Object structure

Title:

Rozrost terytorialny dużych miast w Polsce = Territorial development of large cities in Poland

Subtitle:

Przegląd Geograficzny T. 92 z. 4 (2020)

Creator:

Szmytkie, Robert : Autor

Role:

Szmytkie, Robert : Autor

Affiliation:

Szmytkie, Robert : Uniwersytet Wrocławski Instytut Geografii i Rozwoju Regionalnego

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Date issued/created:

2020

Description:

24 cm

Type of object:

Journal/Article

Subject and Keywords:

territorial expansion ; spatial development ; development cycle ; large cities

Abstract:

The primary aim of the study was to identify the process of territorial expansion and spatial development in large cities of Poland: Wrocław, Warsaw and Cracow. This denoted the gathering of information on changes in administrative boundaries as well as population in the cities referred to – from the 13th century all the way through to modern times. The research hypothesis adopted was that cities expand their territories gradually, with each extension of administrative boundaries following a specific pattern and reflecting social and economic growth. The territorial development of a city (territorial change) thus relates to growth (change) in the administrative area, often in the form of expansion in relation to a widening of administrative boundaries, but with narrowing also possible. The spatial development of the city in turn follows the development of urbanised areas both within the boundaries and in the immediate vicinity of the given city. The study was inspired by observations on the specific nature of territorial growth in Wrocław and other large cities in Poland, for which analysis revealed some regularities to the settlement processes during different historical periods. Firstly, changes in the administrative boundaries of large cities followed a pulsatile pattern, with consecutive modifications alternating with periods of stability of variable length. Secondly, the territorial expansion of a city usually came after a period of dynamic social and economic growth both within existing boundaries and in the surrounding zone connected closely with the city and transformed under its influence. In turn, most longer periods in which boundaries were stable corresponded to periods of social and economic stagnation in the given city. Thirdly, the boundaries of cities changed when a certain climax point of population density was exceeded, and the city could no longer grow within its existing boundaries. Each extension contributed to an increase in the administered area and to population growth, albeit with populati n density decreasing considerably – in statistical terms – given the incorporation of new, less-urbanised areas offering free (potential) land for further urban growth. Fourthly, the sequence of development processes and their specific repeatability are cyclical in nature, and consecutive cycles are seen to end successive stages involving the extension of cities’ administrative boundaries. A single cycle of changes in the administrative boundaries of the city consists of five basic phases. Phase I is the initial phase, which takes place at the moment of foundation of a city, or in the case of subsequent cycles – when there is extension of the city limits. During phase II the number of residents and population density within the city borders increase as a result of socio-economic growth. During phase III population density within the city boundaries continues to increase, and after reaching the limit of its growth potential the city sprawls to the nearest neighbourhood. During phase IV the impact of the city n its neighbourhood stimulates further development of the suburbs. This process may also often encompass suburban villages or smaller towns strongly connected with the city. During phase V the functional link between the city and its neighbourhood (suburbs) is so strong that the administrative boundaries are extended to include suburban areas that represent a natural extension of the city. This contributes to an increase in area and population growth, as well as to a major decrease in population density within the new boundaries. This phase is at the same time the initial phase for the next cycle of a city’s spatial and territorial development. The above described cyclical pattern of territorial growth concerns a specific group of cities – monocentric regional centres developing as a result of the influence of centripetal forces in the physicalism and functional approach.

References:

Anas, A., Arnott, R., & Small, K.A. (1998). Urban Spatial Structure. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1426‑1464.
Andrusz, G. (1996). Structural change and boundary instability. W: G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, &I. Szelenyi (red.), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (s. 30‑69). Malden: Blackwell. DOI
Arnott, R.J. (1980). A simple urban growth model with durable housing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 10(1), 53‑76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166‑0462(80)90048‑4 DOI
Baranowska, M. (2007). Koncepcja zjawiska fringe belt. W: I. Jażdżewska (red.), Polska geografia osadnictwa, dotychczasowy dorobek, program badań. XX Konwersatorium wiedzy o mieście (s. 177‑183). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Barke, M. (1976). Land use succession: a factor in fringe-belt modification. Area, 8(4), 303‑306. https://doi.org/10.2307/212588 DOI
Barras, R. (2009). Building cycles: growth and instability. John Wiley & Sons. DOI
Bartoszewicz, H. (2003). Rozwój przestrzenny Warszawy w latach 1800‑1914 w świetle źródeł kartograficznych. Warszawa: Mazowiecka Wyższa Szkoła Humanistyczno-Pedagogiczna.
Borsdorf, A., Hidalgo, R., & Sánchez, R. (2007). A new model of urban development in Latin America: The gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valparaíso. Cities, 24(5), 365‑378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.002 DOI
Brade, I., Herfert, G., & Wiest, K. (2009). Recent trends and future prospects of socio-spatial differentiation in urban regions of Central and Eastern Europe: A lull before the storm? Cities, 26(5), 233‑244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2009.05.001 DOI
Brezdeń, P., & Szmytkie, R. (2019). Current changes in the location of industry in the suburban zone of a post-socialist city. Case study of Wrocław (Poland). Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 110(2), 102‑122. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12339 DOI
Brueckner, J.K. (2000). Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review, 23(2), 160‑171. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001700761012710 DOI
Burgess, E.W. (1924). The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project. Publications of the American Sociological Society, 18, 85‑97.
Carter, H., & Wheatley, S. (1979). Fixation lines and fringe belts, land uses and social areas: nineteenth-century change in the small town. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 4(2), 214‑238. https://doi.org/10.2307/622036 DOI
Clark, C. (1951). Urban Population Densities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 114(4), 490‑496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2981088 DOI
Conzen, M.R.G. (1960). Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Transactions and Papers of Institute of British Geographers, 27. https://doi.org/10.2307/621094 DOI
Crowley, D., & Reid, S.E. (red.). (2002). Socialist spaces: Sites of everyday life in the Eastern Bloc. Oxford: Berg. DOI
Daniel, P., & Hopkinson, M. (1989). The Geography of Settlement. Conceptual Frameworks in Geography. Edinburg: Oliver & Boyd.
Ducom, E. (2003). Fringe belts and planning: a French example. Urban Morphology, 7(2), 103‑104.
Elkins, T.H., & Hofmeister, B. (1988). Berlin: The spatial structure of a divided city. New York: Meuthen.
Enyedi, G., & Szirmai, V. (1992). Budapest. A Central European Capital. London: Belhaven Press.
Escher, F. (1985). Berlin und sein Umland. Zur Genese der Berliner Stadtlandschaft bis zum Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Colloquium Verlag.
Grzeszczak, J. (1996). Tendencje kontrurbanizacyjne w krajach Europy Zachodniej. Prace Geograficzne, 167, Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN.
Haggett, P. (1972). Geography: a modern synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.
Hall, P. (1971). Spatial structure of metropolitan England and Wales. W: M. Chisholm, & G. Manners (red.), Spatial policy problems of the British economy (s. 96‑125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI
Hall, P.G. (1998). Cities in civilization. New York: First Fromm International.
Hall, T., & Barrett, H. (2012). Urban geography. London: Routledge. DOI
Harris, C.D., & Ullman, E.L. (1945). The Nature of Cities. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 242, 7‑17. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624524200103 DOI
Harris, R., & Larkham, P.J. (1999). Changing suburbs: Foundation, Form and Function. London: Stage.
Hirt, S. (2013). Whatever happened to the (post) socialist city? Cities, 32, 29‑38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.010 DOI
Hirt, S., & Stanilov, K. (2009). Twenty years of transition: The evolution of urban planning in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, 1989‑2009. Nairobi: Human Settlements Global Dialogue Series.
Horwood, E.M., & Boyce, R.R. (1959). Studies of the central business district and urban freeway development. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Hoyt, H. (1939). The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Washington: Federal Housing Administration.
Isard, W. (1942). A neglected cycle: the transport-building cycle. Review of Economic Statistics, 24(4), 149‑158. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927670 DOI
Klaassen, L.H., & Paelinck, J.H.P. (1979). The future of large towns. Environment and Planning A, 11(10), 1095‑1104. https://doi.org/10.1068/a111095 DOI
Korcelli, P. (1969). Rozwój struktury przestrzennej obszarów metropolitalnych Kalifornii. Prace Geograficzne, 78. Warszawa: IG PAN .
Królikowski, L., & Ostrowski, M. (2009). Rozwój przestrzenny Warszawy. Warszawa: Mazowieckie Centrum Kultury i Sztuki.
Krugman, P.R. (1997). Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
Krzysztofik, R. (2014). Geneza aglomeracji miast na obszarze Polski. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Krzysztofik, R., Tkocz, M., Spórna, T., & Kantor-Pietraga, I. (2016). Some dilemmas of post-industrialism in a region of traditional industry: The case of the Katowice conurbation, Poland. Moravian Geographical Reports, 24(1), 42‑54. https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016‑0004 DOI
Kubeš, J. (2013). European post-socialist cities and their near hinterland in intra-urban geography literature. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 19, 19‑43. https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2013‑0002 DOI
Lawton, R. (1972). An age of great cities. Town Planning Review, 43(3), 199‑224. DOI
de Long, J.B., &Shleifer, A. (1993). Princes and merchants: European city growth before the industrial revolution. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(2), 671‑702. https://doi.org/10.1086/467294 DOI
Louis, H. (1936). Die geographische Gliederung von Gross-Berlin. W: H. Louis, & W. Panzer (red.), Landerkundliche Forschung: Krebs-Festschrift (s. 146‑171). Stuttgart: Engelhorn.
Mann, P.H. (1965). An Approach to Urban Sociology. London: Routledge.
Malisz, B. (1966). Zarys teorii kształtowania układów osadniczych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Arkady.
Markowski, T., & Marszał, T. (2006). Metropolie, obszary metropolitalne, metropolizacja: problemy i pojęcia podstawowe. Warszawa: Komitet Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Kraju PAN.
Miszewska, B. (1996). Struktura morfologiczna peryferyjnych osiedli Wrocławia. Prace Instytutu Geograficznego, Seria B: Geografia Społeczna i Ekonomiczna, 14, 53‑61.
Miszewska, B. (2002). Ehemalige Dörfer als genetische Kerne im heutigen Stadtgefüge der Großstadt Breslau. Siedlungsforschung, 20, 293‑306.
Miszewska, B., & Szmytkie, R. (2015). Morphological processes in the spatial structure of the southern district of Wrocław city. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 27, 133‑151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2015‑0009 DOI
Morris, A.E.J. (2013). History of urban form before the industrial revolution. London: Routledge. DOI
Motak, M. (2012). Historia rozwoju urbanistycznego Krakowa w zarysie. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej.
Musiaka, Ł., Figlus, T., & Szmytkie, R. (2020). Models of morphological transformations of centres of the largest Polish cities after World War II. European Planning Studies (online first). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1744529 DOI
Mydel, R. (1979). Rozwój struktury przestrzennej miasta Krakowa. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Nagy, E., & Timár, J. (2012). Urban restructuring in the grip of capital and politics: Gentrification in East-Central Europe. W: T. Csapó, & A. Balogh (red.), Development of the Settlement Network in the Central European Countries (s. 121‑135). Berlin - Heidelberg: Springer. DOI
Newling, B.E. (1966). Urban Growth and Spatial Structure: Mathematical Models and Empirical Evidence. Geographical Review, 56(2), 213‑225. https://doi.org/10.2307/212879 DOI
Pacione, M. (2001). Urban geography: A global perspective. New York: Routledge. DOI
Rees, P.H. (1970). The factorial ecology of metropolitan Chicago. W: J.L. Berry, F.E. Horton, &J.O. Abiodun (red.), Geographic perspectives on urban systems (s. 146‑150). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Riggleman, J.R. (1933). Building cycles in the United States, 1875-1932. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 28, 174‑183. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1933.10502255 DOI
Robson, B.T. (2012). Urban growth: an approach. London: Routledge. DOI
Semotanová, E. (2010). Prostor města a jeho fázový růst v českých zemích od konce 19. století. Historická geografie (Historical Geography), 36(2), 225‑254.
Sjöberg, G. (1960). The Pre-industrial City: Past, Present and Future. New York: Free Press.
Stanilov, K. (2007). Taking stock of post-socialist urban development: A recapitulation. W: K. Stanilov (red.), The post-socialist city: urban form and space transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism (s. 3‑17). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI
Stewig, R. (1983). Die Stadt in Industrie-und Entwicklungsländern. Wien: Schöningh.
Sýkora, L. (1999). Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague. GeoJournal, 49(1), 79‑89. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1007076000411 DOI
Sýkora, L., & Ouředníček, M. (2007). Sprawling post-communist metropolis: Commercial and residential suburbanization in Prague, Brno, the Czech Republic. The Geo Journal Library, 91, 209‑233. DOI
Szmytkie, R. (2011). Osiedla wiejskie w granicach administracyjnych dużego miasta (przykład Wrocławia). Studia Miejskie, 3, 159‑186.
Szmytkie, R. (2019). Zmiany granic administracyjnych miast w Polsce w latach 1990‑2017 i ich wpływ na wielkość zaludnienia. Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście, 4(32), 19‑34. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2543‑9421.04.02 DOI
Szmytkie, R., & Krzysztofik, R. (2019). The processes of incorporation and secession of urban and suburban municipalities: The case of Poland. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 73(2), 110‑127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1604567 DOI
Szymańska, D., Grzelak-Kostulska, E., & Hołowiecka, B. (2006). Zmiany powierzchni i gęstości zaludnienia miast Polski w latach 1960‑2003. W: J. Słodczyk, & E. Szafranek (red.), Kierunki przekształceń struktury gospodarczej i społeczno-demograficznej miast (s. 341‑353). Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego.
Szymańska, D., Grzelak-Kostulska, E., & Hołowiecka, B. (2009). Polish towns and the changes in their areas and population densities. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 11, 15‑30. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10089‑008‑0018‑2 DOI
Śleszyński, P. (2018). Problem podziału terytorialnego Obszaru Metropolitalnego Warszawy i wnioski dla Polski. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 2(72), 29‑47. https://doi.org/10.7366/1509499527202 DOI
Tosics, I. (2006). Spatial restructuring in post-socialist Budapest. W: S. Tsenkova, & Z. Nedovic-Budic (red.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe (s. 131‑150). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. DOI
Ünlü, T. (2013). Thinking about urban fringe belts: a Mediterranean perspective. Urban Morphology, 17(1), 5‑20.
Werwicki, A. (1973). Struktura przestrzenna średnich miast ośrodków wojewódzkich w Polsce. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.
Whitehand, J.W. (1967). Fringe belts: a neglected aspect of urban geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41, 223‑233. https://doi.org/10.2307/621338 DOI
Whitehand, J.W. (1972). Building cycles and the spatial pattern of urban growth. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 56, 3955. https://doi.org/10.2307/621541 DOI
Whitehand, J.W.R. (1988). Urban fringe belts: development of an idea. Planning Perspectives, 3(1), 47‑58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665438808725651 DOI
Whitehand, J.W.R. (1994). Development cycles and urban landscapes. Geography, 79(1), 3‑17.
Wilski, J. (1993). Warszawa. Rozwój przestrzenny. Warszawa: Oddział Warszawski Towarzystwa Urbanistów Polskich.

Relation:

Przegląd Geograficzny

Volume:

92

Issue:

4

Start page:

499

End page:

520

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

2300-8466 (on-line) ; 10.7163/PrzG.2020.4.3

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: