Will territorial cohesion survive after 2028? Assessing the implications of the reform of Cohesion Policy for future Structural Funds

Żuber, Piotr; Bachtler, John; Churski, Paweł; Komornicki, Tomasz; Matczak, Radomir; Mikołajczyk, Adam; Nowakowska, Aleksandra; Samecki, Paweł; Szlachta, Jacek (1950– ); Zaucha, Jacek

doi:0016-7282 (print)

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Will territorial cohesion survive after 2028? Assessing the implications of the reform of Cohesion Policy for future Structural Funds Żuber, PiotrBachtler, JohnChurski, PawełKomornicki, TomaszMatczak, RadomirMikołajczyk, AdamNowakowska, AleksandraSamecki, PawełSzlachta, Jacek (1950– )Zaucha, Jacek

Object structure

Will territorial cohesion survive after 2028? Assessing the implications of the reform of Cohesion Policy for future Structural Funds

Geographia Polonica Vol. 98 No. 4 (2025)

Żuber, Piotr : Autor ; Bachtler, John : Autor ; Churski, Paweł : Autor ; Komornicki, Tomasz : Autor (geografia) ; Matczak, Radomir : Autor ; Mikołajczyk, Adam : Autor ; Nowakowska, Aleksandra : Autor ; Samecki, Paweł : Autor ; Szlachta, Jacek (1950– ) : Autor ; Zaucha, Jacek : Autor

The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of promoting territorial cohesion as an EU Treaty objective after 2027. It identifies emerging challenges that must be addressed and outlines the fundamental components of a new EU cohesion framework. Furthermore, it examines the process by which these elements should be integrated into the EU Multiannual Financial Framework beyond 2027. The paper presents some new and forward-looking proposals, including the establishment of a new coordination mechanism translating overarching EU goals into local and regional implementation efforts. It provides a snapshot in the EU debate on the future of territorial cohesion initiated and promoted by the Polish Presidency of the EU Council and supported by Polish and foreign scientists in 2023-2024. This article is exploratory and reflective in nature and is intended to serve as inspiration for further discussion. It is based on a review of research on the cohesion policy, as well as on the authors’ expert knowledge.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.
Aksztejn, W. (2020). Local territorial cohesion: Perception of spatial inequalities in access to public services in Polish case-study municipalities. Social Inclusion, 8(4), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i4.3367
Bachtler, J., Mendez, C. & Downes, R. (2024). Charting a new course for Cohesion Policy after 2027. EoRPA Report 24/3. Glasgow: European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde and EPRC Delft.
Bachtler, J. & Mendez, C. (2020).Cohesion Policy: Doing More with Less. In H. Wallace, M. A. Pollack, C. Roederer-Rynning, A. R. Young (Eds.), Policymaking in the European Union. 8th edition (pp. 233-253). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198807605.003.0010
Bachtler, J., & Mendez, C. (2025). Cohesion Policy: the Coming Storm. In H. Wallace, M. Pollack & A. Young (Eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union. 10th Edition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198912408.003.0010
Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Wishlade, F. (2013).EU Cohesion Policy and European Integration: The dynamics of EU budget and regional policy reform. Farnham: Ashgate.
Bachtrögler-Unger, J., Fratesi, U., Perucca, G. (2024). Administrative capacity and the territorial effects of EU support to firms: A two-step analysis. Regional Studies, 58(4), 719-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2109613
Baldwin, R. (2006, accessed 10th February 2025). Globalisation: The great unbundling(s). Helsinki: Economic Council of Finland. https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/295612/files/Baldwin_06-09-20.pdf
Baldwin, R., & Martin, P. (2004). Agglomeration and regional growth. In V. Henderson, J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2671-2711). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0080(04)80017-8
Barca, F. (2009, accessed 9th July 2024). An agenda for a reformed Cohesion Policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. https://migrant-integration.ec.europa.eu/library-document/agenda-reformed-cohesion-policy-placebased-approach-meeting-european-union_en
Barca, F. McCann, F., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Placebased versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science,52(1), 134-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic Growth. (2nd ed.). Cambridge MA, London: MIT Press.
Böhme, K., Doucet, P., Komornicki, T., Zaucha, J., & Świątek, D. (2011). How to strengthen the territorial dimension of "Europe 2020" and EU Cohesion Policy. Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development.
Boyne, G., & Powell, M. ( 1991). Territorial justice A review of theory and evidence. Political Geography Quarterly, 10(3), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-9827(91)90038-V
Bradley, J., & Zaucha, J. (Eds.). (2017). Territorial cohesion: A missing link between economic growth and welfare: Lessons from the Baltic Tiger. Gdańsk: Uniwersytet Gdański.
Bruszt, L. (2008). Multi-level governance − the eastern versions: Emerging patterns of regional developmental governance in the new member states. Regional & Federal Studies, 18(5), 607-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560802351622
Bu, M., Lin, C. T. (2017). Globalisation and climate change: New empirical panel data evidence. In Environmental Economics and Sustainability (pp. 201-220). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119328223.ch9
Camagni, R. (2017). Territorial Impact Assessment (TIA): A Methodological Proposal. In R. Capello (Ed.), Seminal Studies in Regional and Urban Economics (pp. 399-410). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57807-1_20
CEMR. (2022, accessed 19 February, 2025). The use of integrated territorial tools in cohesion policy. Implementation analysis from the perspective of municipalities, regions and their associations. https://ccre-cemr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/230124_EN_analysis_ITI_CLLD_final.pdf
Churski, P., Perdał, R., Konecka-Szydłowska, B., & Herodowicz, T. (2021). European regional development: Contemporary regional and local perspectives of socio-economic and socio-political changes. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84659-6
Churski, P., Komornicki, T., Matczak, R., Mikołajczyk, A., Nowakowska, A., Samecki, P., … & Żuber, P. (2024, accessed 10th February 2025). TESSA MEMORANDUM: Towards Efficient, Simpler, Strategic Assistance under post-2027 Cohesion Policy. https://chur-2.home.amu.edu.pl/admin/uploads/file/bibliografia/TESSA_Memorandum_FINAL_07.11.2024.pdf
Churski, P., Adamiak, C., Dubownik, A., Pietrzykowski, M., & Szyda, B. (2024). What doesn't work in the European cohesion policy? Development challenges of the inner periphery after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Quaestiones Geographicae, 43(4), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0038
Czapiewski, K. (2018). Territorial Inequalities and Local Development - some narrative stories from Poland. In International Geographical Union Regional Conference "Appreciating Difference", August 6-11, 2018, Quebec City (Canada). Quebec: Laval University.
Darvas, Z., & Leandro, Á. (2015). The limitations of policy coordination in the euro area under the European Semester. Bruegel Policy Contribution.
Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: A bridging conceptor a dead end?. Planning Theory and Practice, 13(2), 299-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Dąbrowski, M., Stead, D., & Mashhoodi, B. (2019). EU Cohesion Policy can't buy me love? Exploring the regional determinants of EU image. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11(4), 695-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12237
Department for the Economy. (2025, accessed 20th February 2025). Services of General Economic Interest. https://www.economy-ni.gov.uk/articles/services-general-economic-interest#toc-1
Di Caro, P., Fratesi, U. (2022). One policy, different effects: Estimating the region-specific impacts of EU cohesion policy. Journal of Regional Science, 62(1), 307-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12566
Dijkstra, L. Poelman, H., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies, 54(6), 737-753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603
Diemer, A., Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2022). The regional development trap in Europe. Economic Geography, 98(5), 487-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2022.2080655
Doucet, P. Böhme, K., & Zaucha, J. (2014). EU territory and policy-making: From words to deeds to promote policy integration. European Journal of Spatial Development, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5145266
Draghi, M. (2024, accessed 9th February, 2025). The future of European competitiveness Part A: A competitiveness strategy for Europe. European Commission, Belgium. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/9kbtlhp
Dühr, S. (2011). Territorial cohesion and its impact on sustainable development. Ecoregion Perspectives, 2, 14-15.
EPRC & MDFRP. (2024). Cohesion in a policy-based, simpler and impactful MFF. Reflections Paper presented at the Brussels Workshop on the future of Cohesion Policy, Brussels, European Policies Research Centre (University of Strathclyde & Delft University of Technology and Ministry of Development Funds & Regional Policy, Warsaw).
ESPON. (2012, accessed 20th December 2024). Knowledge, Innovation, Territory. Final Report, KIT Project. Luxembourg, available at https://archive.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/KIT_Final-Report_final.pdf
ESPON. (2020). Policy Brief: Cross-fertilisation of cohesion policy and spatial planning. European Union.
ESPON. (2021). The role and future perspectives of Cohesion Policy in the planning of Metropolitan Areas and Cities Annex VII. Luxembourg: ESPON METRO Project.
ESPON. (2021).The role and future perspectives of Cohesion Policy in the planning of Metropolitan Areas and Cities. Synthesis report. Luxembourg: ESPON METRO Project.
ESPON. (2024). Stocktaking Review of the Territorial Agenda 2030. Final Report. November 2024. ESPON. Luxembourg.
European Commission. (2025, accessed 20th February 2025). The European Green Deal Striving to be the first climate-neutral continent. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
European Commission. (2024, accessed 20th February 2025).Forging a sustainable future together - Cohesion for a competitive and inclusive Europe - Report of the High-Level Group on the Future of Cohesion Policy, February 2024. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2776/974536
European Commission. (2024). Ninth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission. (2022). Eighth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission. (2008). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee. Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Turning territorial diversity into strength. Brussels. 6.10.2008 COM(2008) 616 final.
European Committee of the Regions. (2021). Cohesion as an Overall Value of the European Union. COTER - Commission for Territorial Cohesion Policy and EU Budget. European Union. October 2021. Brussels.
European Network for Rural Development. (2018). EU Rural Review, 25.
EUROSTAT. (2025, accessed 20th February 2025). NUTS - Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts
Faludi, A. (2015). Place is no man's land. Geographia Polonica, 88(1), 5-20. https:// doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2015.1
Faludi, A. (2016). The poverty of territorialism: Revisiting European spatial planning. disP - The Planning Review, 52(3), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2016.1235886
Faludi, A. (2018). The Poverty of Territorialism: A Neo-Medieval View of Europe and European Planning. Cheltenham-Northampton MA: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973618
Faludi, A., & Rocco, R. (2022). Faludi Blogging: Chasing Territorialism. Delft: TU Delft Open Publishing.https://doi.org/10.34641/mg.41
Farole, T., Goga, S., & Ionescu-Heroiu, M. (2018). Rethinking Lagging Regions: Using Cohesion Policy to deliver on the potential of Europe's Regions. Washington: World Bank Report on The European Union. https://doi.org/10.1596/29823
Fidrmuc, J., Hulényi, M., & Tunalı, C. B. (2019). Can money buy EU love?. European Journal of Political Economy, 60, 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.07.002
Fratesi, U. (2025). The four waves of regional policy: Towards an era of trade-offs?. Regional Studies, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2436538
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (2000). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge Massachusetts, London England: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6389.001.0001
Fujta, M., & Thisse, J. F. (2002). Economies of Agglomeration. Cities, Industrial Location and Regional Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805660
Golobič, M., & Marot, N. (2011). Territorial impact assessment: Integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ev
Harvey, D. (2005). Spaces of Neoliberalization: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. Stuttgart: Steiner. https://doi.org/10.25162/9783515115223
Iammarino, S. (2023). Cohesion Policy and its contribution to addressing different development needs of regions. Brussels: European Commission Reflection Group on the future of Cohesion Policy.
Kraay, D., & McKenzie, A. (2014). Do Poverty Traps Exist?. Policy Research Working Paper, 6835. The World Bank.
Leino, P.(2024).Cohesion Policy and the Principle of Subsidiarity - A Legal Analysis. ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 24-042. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4871722
Letta, E. (2024, accessed 29th Decembr 2024). Much more than a Market European Commission. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/ny3j24sm/much-more-than-a-market-report-by-enrico-letta.pdf
López-Bazo, E. (2022). The impact of cohesion policy on regional differences in support for the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(5), 1219-1236. https://doi.org.sire.ub.edu/10.1111/jcms.13153
Ludlow, D., & Rauhut, D. (2013). Services of General Interest: Policy challenges and policy options. Europa XXI, 23, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.7163/eu21.2013.23.4
McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). Redesigning and Reforming European Regional Policy: The Reasons, the Logic, and the Outcomes. International Regional Science Review, 36(3), 424-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017612463234
Medeiros, E. (2020). Territorial Impact Assessment: Cham: Springer.
Medeiros, E., Zaucha, J., & Ciołek, D. (2023). Measuring territorial cohesion trends in Europe: a correlation with EU Cohesion Policy. European Planning Studies, 31, 1868-1884. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2143713
Meinen, P., Serafini, R., & Papagalli, O. (2021). Regional economic impact of COVID-19: The role of sectoral structure and trade linkages. ECB Working Paper Series, No. 2528. https://doi.org/10.2866/648853
Milner, H. V. (2021). Voting for populism in Europe: Globalization, technological change, and the extreme right. Comparative Political Studies, 54(13), 2286-2320. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041402199
MDFRP EPRC (2024). Workshop: Cohesion in a policy-based, simpler and impactful MFF. Reflections Paper. Brussels, 9 December 2024:Ministry of Development Funds and Regional Policy, European Policies Research Centre. https://eprc-strath.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Future_of_-Cohesion_-Reflections_Paper.pdf
Mogiła, Z. (2017). Cohesion as a territorial optimum. In J. Bradley & J. Zaucha (Eds.), Territorial cohesion: A missing link between economic growth and welfare: Lessons from the Baltic Tiger (pp. 73-92). Gdańsk: Uniwersytet Gdański.
New Cohesion Policy. (2021). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/2021-2027_en
OECD. (2020). Delineating Functional Areas in all Territories, OECD Territorial Reviews, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/07970966-en
OECD. (2023). Regional Outlook 2023. The Longstanding Geography of Inequalities. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OIR. (2011, accessed 29th July 2024). Regional Challenges in the Perspective of 2020 - phase 2: Deepening and broadening the analysis. Final report Vienna: Österreichisches Institut für Raumplanung. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/studies/region2020_phase2/challenge2020_report.pdf
Orchowska, J. (2022). W ogóle autobusu nie widać. Życie na obszarach wykluczenia transportowego. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 2(88), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.7366/1509499528807
Peng, C., Yuan, M., Gu, C., Peng, C., & Ming, T. (2017). A review of the theory and practice of regional resilience. Sustainable Cities and Society, 29, 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.12.003
Pike, A., Béal, V., Cauchi-Duval, N., Franklin, R., Kinossian, N., Lang, T., …& Velthuis, S. (2024). 'Left behind' places: a geographical etymology. Regional Studies, 58(6), 1167-1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2167972
Piras, S., Tobiasz-Lis, P., Currie, M., Dmochowska-Dudek, K., Duckett, D., & Copus, A. (2022). Spatial justice on the horizon? A combined theory of change scenario tool to assess place-based interventions. European Planning Studies, 30(5), 952-973. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1928057
Portico (2025, accessed 20th February 2025). Handbook of territorial and local development strategies. https://portico.urban-initiative.eu/joint-research-center-jrc-territorial-development/handbook-territorial-and-local-development-strategies
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. London: Penguin Random House.
Redeker, N., Bischof, D. & Lang, V. (2024). Fixing Cohesion. How to Refocus Regional Policies in the EU. Berlin: Hertie School.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274-1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don't matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
Rodríguez-Pose, A., Bartalucci, F., Lozano-Gracia, N., & Davalos, M. (2024). Overcoming left-behindedness: Moving beyond the efficiency versus equity debate in territorial development. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(12), 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100144
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-165. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), Part 2). https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Shih, W. C. (2020). Supply chain management global supply chains in a post-pandemic world. Harvard Business Review, 98(5), 82-89.
Soja, E. (2009). The city and spatial justice. Spatial Justice, no. 1, September 2009. http://www.jssj.org.
Solly, A. (2020). Territorial inequality and spatial justice. How level is the sustainable development playing field?. Europa XXI, 39, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2020.39.5
Szlachta, J. (2014). Przegląd zasad i kierunków ewolucji polityki regionalnej Polski i Unii Europejskiej do 2013 roku. In K. Gawlikowska-Hueckel, & J. Szlachta (Eds.), Wrażliwość polskich regionów na wyzwania współczesnej gospodarki (pp. 245-270). Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer business.
Szlachta, J., Komornicki, T., & Zaucha, J. (2017). Polish development policy and its territorial dimension. In J. Bradley, & J. Zaucha (Eds.), Territorial cohesion: a missing link between economic growth and welfare: lessons from the Baltic Tiger (pp. 49-71). Gdańsk: Uniwersytet Gdański.
Świątek, D., Komornicki, T., & Siłka, P. (2013). Services of general interest: Empirical evidence from case studies of the SeGI project. Europa XXI, 23, 105-129. https://doi.org/10.7163/Eu21.2013.23.6
Tarshys, D. (2003, accessed 20th February 2025).Reinventing Cohesion: The Future of European Structural Policy. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies. https://www.sieps.se/media/rmuh0fao/reinventing-cohesion_-the-future-of-european-structuralpolicy-2003_17.pdf
TA. (2011, accessed 20th August 2025). Territorial Agenda 2020.Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. https://territorialagenda.eu/wp-content/uploads/territorial_agenda_2020.pdf
TA. (2020, accessed 20th August 2025). Territorial Agenda 2030 - A future for all places. https://territorialagenda.eu/library/
Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839
Toptsidou, M., Böhme, K., Aalbu, S., Schuh, B., Dallhammer, E., Gorny, H., & Gaugitsch, R. (2024). Cohesion Policy and the Single Market: The cost of non-cohesion. Brussels: European Committee of the Regions.
Vedrine, L., & Le Gallo, J. (2021). Does EU Cohesion Policy affect territorial inequalities and regional development?. In D. Rauhut, F. Sielker, & Alois Humer (Eds.), EU Cohesion Policy and Spatial Governance: Territorial, Social and Economic Challenges (pp.156-170). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839103582.00022
Venables, A. (2023). The Case for Place-Based Policy. Brussels: European Commission Reflection Group on the future of Cohesion Policy.
Widuto, A., Evroux, C., & Spinaci, S. (2023). From growth to 'beyond growth: Concepts and challenges. Briefing. European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels, Belgium.
Weitzel, M. (2025). Assessing the distributional consequences of the transition in the EU, Compendium of Practice from a Global Community of Ministries of Finance and Leading Organizations: Economic analysis and modelling tools to assist Ministries of Finance in driving green and resilient transitions, p. 1-3, The Coalition of Finance Ministers for Climate Action, JRC143098.
World Bank. (2009). Reshaping Economic Geography The World Development Report 2009. Washington DC: World Bank.
Zaucha, J. (2017). The territorial keys of policies. In E. Medeiros (Ed.), Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy: Cohesion, Development, Impact Assessment and Cooperation (pp. 23-43). London-New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169743-3
Zaucha, J., Świątek, D., & Stańczuk-Olejnik, K. (2013). Place-based territorially sensitive and integrated approach. Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development.
Zaucha, J., Ciolek, D., Brodzicki, T., & Głazek, E. (2014). Wrażliwość polskich regionów na wyzwania gospodarki globalnej. In K. Gawlikowska-Hueckel, & J. Szlachta (Eds.), Wrażliwość polskich regionów na wyzwania współczesnej gospodarki (pp. 206-244). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.
Zwolinska-Ligaj, M. A., & Guzal-Dec, D. J. (2024).Rural area resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic as exemplified by urban-rural communes in Poland. Sustainability, 16, 5073. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125073