Zalewski, Wojciech

doi:0001-6829

- ris
- BibTeX
- EndNote
- Csv

Double-Track System in Polish Criminal Law : Political and Criminal Assumptions, History, Contemporary References Zalewski, Wojciech

Object structure

Double-Track System in Polish Criminal Law : Political and Criminal Assumptions, History, Contemporary References

The History of Prison Regimes in the Polish Territory in the Nineteeth and Twentieth Centuries ; Acta Poloniae Historica T. 118 (2018)

Zalewski, Wojciech (prawnik)

Instytut Historii Polskiej Akademii Nauk ; Komitet Nauk Historycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk ; Cieszyńska-Klimek, Magda : Tł.

Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk

więzienie ; terapia ; resocjalizacja ; Środki zabezpieczające (prawo karne) -- Polska -- 1900-1945 [KABA] ; Polityka kryminalna -- Europa -- 1900-1945 [KABA] ; Antropologia kryminalna [KABA] ; Areszt prewencyjny [KABA] ; Więźniowie -- resocjalizacja -- historia [KABA]

The authors of the penal code of 1932 modelled their reaction measures on the best contemporary standards. The system of criminal response was based on a double-track model, in German called zwei Spuren, in Italian – doppio binario, in which, along with penalties, there were also preventive measures. This system grew out of certain political and criminal assumptions of the sociological school, expressed most fully in the works of Franz von Liszt. Return in contemporary law, to the wide use of preventive measures, post and pre-penal, forces us to return to the sources and to critically examine the assumptions of the indicated approach, including the idea of an incorrigible criminal who should be isolated, not in relation to what he did, but because of who he is. Tracing the history of regulations, in particular their practical application should be a lesson for modern lawmakers.

Batawia Stanisław, ‘Niepoprawni przestępcy w świetle 150 wyroków z art. 84 k.k.’, Archiwum Kryminologiczne, ii, 3–4 (1937).
Drenkhahn Kirstin, ‘Secure preventive detention in Germany: Incapacitation or treatment intervention’, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, xxxi (2013), 312–27.
Górny Jerzy, Elementy indywidualizacji i humanizacji karania w rozwoju penitencjarystyki (Warszawa, 1996).
Kwieciński Adam, Lecznicze środki zabezpieczające w polskim prawie karnym i praktyka ich wykonywania (Warszawa, 2009).
Pelissero Marco, The doppio binario in Italian criminal law, https://studylib.net/ doc/10742443/the-doppio-binario-in-italian-criminal-law--marco-pelissero [Accessed: 15 Jan. 2019].
Rabinowicz Leon, Podstawy nauki o więziennictwie (Warszawa, 1933).
Simple Janet, Bentham’s Prison: A Study of the Panopticon Penitentiary (Oxford, 1993).
Wąsowicz Marek, Nurt socjologiczny w polskiej myśli prawnokarnej (Warszawa, 1989).
Wetzell Richard F., Inventing the Criminal. A History of German Criminology, 1880–1945 (Chapel Hill and London, 2000).
Zalewski Wojciech, ‘Therapeutic and Legislative Approaches to Sex Offenders in Poland’, Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, xcvii, 1 (2014), Gunda Wößner (ed.), Developing Sexual Offender Laws and Treatment in Europe, 48–56.
Zalewski Wojciech, Przestępca ‘niepoprawny’ – jako problem polityki kryminalnej (Gdańsk, 2010).