21 cm ; Pol. text, eng. summary
1. J. Woronczak, Z badań nad wierszem Biernata z Lublina, „Pamiętnik Literacki” 1958 z. 3, s. 97-118.
2. J. Woronczak, Zasada budowy wiersza „Kroniki Dalimila”, „Pamiętnik Literacki” 1963 z. 2, s. 469-478.
3. J. Sambor. Słowa i liczby, Ossolineum, Wrocław 1972.
4. Poetyka i matematyka, red. M.R. Mayenowa, PIW, Warszawa 1965.
5. B. Ycart, Alberti’s letter counts, „Literary and Linguisting Computing” (2013), doi: 10.1093/llc/ fqt034. First published online: June 22, 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt034
6. H. Love, Attributing authorship: an introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002, s. 18-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511483165
7. S.I. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla i jego traktat o donacji Konstantyna, przeł. A. Dudzińska-Facca, Wydawnictwo IFiS. PAN, Warszawa 1997
8. W. Lutosławki, The origin and growth of Plato’s logic: with an account of Plato’s style and of the chronology of his writings, Longmans, London 1897.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009840x00030651
9. A. Pawłowski, A. Pacewicz Wincenty Lutosławski (1863-1954). Philosophe, helléniste ou fondateur sous-estimé de la stylométrie?, „Historiographia Linguistica” 2004 no. 21, s. 423-447.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.31.2-3.10paw
10. J. Burrows, Computation into criticism: A study of Jane Austen’s novels and an experiment in method, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1987.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3508082
11. F. Moretti, Graphs, maps, trees: abstract models for a literary history, Verso, London–New York 2005; F. Moretti Distant Reading, Verso, London–New York 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cql045
12. M. Jockers, Macroanalysis: digital methods and literary history, University of Illinois Press, Urbana–Chicago–Springfield 2013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt056
13. C. Stamou, Stylochronometry: stylistic development, sequence of composition, and relative dating, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2008 no. 23, s. 181-199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm029
14. D. Hoover, Modes of composition in Henry James: dictation, style, and ‘What Maisie Knew’, w: Digital Humanities 2009: Conference Abstracts, University of Maryland, College Park 2009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hjr.2014.0024
15. J. Burrows, The Englishing of Juvenal: computational stylistics and translated texts, „Style” 2002 no. 36, s. 677-699.
16. J. Rybicki, The great mystery of the (almost) invisible translator: stylometry in translation, w: Quantitative Methods in Corpus-Based Translation Studies, ed. M. Oakes, M,. Ji, John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.51.09ryb
17. J. Rybicki, Stylometryczna niewidzialność tłumacza, „Przekładaniec” 2013, s. 61-87.
18. C. Schöch, Fine-tuning stylometric tools: investigating authorship and genre in French classical theater, w: Digital Humanities 2013: Book of Abstracts, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 2013.
19. M. Kestemont, K. Luyckx, W. Daelemans, T. Crombez, Cross-genre authorship verification using unmasking, „English Studies” 2012 no. 93, s. 340-356.
20. N. Chomsky, Syntactic structures, Mouton, The Hague 1975.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110218329
21. J.W. Pennabaker The secret life of pronouns: what our words say about us, Bloomsbury Press, New York etc. 2011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(11)62167-2
22. M. Eder, Mind your corpus: systematic errors in authorship attribution, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2013 no. 28, s. 603-614.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt039
23. F. Mosteller, D.L. Wallace, Inference and disputed authorship: the federalist. Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass.) 1964.
http://dx.doi.org/10.23,.07/202633
24. E. Stamatatos, A survey of modern authorship attribution methods, „Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology” 2009 no. 60, s. 538-556.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21001
25. M. Eder. Style-markers in authorship attribution: a cross-language study of the authorial fingerprint, „Studies in Polish Linguistics” 2011 no. 6, s. 99-114.
26. D. Hoover, Statistical stylistic and authorship attribution: an empirical investigation, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2001 no. 16, s. 421-444.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/16.4.421
27. J. Burrows, ‘Delta’: a measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2002 no. 17, 267- -287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/17.3.267
28. P. Juola, Authorship attribution, „Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval” 2006 no. 1, s. 233-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1500000005
29. M. Koppel, J. Schler, S. Argamon, Computational methods in authorship attribution, „Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology” 2009 no. 60, s. 9-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20961
30. E. Paradis, J. Claude, K. Strimmer, APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language, „Bioinformatics” 2004 no. 20, s. 289-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412
31. M. Dunn, A. Terril, G. Reesink, R.A. Foley, S.C. Levinson, Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history, „Science” 2005 no. 309, s. 2072-2075.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1114615
32. M. Eder, Computational stylistics and Biblical translation: how reliable can a dendrogram be?, w: The translator and the computer, ed. T. Piotrowski, Ł. Grabowski, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Filologicznej, Wrocław 2013.
33. J. Rybicki, M. Heydel, The stylistics and stylometry of collaborative translation: Woolf’s Night and Day in Polish, „Literary and Linguistic Computing” 2013 no. 28, s. 708-717.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt027
34. K. van Dalen-Oskam, Epistolary voices: the case of Elisabeth Wolff and Agatha Dekken, w: Digital Humanities 2013: Book of Abstracts, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln 2013, s. 451-453.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu023
35. A.-L. Barabási, Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life, Plume, New York 2003.
36. M.E. Newman, A.-L. Barabási, D.J. Watts, The structure and dynamics of networks, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2006.
37. R. Ferrer i Cancho, The structure of syntactic dependency networks: insights from recent advances in network theory, w: Problems of Quantitative Linguistics, ed. G. Altmann, V. Levickij, V. Perebyinis, RAM-Verlag, Lüdenscheld 2005, s. 60-75.
38. R. Ferrer i Cancho, R.V. Solé, R. Köhler Patterns in syntactic dependency networks, „Physical Review E” 2004 no. 69, 051915, s. 1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.69.051915
39. M.E. Newman, Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices, „Physical Review E” 2006 no. 74, 036104, s. 14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreve.74.036104
40. A. Lancichinetti, R. Radicchi, J.J. Ramasco, S. Fortunato, Finding statistically significant communities in networks, „PLoS ONE” 2011 no. 6, s. 17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018961
41. M. Eder, Visualization in stylometry: some reliability issues (w druku).
42. J. Rybicki, Pierwszy rzut oka na stylometryczną mapę literatury polskiej, „Teksty Drugie” 2014 nr 2.
oai:rcin.org.pl:59775 ; 0867-0633 ; 10.18318/td.
IBL PAN, call no. P.I.2524 ; click here to follow the link
Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms
Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Library of the Institute of Literary Research PAS
Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund
Apr 4, 2024
Sep 22, 2016
3966
https://rcin.org.pl/publication/78492
Edition name | Date |
---|---|
Eder M. - Metody ścisłe w literaturoznawstwie i pułapki pozornego obiektywizmu – przykład stylometrii | Apr 4, 2024 |
Eder, Maciej
Tarwid, Kazimierz