Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane
Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane
Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane
Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane
Wyszukiwanie zaawansowane
Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla
Wydanie I. ; 336 stron ; 25 cm ; Indeks ; Streszczenie angielskie.
While a main reference point in the present book is a hypothesis of conquest, it does not mean that other “theories and hypotheses” are being omitted, including those which for a long time were regarded by numerous historians at least as the “only right ones” if not “the only scientific ones”. Thus, besides the hypotheses of conquest, conforming to an event-driven convention (a one-time act), I have also taken into account processual-evolutionary approaches, including Marxist ones, as well as “mixed” concepts – in one way or another combining these opposed approaches. All things considered, this is a book about the frequently visited but at the same time the least illuminated corner of our (Polish) past, mainly due to the scarcity of written sources and their character allowing for various discrepant interpretations. My presentation of concepts of the birth of the Polish state resulting from one or many conquests of intra- or extra-ethnic character occurring in the Polish historical thought I begin with the emergence of the so-called critical historiography, i.e. the second half of the eighteenth century, and finish with the “official” historiography of the Polish People’s Republic. What has happened since that time cannot be regarded as a “closed” period making it possible, broadly speaking, to unemotionally grasp new trends or to present them in a way that would eliminate the subjectivity of the authors. It does not mean, however, that I have totally ignored “our times”. In the closing part of the book I venture to present certain preliminary remarks on historiographical tendencies from the most recent past. The hypothesis of conquest that led to the formation of the Polish state made and still makes a peculiar phantom of our historiography. It was emerging and establishing in the ideology and political thought of the Enlightenment period, and then occurred in various forms in the historiography of the 19th century, but also disappeared almost completely, like during the closing decades of that century, in the interwar period, and in People’s Poland. Neither has it been especially evident in the post-socialist phase, but it seems to be re-emerging from the dark shadows, mainly in the form of internal conquest (revolution, breakthrough), regarded usually as one of the elements of the state-building process.
oai:rcin.org.pl:140138 ; 978-83-65880-55-0
IH PAN, sygn. II.14725 ; IH PAN, sygn. II.14724 Podr. ; kliknij tutaj, żeby przejść
Licencja Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0
Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. [CC BY-ND 4.0 Międzynarodowe] Korzystanie dozwolone zgodnie z licencją Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa-Bez utworów zależnych 4.0, której pełne postanowienia dostępne są pod adresem: ; -
Instytut Historii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Biblioteka Instytutu Historii PAN
17 wrz 2025
21 wrz 2020
1553
https://rcin.org.pl/publication/174023
| Nazwa wydania | Data |
|---|---|
| Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1942- ), Jak powstało państwo polskie? : hipoteza podboju w historiografii polskiej XIX i XX wieku | 17 wrz 2025 |
Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1942–2022)
Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1942–2022)
Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1942–2022)
Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1942–2022)
Wisner, Henryk (1936–2025) Czapliński, Władysław (1905–1981) Żurawicka, Janina ( –2006) Czepulis-Rastenis, Ryszarda (1928–1994) Goldberg, Jakub (1924–2011) Bitner, Wacław (1893–1981)
Domańska, Ewa Górny, Maciej (1976– ) Kornat, Marek (1971– ) Kosiński, Krzysztof (1974– ) Piasek, Wojciech Pleskot, Patryk (1980– ) Romek, Zbigniew Rutkowski, Tadeusz Paweł (1965– ) Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1942–2022) Wróbel, Piotr (1952– )
Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1942–2022)
Paskudzki, Jarosław Wierzbicki, Andrzej (1942–2022) Winnicki, Zdzisław Julian (1949– ) Eisler, Jerzy (1952– )