RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: Habitat preferences and breeding biology of the clouded apollo Parnassius mnemosyne - and consequences for the species conservation

Creator:

Adamski, Paweł

Date issued/created:

2013

Resource type:

Text

Subtitle:

Studia Naturae 61

Publisher:

Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Place of publishing:

Kraków

Description:

24 cm ; ilustracje ; bibliografia na stronach 57-65 ; ISSN 0081-6760

Type of object:

Journal/Article

References:

Adamski P. 2002. Poszatkowany świat – czyli teoria metapopulacji w ochronie przyrody. W: Grzegorczyk M., Perzanowska J., Kijas Z., Mirek Z. (red.). Mówić o ochronie przyrody. Zintegrowana wizja ochrony przyrody. Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN, Instytut Studiów Franciszkanskich, Instytut Botaniki PAN, Kraków: 167–180.
Adamski P. 2004. Sex ratio of the apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) – facts and artifacts. European Journal of Entomology 101: 341–344.
Adamski P. 2008. Stan populacji niepylaka mnemozyny Parnassius mnemosyne L. (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) na terenie Pienińskiego Parku Narodowego. Pieniny – Przyroda i Człowiek 10: 89–94.
Adamski P. 2012. Niepylak mnemozyna Parnassius mnemosyne (Linnaeus, 1758). W: Makomaska-Juchiewicz M., Baran P. (red.). Monitoring gatunków zwierząt. Przewodnik metodyczny cześć druga. Biblioteka monitoringu środowiska, Warszawa: 219–236.
Adamski P., Bednarek-Ochyra H., Betleja L., Bielański W., Gubała W., Kalemba A., Kaźmierczakowa R., Korzeniak J., Kosior A., Kostrakiewicz L., Kościelniak R., Krobicki M., Kurzyński J., Langer M., Margielewski W., Ochyra R., Pisarczyk R., Pociecha A., Stebel A., Urban J., Witkowski Z., Wojewoda W. 2007. Dostosowanie planu ochrony rezerwatu krajobrazowego „Wąwóz Homole” do obowiązującego prawa ochrony przyrody. Maszynopis.
Adamski P., Witkowski Z. 2006. Male patrolling modes in Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (L.): simulation of optimal choice (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Nature Conservation 62: 27–36.
Adamski P., Witkowski Z.J. 2007. Effectiveness of population recovery projects based on captive breeding. Biological Conservation 140: 1–7.
Agrawal A.A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279 (5354): 1201–1202.
Agrawal A.A., Conner J.K., Johnson M.T.J. , Wallsgrove R. 2007. Ecological genetics of an induced plant defense against herbivores: additive genetic variance and costs of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 56(11): 2206–2213.
Akçakaya H. R., Sjögren-Gulve P. 2000 Population viability analyses in conservation planning: an overview. Ecological Bulletins 48: 9–21.
Analytical Methods Committee. 1989. Robust statistics – how not to reject outliers – Part 2. Interlaboratory trials. Analyst 114: 1699–1705.
Auger P., Poggiale J.C., Sandrine C. 2000. Emergence of individual behaviour at the population level. Effects of density-dependent migration on population dynamics. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Séries III. Sciences de la Vie 323(1): 119–127.
Bergström A. 2005. Oviposition site preferences of the threatened butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne – implication for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 9: 21–27.
Birkehead T.R., Møller A.P. (red.). 1998 Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London.
Bjarnholt N., Nakonieczny M., Kędziorski A., Debinski D.M., Matter S.F., Olsen C.E., Zagrobelny M. 2012. Occurrence of sarmentosin and other hydroxynitrile glucosides in Parnassius (Papilionidae) butterflies and their food plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology 38: 525–537.
Bogucki Z. 1979. Elementy statystyki dla biologów, statystyka opisowa. Wyd. Nauk. UAM, Poznań.
Brunner A.G., Gullison R.E., Rice R.E., de Fonseca G.A.B. 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291 (5501): 125–128.
Bryk F. 1918. Grundzüge der Sphragidologie. Arkiv för Zoologi 11(18): 1–38.
Bryk F. 1932. Parnassiologische Studien aus England. Parnassiana 2: 46–50.
Bryk F. 1935. Lepidoptera. Parnassiidae pars II (Subfam. Parnassiinae). Das Tierreich 65: 1–788.
Burgman M.A., Fox. J.C. 2003. Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Animal Conservation 6: 19–28.
Buszko J. 1997. Atlas rozmieszczenia motyli dziennych w Polsce (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea) 1986–1995. Oficyna Wydawn. Turpress, Toruń.
Buszko J., Masłowski J. 2011. Motyle dzienne Polski. Koliber, Bydgoszcz.
Carey C., Dudley N., Stolton S. 2000. Squandering Paradise. WWF International.
Caughley G., Gunn A. 1996. Conservation biology in theory and practice. Blackwell Science, London.
Chapmann T., Arnquist G., Bangham J., Rowe L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 41–47.
Chown S.L., Nicolson S.W. 2004. Insect Physiological Ecology. Mechanizm and patterns. Oxford Univercity Press, Oxford.
Conway W.G. 1995. Wild and zoo interactive management and habitat conservation. Biodiversity Conservation 4: 573–594.
Crone E.E., Schultz C.B. 2003. Movement behavior and minimum patch size for butterfly population persistence. W: Boggs C., Erlich P., Watt W. (red.). Butterflies as model systems: ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago: 561–576.
Danková K. 1997. Projekt posilnenia populácie jasoňa červenookého na územı´ Pienin. W: Monografie o národných parkoch – Prı´roda Pienin v premenách. Správa národných parkov Slovenskej Republiky: 110–122.
Dempster J.P. 1997. The role of larval food resources and adult movement in the population dynamics of the orange-tip butterfly (Anthocharis cardamines). Oecologia 111: 549–556.
Denis R. L.H., Sparks T.H., Hardy P.B. 1999. Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the effects of sampling effort. Journal of Insect Conservation 3: 33–42.
Di Giulio M., Edwards P.J., Meister E. 2001. Enhancing insect diversity in agricultural grasslands: the roles of management and landscape structure. Journal of Applied Ecology 38 (2): 310–319.
Dolata P.T. 2003. Sokoły wędrowne w miastach. Przegląd Komunalny 7: 18–19.
Dolek M., Geyer A. 2000. Application in conservation biology: capture–recapture – studies in combination with other methods on the apollo butterfly (Parnassius apollo L.). Beiträge zur Ökologie 4 (2): 145–155.
Dolek, M., Geyer, A. 2002. Conserving biodiversity on calcareous grasslands in the Franconian Jura by grazing: a comprehensive approach. Biological Conservation 104 (3): 351–360.
Donald P.F., Collar N., Marsden S.J., Pain D.J. 2010. Facing extinction. The world rarest birds and the race to save them. A&C Black Publishers Ltd., London.
Eberhard W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Elms G.W., Thomas J.A. 1992. Complexity of species conservation in managed habitat: interaction between Maculinea butterflies and their hosts. Biodivercity and Conservation 1: 155–169.
Elzinga R.J. 2004. Fundamentals of entomology. Sixth edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, New York.
Frankham R., Ballou J.D , Briscoe D.A. 2010. Introduction to conservation genetics. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Cape Town, Singapoure, Sao Paulo, Delhi.
Freitas A.V.L., Oliveira P.S. 1996. Ants as selective agents on herbivore biology: effects on the behaviour of a non-myrmecophilous butterfly. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 205–210.
Galván-López E., Mc Dermott J., O’Neil M., Brabazon A. 2011. Defining locality as a problem difficulty measure in genetic programming. Genetic Program Evolvable 12: 365–401.
Geyer A., Dolek M. 1995. Ökologie und Schutz des Apollofalters (Parnassius apollo L.) in der Frankenalb. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie 10 (1–6): 333–336.
Grabińska B. 2007. The distribution of protected and endangered mammals versus land use type of habitat and protected areas of Poland: A geografical approach. Polish Journal of Ecology 55 (3): 605–613.
Gratton P., Konopiński M.K., Sbordoni V. 2008. Pleistocene evolutionary history of the Clouded Apollo (Parnassius mnemosyne): genetic signatures of climate cycles and a ‘time-dependent’ mitochondrial substitution rate. Molecular Ecology 17 (19): 4248–4262.
Grossman M.R. 1994 Agro-environmental measures in the common agricultural policy. University of Memphis Law Review 25: 927–1049.
Halitschke R., Baldwin I.T. 2005. Jasmonates and related compounds in plant–insect interactions. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 23: 238–245.
Hanski I., Moilanen A., Pakkala T., Kuussaari M. 1996. The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation. Conserv. Biol. 10 (2): 578–590.
Hanski I., Ovaskainen O. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404 (6779): 755–758.
Hanski I., Pakkala T., Kuussaari M., Lei G. 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 21–28.
Hanski I., Simberloff D. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain and application to conservation. W: Hanski I., Gilpin M.E. (red.). Metapopulation biology ecology and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, London, Boston, New York, Tokyo, Toronto: 5–26.
Harrison S. 1991. Local extinction in metapopulation context: An empirical evaluation. W: Gilpin M., Hanski I. (red.). Metapopulation dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical Investigations. Academic Press, London: 73–88.
Hawkins B.A, Cornell H.V., Hochberg M.E. 1997. Predators, parasitoids, and pathogens as mortality agents in phytophagous insect populations. Ecology 78: 2145–2152.
Herbich J. (red.). 2004. Wody słodkie i torfowiska. Poradniki ochrony siedlisk i gatunków Natura 2000 – podręcznik metodyczny. Ministerstwo Środowiska, Warszawa.
Hertzberg K., Yoccoz N.G., Ims R.A., Leinaas H.P. 2000. The effects of spatial habitat configuration on recruitment, growth and population structure in arctic Collembola. Oecologia 124 (3): 381–390.
Hockings M., Stolton S., Dudley N. 2000. Assessing effectiveness – a framework for assessing management effectiveness of protected areas. University of Cardiff and IUCN, Switzerland.
Holt R.D., Loreau M. 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: the role of trophic interactions and the importance of system openness. W: Kinzig A., Pacala S. (red.). Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Princeton University Press, Princeton: 246–262.
Hughes D.G., Bennett P.M. 1991. Captive breeding and the conservation of invertebrates. International Zoo Yearbook 30: 45–51.
IUCN 1980. World Conservation Strategy. IUCN, Gland.
Jakubiec Z. 1993. Szanse utrzymania populacji niedźwiedzia brunatnego w polskiej części Karpat. W: Cichocki W. (red.). Ochrona Tatr w obliczu zagrożeń. Wydawnictwo Muzeum Tatrzańskiego, Zakopane: 175–183.
Jakubiec Z. 2001. Niedźwiedź brunatny Ursus arctos L. w polskiej części Karpat. Studia Naturae 47: 1–108.
Jamrozy G. 2008. Ocena występowania i tendencji zmian liczebności dużych i średnich ssaków w polskich parkach narodowych. Sylwan 2: 36–44.
Jokimäki J, Huhta E. 2000. Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along the urban gradient. The Condor 102 (4): 838–847.
Katoh T., Chechvarkin A., Yagi T. Omoto K. 2005. Phylogeny and evolution of butterflies of the genus Parnassius: Inferences from mitochondrial 16S and ND1 sequences. Zoological Science 22: 343–351.
Kleijn D., Rundlof M., Scheper J., Smith H.G., Tscharntke T. 2011. Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26 (9): 474–481.
Kleijn D., Sutherland W.J. 2003. How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology 40 (6): 947–69.
Kluk K. 1779. Zwierząt domowych i dzikich osobliwie kraiowych Historyi Naturalney początki i gospodarstwo. Tom I o zwierzętach ssących. Drukarnia J.K Mości i Rzeczypospolitey u XX. Scholarum Piarum, Warszawa.
Kluk K. 1780. Zwierząt domowych i dzikich osobliwie kraiowych Historyi Naturalney początki i gospodarstwo. Tom IV o owadzie i robaku. Drukarnia J.K Mości i Rzeczypospolitey u XX. Scholarum Piarum, Warszawa.
Kobayashi T., Kitahara M., Tanaka E. 2008. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the three-way interaction among ants, aphids and larvae of the giant purple emperor, Sasakia charonda (Hewitson), a near-threatened butterfly. Ecological Research 23: 409–420.
Koller N., Pearson S., Pozzi S., Godat S., Herzog F., Wermeille E. 2000. Evaluation des mésures de compensation écologique sur la diversité de la flore et des papillons dans la région de Nuvilly-Combremo nt. Revue suisse de l’Agriculture 32 (6): 265–271.
Konvička M. , Kuras T. 1999. Population structure, behaviour and selection of oviposition sites of an endangered butterfly, Parnassius mnemosyne, in Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic. Journal of Instect Conservation 3 (3): 211–223.
Kosior A., Oleś T., Witkowski Z. 1992. O występowaniu niepylaka mnemozyny w Pienińskiem Parku Narodowym. Chrońmy Przyrodę Ojczystą 48 (4): 73–76.
Kossowska-Cezak U. 2007. Podstawy meteorologii i klimatologii. Wyd. Szkoły Przymierza Rodzin, Warszawa.
Levins R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogenity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America. 15: 237–240.
Levy J.M., Connor E.F. 2004. Are garden effective in butterfly conservations? A case study with pipevine swallowtail, Battus philienor. Journal of Instect Conservation 8: 323–330.
Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. str. 465, Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Holmiae (Laurentii Salvii).
Litvak M.E., Monson R.K. 1998. Patterns of induced and constitutive monoterpene production in conifer needles in relation to insect herbivory. Oecologia 114: 531–540.
Lukášek J. 2000. Repatriacje jasne červenookeho (Parnassius apollo L.) ve Štramberku. Ochrana Prirody 55 (3): 68–72.
Luoto M., Kuussaari M., Rita H., Salminen J., von Bonsdorff T. 2001. Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: a landscape ecological approach. Ecography 24 (5): 601–617.
Luoto M., Kuussaari M., Toivonen T. 2002. Modelling butterfly distribution based on remote sensing data. Journal of Biogeography 29 (8): 1027–1037.
Łomnicki A. 2012. Ekologia ewolucyjna. PWN, Warszawa.
Maciejewski S. 1988. Saga o ginących i uratowanych. KAW, Kraków.
Magurran A.E. 2005. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd., Marlden–Oxford–Carlton.
Makomaska-Juchiewicz M., Baran P. (red.). Monitoring gatunków zwierząt. Przewodnik metodyczny cześć druga. Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Warszawa: 95–105.
Malais, M.H., Ravensberg W.J. 2003. Knowing and recognizing: the biology of glasshouse pests and their natural enemies. Reed Business Information, Doetinhem.
Masłowski J. 2006. Uwagi o trzech prawnie chronionych gatunkach motyli dziennych (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) w Sudetach. Przyroda Sudetów 8: 81–88.
Mazerolle M.J., Villard M.A. 1999. Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictors of species presence and abundance: a review. Ecoscience 6: 117–124.
McLean I.F.G., Key R.S. 2012. A History of invertebrates conservation in the Britisch Statuory Conservation Agences W: New T.R. (red.). Insect Conservation: past, perfect and prospect. Springer, Dorhester, NewYork, London: 41–74.
Meier K., Kuusemets V., Luig J., Mander Ü. 2005. Riparian buffer zones as elements of ecological networks: Case study on Parnassius mnemosyne distribution in Estonia. Ecological Engineering 24: 531–537.
Mikula R. 2000. The family butterfly book: projects, activities and field guide to 40 favorite North American species. Storey Books, Pownall, VA.
Moilanen A., Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: Effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79 (7): 2503–2515.
Morris M.G. 2000. The effects of structure and its dynamics on the ecology and conservation of arthropods in British grasslands. Biological Conservation 95 (2): 129–142.
Morris W.F., Bloch P.L., Brian R., Hudgens B.R., Leonie C., Moyle L.C., Stinchcombe J.R. 2001. Population viability analysis in endangered species recovery plans: past use and future improvements. Ecological Applications 12 (3): 708–712.
Muggleton J., Benham B.R. 1975. Isolation and the decline of the Large Blue butterfly (Maculinea arion) in Great Britain. Biological Conservation 7 (2): 119–128.
Mundy P., Butchart D., Ledger J., Piper S. 1992. The vultures of Africa. Academic Press, London.
Murphy D.D., Freas K.E., Weiss S.B. 1990. An environment-metapopulation approach to population viability analysis for a threatened invertebrate. Conservation Biology 4 (1): 41–51.
Nakonieczny M., Michalczyk K., Kędziorski A. 2006. Midgut glycosidases activities in monophagous larvae of Apollo butterfly, Parnassius apollo ssp. frankenbergeri. Comptes Rendus Biologies 329 (10): 765–774.
Nakonieczny M., Michalczyk K., Kędziorski A. 2007 Midgut protease activities in monophagous larvae of Apollo butterfly, Parnassius apollo ssp. frankenbergeri. Comptes Rendus Biologies 330 (2): 126–134.
Nazari V., Zakharov E.V., Sperling F.A.H. 2007. Phylogeny historical biogeography and taxonomic ranking of Parnassiinae (Lepidoptera Papilionidae) based on morphology and seven genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 42: 131–156.
New T.R. 2012. Introduction to insect conservation, an emergig discipline W: New. T.R. (red.). Insect conservation: past, perfect and prospect. Springer, Dorhester, NewYork London.
Nilsen E.B., Pedersen S., Linnel J.D. 2008. Can minimum convex polygon home range be used to draw biological meaningful conclusions? Ecological Research 23: 635–639.
Niven B.S. 1982. Formalization of the basic concepts of animal ecology. Erkenntnis 17: 307–320.
Oesterreicher-Moliwo M. 1992: Leksykon symboli. Wyd. ROK Corporation SA, Warszawa.
Okarma H., Dopchanych Y., Findo S., Ionescu O., Koubek P., Szemethy L. 2002. Large carnivores in the Carpathian Mountains: status and conservation problem. Nature Conservation 59: 33–39.
Olsson U. 2002. Generalized Linear Model. An applied approach. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Omoto K., Katoh T., Chichvarkhin A., Yagi T. 2004. Molecular systematics and evolution of the ‘Apollo’ butterflies of the genus Parnassius (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Gene 326: 141–147.
Page R.D.M., Holmes E.C. 1998. Molecular Evolution – A Phylogenetic Approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Pedrono M., Smith L.L., Cloberta J., Massota M., Sarrazina F. 2004. Wild-captive metapopulation viability analysis. Biological Conservation 119 (4): 463–473.
Pereira J.M., Itami R.M. 1991. GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression: a study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 57: 1475–1486.
Perzanowska J., Kujawa-Pawlaczyk J. (red.). 2004. Poradniki ochrony siedlisk i gatunków Natura 2000 – podręcznik metodyczny, tom 3: Murawy, łąki, ziołorośla, wrzosowiska, zarośla. Ministerstwo Środowiska, Warszawa.
Peterson R.T. 1996. Your backyard wildlife year: how to attract birds, butterflies and other animals every month of the year. Rodale Press Inc., Emmaus, PA.
Pimbert M.P., Pretty J.N. 2000. Parks, people and profesionalis: putting ‘participation’ into protected- area management. W: Ghmire K.B. Pimbert M.P. (red.). Social changes and conservation. Second edition. Earthscan Publication Limited, London: 297–330.
Prüffer J. 1923. Lepidoptera - Łuskoskrzydłe. W: Poliński W. (red.). Podręcznik do zbierania i konserwowania zwierząt należących do fauny polskiej. Drukarnia i Litografija p.t. „Jan Cotty”, Warszwa: 61–95.
Pucek Z. 1991. History of the European bison and problems of its protection and management W: Bobek B., Perzanowski K., Regelin W. (red.). Global trends in wildlife management. Świat Press, Kraków–Warszawa: 164–184.
Pullin A.S. 2005. Biologiczne podstawy ochrony przyrody. PWN, Warszawa.
Radziejowski J. 2003. Konflikty wokół ochrony przyrody w Polsce W: Czartoszewski J.W. (red.). Konflikty społeczno-ekologiczne. Verbinum 9–35.
Rita H., Ranta E. 1993. On analysing species incidence. Annales Zoologici Fennici 30: 173–176.
Rodgers, A.R. 2001. Tracking animals with GPS: the first 10 years. W: Sibbald A.M., Gordon I.J. (red.). Tracking animals with GPS. The Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen: 1–10.
Rutowski R.L. 1991. The evolution of male mate-location behaviour in butterflies. American Naturalist 138: 1121–1139.
Ruxton G.D., Humphries S. 2001. Rearguard action: why do some butterflies have false heads? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (8): 426–427.
Ruxton G.D., Sherratt T.N., Speed M.P. 2004. Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sarkar S., Pressey R.L., Faith D.P., Margules C.R., Fuller T., Stoms D.M., Moffett A., Kerrie A., Wilson K.A., Williams K.J., Williams P.H., Andelman S. 2006. Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environmental Research. 31: 123–159.
Schultz C.B., Crone E.E. 2005. Patch size and connectivity trescholds for butterfly habitat restoration. Conservation Biology 19 (3): 887–896.
Seams D.E., Powell R.A. 1996. An evaluation of accurancy of the kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77: 2075–2085.
Settele J., Kühn E. 2009. Insect conservation. Science 325 (5936): 41–42.
Sielezniew M. 2012. Uwagi ogólne do monitoringu motyli. W: Makomaska-Juchiewicz M., Baran P. (red.). Monitoring gatunków zwierząt. Przewodnik metodyczny. Część II. Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Warszawa: 95–105.
Siła-Nowicki M. 1865. Motyle Galicyi. Drukarnia Instytutu Stauropigiańskiego, Lwów.
Simmons L. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insect. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Skalski A.W. 1992. Parnassius mnemosyne (L.) niepylak mnemozyna. W: Głowaciński Z. (red.). Polska czerwona księga zwierząt. Państw. Wydawn. Roln. i Leśne, Warszawa: 265–267.
Small R.D.S. 2007. Becoming unsustainable? Recent trends in the formal sector of insect trading in Papua New Guinea. Oryx 41: 386–389.
Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. 1981. Biometry: Principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Second edition. W.H. Freeman Co., New York.
Southwood T.R.E. 1966. Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insectvpopulations. Methuen, London.
Spitzer K. 2012. Insect conservation development in Central Europe. W: New T.R. (red.). Insect conservation: past, perfect and prospect. Springer, Dorhester, NewYork, London: 303–316.
Starzyk J.R. 2004. Rosalia alpina (Linnaeus, 1758), Nadobnica alpejska. W: Głowaciński Z., Nowacki J. (red.). Polska czerwona księga zwierząt. Bezkręgowce. IOP PAN Kraków, AR Poznań: 148–149.
Steel R.G.D. 1961. Some rank sum multiple comparisons tests. Biometrics 17: 539–552.
Stockley P. 1997. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptation for sperm competition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 154–159.
Styskal M. 2005. Dynamika populacji niepylaka mnemozyny w okolicy Ustrzyk Dolnych. Praca magisterska – maszynopis w bibliotece Wydziału Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Chemii UJ, Kraków.
Sutcliffe O. L., Thomas C.D., Peggie D. 1997. Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes. Oecologia 109: 229–234.
Święcicki W.K., Surma M., Koziara W., Skrzypczak G., Szukała J., Bartkowiak-Broda I., Zimny J., Banaszak Z., Marciniak K. 2011. Nowoczesne technologie w produkcji roślinnej – przyjazne dla człowieka i środowiska. Polish Journal of Agronomy 7: 102–112.
Tampion J., Tampion M. 1999. The living tropical greenhouse. Lewes, GMC Publications Ltd., East Sussex.
Thomas C.D., Jones T.M. 1993. Partial recovery of a skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) from population refuges: lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Animal Ecology 62: 472–481.
Thomas C.D., Thomas J.A., Warren M.S. 1992. Distribution of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92: 563–567.
Thomas J. 2001. Butterfly conservation in practice – some case studies. Referat wygłoszony w ramach Conference Natura 2000: Pan-European Management of Butterflies of the Habitats Directive (FFH). Laufen/Germany, w dniu 19.10.2001.
Thomas J.A. 1984. The conservation of butterflies in temporate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future. W: Vane-Wright R.I., Ackery P.R. (red.). The biology of butterflies. Symposium of the Royal Entomological Society 11. Academic Press, London: 333–353.
Thomas J.A. 1989. The Ecological lessons from the re-introduction of Lepidoptera. The Entomology 108: 56–68.
Thomas J.A., Simcox D.J., Clarke R.T. 2009. Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea Butterfly. Science 325 (5936): 80–83.
Thomas J.A., Wardlaw J.C. 1990. The effect of queen ants on the survival of Maculinea arion larvae in Myrmica nat nest. Oecologia 85: 87–91.
Todisco V., Gratton P., Cesaroni D., Sbordoni V. 2010. Phylogeography of Parnassius apollo: hints on taxonomy and conservation of a vulnerable glacial butterfly invader. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 101 (1):169–183.
Tolman T. 1997. Butterflies of Europe. Princeton University Press, Oxford.
Välimäki P, Itämies J. 2005. Effects of canopy coverage on the immature stages of the Clouded Apollo butterfly [Parnassius mnemosyne (L.)] with observations on larval behaviour. Entomologica Fennica 16: 117–123.
Välimäki P., Itämies J. 2003. Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats – effect of patch characteristics. Ecography 26: 679–691.
Vallin A., Jakobsson S., Lind J., Wiklund C. 2006. Variation in antipredator behaviour in three closely related butterfly species – experiments with blue tits as predators on peacocks, small tortoiseshells and commas. Behavioral 59: 455–459.
Vallin A., Jakobsson S., Wiklund C. 2007. “An eye for an eye?” – on the generality of the intimidating quality of eyespots in a butterfly and a hawkmoth Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61 (9): 1419–1424.
Valtonen A., Saarinen K., Jantunen J. 2006 Effect of mowing regime on butterflies and diurnal moths along road verges: how to maintain biodiversity? Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 29 (2): 318–329.
van Nouhuys S., Hanski I. 2002. Colonization rates and distances of a host butterfly and two specific parasitoids in a fragmented landscape. J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 639–650.
Vera F.W.M. 2000. Grazing ecology and forest history. CABI Publishing Wallingford.
Vlašánek P. , Hauck D., Konvička M. 2009. Adult sex ratio in the Parnassius mnemosyne butterfly: effects of survival, migration, and weather. Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution. 55 (3): 233–252.
Vlašánek P., Konvička M. 2009. Sphragis in Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): male-derived insemination plugs loose efficiency with progress of female flight. Biologia 64 (6): 1206–1211.
Watkinson A.R., Sutherland W.J. 1995. Sources sinks and pseudo-sinks. Journal of. Animal Ecology 64: 126–130.
Wedel N. 2005. Female reproductivity in butterflies and moths. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 3433–3440.
Wedel N., Kvarnemo C., Lessels C.M., Tregenza T. 2006. Sexual conflict and the life histories. Animal Behaviour 77: 999–1011.
Weiss J.C. 1991. The Parnassiinae of the World. Part 1. Sciences Nat Venette France: 1–48.
Weiss J.C. 1992. The Parnassiinae of the World. Part 2. Sciences Nat, Venette, France: 49–136.
Wiklund C., Vallin A., Friberg M., Jakobsson S. 2008. Rodent predation on hibernating peacock and small tortoiseshell butterflies. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology 62: 379–389.
Wiśniewski J. 2001. Owady jako źródło inspiracji w kulturze i sztuce Wiadomości Entomologiczne 20 (1–2): 67–86.
Witkowski Z. 2004. Parnassius mnemosyne Niepylak mnemozyna. W: Gowaciński Z., Nowacki J. (red.). Polska czerwona księga zwierząt. Bezkręgowce. Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN, Kraków: 236–238.
Witkowski Z. 2007. Krajowy plan zarządzania gatunkiem nadobnica alpejska (Rosalia alpina L.). Ministerstwo Środowiska, Warszawa.
Witkowski Z. Adamski P. (red.). 2004. Bezkręgowce. W: Poradnik ochrony siedlisk i gatunków Natura 2000 – podręcznik metodyczny. Tom 6. Gatunki zwierząt (z wyjątkiem ptaków). Ministerstwo Środowiska, Warszawa.
Witkowski Z., Adamski P. 1996. Decline and rehabilitation of the apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Pieniny National Park (Polish Carpathians). W: Settele J., Margules C.R., Poschlod P., Henle K. (red.). Species survival in fragmented landscapes. Kluver Academic Publishers., Wageningen: 7–14.
Witkowski Z.J., Adamski P. 2002. Biodiversity conservation in agriculture: the experience of Poland. Nature Conservation 59 (2): 99–108.
Witkowski Z.J., Michalik S. Adamski P. 2004. Conservation of the marginal areas in protected territories: the Ojców National Park – case study. Ekológia (Bratislava) 23 (1): 44–56.
Woś A., Zegar J.S. 2002. Rolnictwo społecznie zrównoważone. Instytut Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Gospodarki Żywnościowej, Warszawa.
Wrbka T., Schindler S., Pollheimer M., Schmitzberger I., Peterseil J. 2008. Impact of the Austrian agri-environmental scheme on diversity of landscapes, plants and birds. Community Ecology 9 (2): 217–227.
Zając A., Zając M. (red.) 2001. Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce. Pracownia Chorologii Komputerowej Instytut Botaniki UJ, Kraków.
Zając T., Bielański W., Solarz W. 2011. Territory choice during the breeding tenure of male sedge warblers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65 (12): 2305–2317.
Zając T., Solarz W., Bielański W. 2006. Adaptive settlement in sedge warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus – focus on the scale of individuals. Acta Oecologica-International 29 (2): 123–134.

Relation:

Studia Naturae

Volume:

Nr 61

Start page:

1

End page:

65

Detailed Resource Type:

Journal ; Article : original article

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:183670

Source:

Bibl. IOP PAN, sygn. F 11, II 334/cz, II 335/cz

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Science

Original in:

Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Science

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

Access:

Open

Object collections:

Last modified:

Sep 14, 2022

In our library since:

Apr 18, 2021

Number of object content downloads / hits:

41

All available object's versions:

https://rcin.org.pl/iop/publication/125639

Show description in RDF format:

RDF

Show description in RDFa format:

RDFa

Show description in OAI-PMH format:

OAI-PMH

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information