier="oai:rcin.org.pl:243336" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" verb="GetRecord">
	https://rcin.org.pl/igipz/oai-pmh-repository.xml</request>
	<GetRecord>
	
  <record>
	<header>
		<identifier>oai:rcin.org.pl:243336</identifier>
	    <datestamp>2025-06-18T15:36:06Z</datestamp>
		  <setSpec>rcin.org.pl:partnerCollections:igipz:libr</setSpec> 	      <setSpec>rcin.org.pl</setSpec> 	      <setSpec>rcin.org.pl:partnerCollections:igipz:igpaspubl</setSpec> 	      <setSpec>rcin.org.pl:literature:journalArticles</setSpec> 	      <setSpec>rcin.org.pl:partnerCollections:igipz</setSpec> 	      <setSpec>rcin.org.pl:literature</setSpec> 	      <setSpec>rcin.org.pl:partnerCollections:igipz:libr:serial</setSpec> 	      <setSpec>rcin.org.pl:partnerCollections</setSpec> 	    </header>
		<metadata>
	<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Geographia Polonica Vol. 97 No. 4 (2024)]]></dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The prospects for the implementation of Planning Support Systems (PSS) in participatory decision-making in local governments in Poland]]></dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[Geographia Polonica Vol. 97 No. 4 (2024)]]></dc:title>
<dc:title xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[The prospects for the implementation of Planning Support Systems (PSS) in participatory decision-making in local governments in Poland]]></dc:title>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bąkowska-Waldmann, Edyta. Autor]]></dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[local government]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[spatial planning]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[decision-making]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[planning support systems]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[public participation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[władze lokalne]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[planowanie przestrzenne]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[podejmowanie decyzji]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[systemy wsparcia planowania]]></dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[partycypacja publiczna]]></dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[24 cm]]></dc:description>
<dc:description xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The aim of the research was to investigate the use and potential of Planning Support Systems (PSS) in public participation within spatial planning in Polish local governments. Data from 718 local spatial planning departments, collected using CATI method, reveals limited current use of PSS tools in public participation, primarily passive online document viewing. Despite this, there is a growing potential for online methods, such as interactive meetings, necessitating PSS tools for real-time interaction. The study highlights a strong adherence to statutory consultation forms, suggesting a need for PSS development focused on legal requirements in public participation.]]></dc:description>
<dc:description xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[24 cm]]></dc:description>
<dc:description xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[The aim of the research was to investigate the use and potential of Planning Support Systems (PSS) in public participation within spatial planning in Polish local governments. Data from 718 local spatial planning departments, collected using CATI method, reveals limited current use of PSS tools in public participation, primarily passive online document viewing. Despite this, there is a growing potential for online methods, such as interactive meetings, necessitating PSS tools for real-time interaction. The study highlights a strong adherence to statutory consultation forms, suggesting a need for PSS development focused on legal requirements in public participation.]]></dc:description>
<dc:publisher><![CDATA[IGiPZ PAN]]></dc:publisher>
<dc:date><![CDATA[2024]]></dc:date>
<dc:type xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Text]]></dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[Tekst]]></dc:type>
<dc:identifier><![CDATA[0016-7282 (print)]]></dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier><![CDATA[2300-7362 (online)]]></dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier><![CDATA[10.7163/GPol.0285]]></dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier><![CDATA[https://rcin.org.pl/igipz/dlibra/publication/279965/edition/243336/content]]></dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier><![CDATA[oai:rcin.org.pl:243336]]></dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406]]></dc:source>
<dc:source xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[https://catalog.cbgios.pan.pl/search?idx=control-number&q=ee95400564]]></dc:source>
<dc:source xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406]]></dc:source>
<dc:source xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[https://catalog.cbgios.pan.pl/search?idx=control-number&q=ee95400564]]></dc:source>
<dc:language><![CDATA[eng]]></dc:language>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Geographia Polonica]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Act of 7 July 2023 amending the Act on Spatial Planning and Development and certain other acts, Journal of Laws 2023, item 1688.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Alfrink, K., Keller, I., Doorn, N., & Kortuem, G. (2022). Tensions in transparent urban AI: Designing a smart electric vehicle charge point. AI & Society, 38(3), 1049-1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01436-9]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Aspen, D. M., & Amundsen, A. (2021). Developing a participatory planning support system for sustainable regional planning - A problem structuring case study. Sustainability, 13, 5723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105723]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Bąkowska-Waldmann, E. (2023). Residents' experiential knowledge and its importance for decision-making processes in spatial planning: A PPGIS based study. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12, 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12030102]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., & Kaczmarek, T. (2021). The use of PPGIS: Towards reaching a meaningful public participation in spatial planning. International Journal of Geo-Information, 10, 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10090581]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., & Kaczmarek, T. (2022). PPGIS potential in local governance and spatial planning: Lessons from Poland. In C. S. Silva (Ed.), Trends and innovations in urban e-planning (pp. 17-41). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9090-4.ch002]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Batty, M. (2007). Planning support systems: Progress, predictions, and speculations on the shape of things to come. UCL Working Paper Series, 122, 1-25.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Blijleven, W. (2022). Expert, bureaucrat, facilitator: The role of expert public servants in interactive governance. Local Government Studies, 49(4), 841-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2047028]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46, 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Campagna, M., Steinitz, C., Di Cesare, E. A., Cocco, Ch., Ballal, H., & Canfield, T. (2016). Collaboration in planning: The Geodesign approach. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 35, 55-72.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Cardullo, P. (2021). Citizens in the 'Smart City': Participation, co-production, governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429438806]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R., & Turton, I. (2001). Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(6), 907-921. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2751t]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Clark, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L., & Bryman, A. (2021). Bryman's social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Craig, W., Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (2002). Community participation and Geographic Information Systems. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and Geographic Information Systems (pp. 3-16). London: Taylor and Francis.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Davoudi, S. (2015). Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14(3), 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215575919]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Denters, B. (2017). Participation and democratic accountability: Making a difference for the citizens. In Ch. Schwab, G. Bouckaert, & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), The future of local government in Europe: Lessons from research and practice in 31 countries (pp. 79-100). Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845280639-79]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Elwood, S. (2006). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of Participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[European Commission. (2022). eGovernment Benchmark 2022. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/egovernment-benchmark-2022]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Falco, E. (2016). Digital community planning. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 5(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2016040101]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Fischer, F. (2012). Participatory governance: From theory to practice. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 457-471). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0032]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Flacke, J., Shrestha, R., & Aguilar, R. (2020). Strengthening participation using interactive planning support systems: A systematic review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9010049]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Friedmann, J. (1993). Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 482-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975902]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Geertman, S. (2002). Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2760]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2009). Planning support systems: Best practice and new methods. Springer]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of planning support science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (2009). Planning support systems: Content, issues, and trends. In S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning support systems: Best practice and new methods (pp. 1-26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_1]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2003). Planning support systems in practice. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24795-1]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Geertman, S., Ferreira, J., Goodspeed, R., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.). (2015). Planning support systems and smart cities. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Gunton, T. (2007). Collaborative planning. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopedia of governance (pp. 106-107). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Hansson, K., Göran, C., Love, E., & Mats, D. (2013). The importance of recognition for equal representation in participatory processes: Lessons from Husby. Footprint, 13, 81-98. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.7.2.771]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Harris, B. (1989). Beyond geographic information systems: Computers and the planning professional. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368908975408]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1068/b230217]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Hampshire and London: McMillan Press Limited.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Herzog, R. H., Gonçalves, J. E., Slingerland, G., Kleinhans, R., Prang, H., Brazier, F., & Verma, T. (2022). Identifying public values and spatial conflicts in urban planning. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04719]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x9501400307]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Młodkowski, M., & Zwoliński, Z. (2016). Geo-questionnaire: A method and tool for public preference elicitation in land use planning. Transactions in GIS, 20(6), 903-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12191]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Młodkowski, M., Zwoliński, Z., & Wójcicki, M. (2017). Evaluating the scalability of public participation in urban land use planning: A comparison of Geoweb methods with face-to-face meetings. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317719709]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Jankowski, P., Czepkiewicz, M., Zwoliński, Z., Kaczmarek, T., Młodkowski, M., Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., Mikuła, Ł., Brudka, C., & Walczak, D. (2019). Geoweb methods for public participation in urban planning: Selected cases from Poland. In K. Koutsopoulos, R. Gonzalez, & K. Donert (Eds.), Geospatial Challenges in 21st Century (pp. 249-269). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04750-4_13]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Jędraszko, A. (2008). Gospodarka przestrzenna w Polsce wobec standardów europejskich, czyli jak ustanowić dobre prawo dla zrównoważonego rozwoju. Biblioteka Urbanisty, 13. Warszawa: Urbanista.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Jeon, C. M., & Lee, H. C. (2016). The trends and characteristics of engaged urban planning in Korea: Focused on 2030 master plans for Cheongju, Suwon, and Seoul. Seoul Studies, 17, 1-16.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Jiang, H., Geertman, S., & Witte, P. (2020). Avoiding the planning support system pitfalls? What smart governance can learn from the planning support system implementation gap. Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(8), 1343-1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320934824]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Johnson, P. A., Corbett, J. M., Gore, C., Robinson, P., Allen, P., & Sieber, R. (2015). A web of expectations: Evolving relationships in community participatory Geoweb projects. ACME: An International Journal of Critical Geography, 14(3), 827-848. https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v14i3.1235]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Jordan, T. (2014). Deliberative methods for complex issues: A typology of functions that may need scaffolding. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 13, 50-71.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Kaczmarek, T., & Mikuła, Ł. (2021). Konsultacje społeczne w planowaniu przestrzennym z użyciem narzędzi PPGIS. In A. Bochentyn, & J. H. Szlachetko (Eds.), Cyfrowa czy analogowa? Funkcjonowanie administracji publicznej w stanie kryzysu (pp. 410-433). Pelplin: Wydawnictwo Bernardinum.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Kahila-Tani, M. (2015). Reshaping the planning process using local experiences: Utilising PPGIS in participatory urban planning (Doctoral dissertation). Aalto University.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., & Tyger, T. (2016). Let the citizens map -Public Participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki master plan process. Planning Practice & Research, 31(2), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Kahila-Tani, M., Kyttä, M., & Geertman, S. (2019). Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 186, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Kahila, M., & Kyttä, M. (2009). SoftGIS as a bridge builder in collaborative urban planning. In S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning Support Systems: Best Practices and New Methods (pp. 389-412). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_19]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Keenan, B. P., & Jankowski, P. (2019). Spatial decision support systems: Three decades on. Decision Support Systems, 116, 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.010]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Kingston, R. (2002). The role of e-government and public participation in the planning process. Paper presented at XVI AESOP Congress, Volos, Greece, July 14-20.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Klosterman, R. E. (1997). Planning support systems: A new perspective on computer-aided planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9701700105]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Klosterman, R. E. (1999). New perspectives on planning support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, 317-320. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260317]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Klosterman, R. E. (2009). Planning support systems: Retrospect and prospect. In S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning Support Systems. Best Practice and New Methods (pp. V-VII). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Koekoek, A., Van Lammeren, R., & Vonk, G. (2009). The potential of integrating e-participation in planning support systems. URISA Journal, 21(2), 39-47.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Lehtiö, A., Hartikainen, M., Ala-Luopa, S., Olsson, T., & Väänänen, K. (2023). Understanding citizen perceptions of AI in the smart city. AI & Society, 38, 1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01589-7]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Lohr, S. (2009). Sampling: Design and Analysis. Cengage Learning.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Luusua, A., Ylipulli, J., Foth, M., & Aurigi, A. (2023). Urban AI: Understanding the emerging role of artificial intelligence in smart cities. AI & Society, 38, 1039-1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01537-5]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Miessen, M. (2010). The Nightmare of Participation: Crossbench Praxis as a Mode of Criticality. New York: Sternberg Press.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Miller, D., Vogt, N., Nijnik, M., Brondizio, E., & Fiorini, S. (2009). Integrating analytical and participatory techniques for planning the sustainable use of land resources and landscapes. In S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning Support Systems. Best Practice and New Methods (pp. 317-345). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_16]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Murray, M., & Greer, J. (2002). Participatory planning as dialogue: The Northern Ireland regional strategic framework and its public examination process. Policy Studies, 23(3), 191-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144287022000045984]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Niewiadomski, Z. (2002). Planowanie Przestrzenne. Zarys Systemu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze LexisNexis.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Obermeyer, N. J. (1998). The evolution of public participation GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(2), 65-66. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304098782594599]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[OECD. (2023). Economic Survey of Poland 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/economy/poland-economic-snapshot/]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Panek, J. (2018). Mapping citizens' emotions: Participatory planning support system in Olomouc, Czech Republic. Journal of Maps, 15(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2018.1546624]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Pantić, M., Cilliers, J., Cimadomo, G., Montaño, F., Olufemi, O., Torres Mallma, S., & van den Berg, J. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for public participation in urban and regional planning during the COVID-19 pandemic -Lessons learned for the future. Land, 10, 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10121379]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Peltonen, L., & Sairinen, R. (2010). Integrating impact assessment and conflict management in urban planning: Experiences from Finland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(5), 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.04.006]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Pfeffer, K., Martinez, J., O'Sullivan, D., Scott, D. (2015). Geo-technologies for spatial knowledge: Challenges for inclusive and sustainable urban development. In J. Gupta, K. Pfeffer, H. Verrest, & M. Ros-Tonen (Eds.), Geographies of Urban Governance: Advanced Theories, Methods and Practices (pp. 147-174). Berlin: Springer.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Quan, S. J., Li, Q., Augenbroe, G., Brown, J., & Yang, P. P. (2015). Urban data and building energy modeling: A GIS-based urban building energy modeling system using the Urban-EPC engine. In S. Geertman, J. Ferreira, R. Goodspeed, & J. Stillwell (Eds.), Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities (pp. 447-470). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_24]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2005). Delineating "Public" and "Participation" in PPGIS. URISA Journal, 16(2), 15-26.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Shiffer, M. J. (1995). Interactive multimedia planning support: Moving from stand-alone systems to the World Wide Web. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, 649-664. https://doi.org/10.1068/b220649]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Silva, C. S. (Ed.). (2022). Trends and Innovations in Urban e-Planning. Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9090-4]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Steinitz, C. (2012). A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. Redlands: Esri Press.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Stepanova, O., Polk, M., & Saldert, H. (2020). Understanding mechanisms of conflict resolution beyond collaboration: An interdisciplinary typology of knowledge types and their integration in practice. Sustainability Science, 15, 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00690-z]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Stevens, D., Dragicevic, S., & Rothley, K. (2007). iCity: A GISeCA modelling tool for urban planning and decision making. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 761-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.02.004]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Sugumaran, R., & DeGroote, J. (2019). Spatial Decision Support Systems: Principles and Practices. Boca Raton: CRC Press.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Talen, E. (1999). Constructing neighborhoods from the bottom up: The case for resident-generated GIS. Environment and Planning B, 26, 533-55. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260533]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Talen, E. (2000). Bottom-Up GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360008976107]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Tulloch, D. L., & Shapiro, T. (2003). The intersection of data access and public participation: Impacting GIS users' success? Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) Journal, 15 APA II, 55-60.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Velibeyoglu, K. (2010). E-Planning applications in Turkish local governments. In S. N. Silva (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 420-434). Hershey: IGI Global.]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2005). Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 909-924. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3712]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Wouters, R., De Fraine, B., & Simons, M. (2019). What is at stake in deliberative inquiry? A review about a deliberative practice. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32, 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9457-8]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Würstle, P., Santhanavanich, T., Padsala, R., & Coors, V. (2021). Development of a digital 3D participation platform - Case study of Weilimdorf (Stuttgart, Germany). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVI-4/W1-2021, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-4-W1-2021-123-2021]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Yigitcanlar, T., Saygin, O., & Han, J. H. (Eds.). (2008). Online Participatory Decision Support Tools for Knowledge-Based Urban Development. Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-838-3.ch011]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[Zhang, L., Geertman, S., Hooimeijer, P., & Lin, Y. (2019). The usefulness of a Web-based Participatory Planning Support System in Wuhan, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 74, 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.006]]></dc:relation>
<dc:relation><![CDATA[oai:rcin.org.pl:publication:279965]]></dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license]]></dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="pl"><![CDATA[Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0]]></dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>

</metadata>
	  </record>	</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
