Object structure
Title:

Cyfrowi przedsiębiorcy przemysłu 4.0 w przestrzeni Polski = The Geography of Digital Entrepreneurs in Industry 4.0 in Poland

Subtitle:

Przegląd Geograficzny T. 94 z. 3 (2022)

Creator:

Gwosdz, Krzysztof : Autor ORCID ; Sobala-Gwosdz, Agnieszka : Autor ORCID ; Hetmańczyk, Katarzyna : Autor ORCID

Affiliation:

Gwosdz, Krzysztof : Uniwersytet Jagielloński Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej ; Sobala-Gwosdz, Agnieszka : Instytut Rozwoju Miast i Regionów ; Hetmańczyk, Katarzyna : Uniwersytet Jagielloński Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Date issued/created:

2022

Description:

24 cm

Subject and Keywords:

Industry 4.0 ; geography of innovation ; clusering of high-tech sectors ; Poland

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to identify the geography of companies offering Industry 4.0 technologies (digital entrepreneurs), and to determine the territorial potential to develop future clusters of these activities in Poland. The identification of spatial clusters was performed on the basis of a multistage procedure, using dispersed and big data sets, based on the prevailing classification codes of economic activities and location quotient. It was found that digital entrepreneurs of Industry 4.0 show a strong concentration in a small number of cities and counties, and first of all in the core cities of the largest Polish metropolises. Strong concentration is shown especially by software and engineering services, as well as companies distributing specialised machinery and equipment. The greatest prospects for development in non-metropolitan areas are displayed by suppliers of 4.0 technologies connected with production of machines and devices and dealing with their installation and integration. Heterogeneity of Industry 4.0 technologies enables individual cities and regions, on the basis of well-recognised own potential, explore different paths of local development connected with Industry 4.0 technologies.

References:

Adler, P. & Florida, R. (2021). The rise of urban tech: how innovations for cities come from cities. Regional Studies, 55(10‑11), 1787‑1800. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947 DOI
Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905‑917. DOI
Arthur, B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical small events. Economic Journal, 99(394), 116‑131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234208 DOI
Balland, P.A., & Rigby, D. (2017). The Geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 93(1), 1‑23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1205947 DOI
Balland, P.A., & Boschma, R. (2021). Mapping the potentials of regions in Europe to contributeto new knowledge production in Industry 4.0 technologies. Regional Studies. 55(10‑11),1652‑1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1900557 DOI
Baron, M. (2016). Open innovation in old industrial regions. Does old mean closed?. The International Society for Professional Innovation Management Conference Proceedings, 1‑9. Manchester: ISPIM.
Benko, G. (1993). Geografia Technopolii, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Boschma, R.A. (1997). New industries and windows of locational opportunity. A long-term analysis of Belgium. Erdkunde, 51(1), 12‑22. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.1997.01.02 DOI
Brodny, J. (red.). (2021). Badanie potrzeb i gotowości małopolskich MMŚP do adaptacji rozwiązań właściwych modelowi tzw. Przemysłu 4.0. Kraków: Województwo Małopolskie Departament Nadzoru Właścicielskiego i Gospodarki Zespół ds. Zarządzania Inteligentnymi Specjalizacjami.
Brodzicki, T., Rot, P., Szultka, S., Tamowicz, P., Umiński, S., & Wojnicka, E. (2002). Uwarunkowania rozwoju nowoczesnych technologii w Gdańsku. Gdańsk: Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką Rynkową.
Busch, H.C., Mühl, C., Fuchs, M., & Fromhold-Eisebith, M. (2021). Digital urban production: How does Industry 4.0 reconfigure productive value creation in urban contexts? Regional Studies, 55(10‑11), 1801‑1815. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1957460 DOI
Capello, R. & Lenzi, K. (2021). 4.0 Technologies and the rise of new islands of innovation in European regions. Regional Studies, 55(10‑11), 1724‑1737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1964698 DOI
Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49(5), 767‑781. DOI
Castellacci, F. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 37(6‑7), 978‑994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.011 DOI
Checkland, S.G. (1976). The upas tree, Glasgow 1875‑1975. Glasgow: University of Glasgow Press.
Chiarello, F., Trivelli, L., Bonaccorsi, A. & Fantoni, G. (2018). Extracting and mapping industry 4.0 technologies using Wikipedia. Computers in Industry, 100, 244‑257. DOI
Corradini, C., Santini, E. & Vecciolini, C. (2021). The geography of Industry 4.0 technologies across European regions. Regional Studies, 55(10‑11), 1667‑1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1884216 DOI
De Propris, L., & Bailey, D. (2021). Pathways of regional transformation and Industry 4.0, Regional Studies, 55(10‑11), 1617‑1629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1960962 DOI
De Propris, L., & Bellandi, M. (2021). Regions beyond Industry 4.0, Regional Studies, 55(10‑11), 1609‑1616. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1974374 DOI
De Propros, L., & Bailey, D. (2020). Industry 4.0 and regional transformations. London-New York: Routledge Taylor&Francis Group.
Dimache, A., & Roche, T. (2013), A decision methodology to support servitisation of manufacturing. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(11‑12), 1435‑1457. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2010-0186 DOI
Doliński, A. (2022). Przemysł 4.0. Geneza. Nowoczesny przemysł, 2(2), 4‑8.
Domański, B. (2015) Współczesne procesy przemian regionalnych przemysłu Polski. Prace Komisji Geografii Przemysłu PTG, 29(4), 40‑53. DOI
Drahokoupil, J. (red.). (2020). The challenge of digital transformation in the automotive industry. Jobs, upgrading and the prospects for development. Brussels: ETUI aisbl.
Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. (2001). Methodology for the assessment of competitiveness of selected existing industries. New York: United Nations.
European Commission, (2020). Technologies for Industry. Providing useful guidance to industries, policy makers and academics. Brussels.
Fassio, C., & Nathan, M. (2020). Exploring Industry 4.0 production in Sweden. W: L. De Propris, & D. Bailey (red.), Industry 4.0 and Regional Transformations (s. 133‑151). New York: Routledge. DOI
Frangenheim, A., Trippl, M., & Chlebna, C. (2020). Beyond the Single Path View: Interpath dynamics in regional contexts. Economic Geography, 96(1), 31‑51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378 DOI
Giersberg, D. (2014). Warsztat kreatywności na miarę XXI wieku. Pobrane z: https://www.goethe.de/ins/pl/pl/kul/mag/20440837.html (14.03.2022).
Götz, M. & Gracel, J. (2017). Przemysł czwartej generacji (Industry 4.0) - wyzwania dla badań w kontekście międzynarodowym. Kwartalnik Naukowy Uczelni Vistula, 1(51), 217‑235.
Götz, M. & Jankowska, B. (2017). Clusters and Industry 4.0 - do they fit together?, European Planning Studies, 25(9), 1633‑1653. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1327037 DOI
Götz, M. (2020). Przemysł 4.0 to ewoluująca rewolucja. To nie tylko nowe technologie. Pobrane z: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=3LJsy8PUj5k (21.03.2022).
Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties; the lock-in of regional development in Ruhr area. W: G. Grabher (red.), The embedded firm; on the socioeconomics of industrial networks (s. 255‑277). London-New York: Routledge.
Gracel, J. & Łebkowski, P. (2018). Concept of Industry 4.0-Related Manufacturing Technology Maturity Model (ManuTech Maturity Model - MTMM), Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services, 12(1‑2), 17‑31. DOI
Gwosdz, K. & Micek, G. (2020). Teoria zależności od ścieżki w polskich studiach regionalnych i geografii ekonomicznej. W: W. Jagodziński & W. Rakowski (red.), Szlakami geografii ekonomicznej: przestrzeń, instytucje, metodologia: księga jubileuszowa dedykowana profesorowi Kazimierzowi Kucińskiemu (s. 203‑219). Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Gwosdz, K. (2004). Koncepcja zależności od ścieżki (path dependence) w geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej, Przegląd Geograficzny, 76(4), 433‑456.
Gwosdz, K., Baron, M., Hetmańczyk, K., Sobala-Gwosdz, A., & Szczepanek, R. (2022). Does geographical proximity matter? The role of strategic coupling of automotive industry and digital entrepreneurs as the mechanism of new path creation in Polish regions. Gerpisa colloquium. https://gerpisa.org/node/6846
Gwosdz, K., Micek, G., Kocaj, A., Sobala-Gwosdz, A., & Świgost-Kapocsi, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 and the prospects for domestic automotive suppliers in Poland. W: J. Drahokoupil (red.), The challenge of digital transformation in the automotive industry. Jobs, upgrading and the prospects for development (s. 89‑106). Brussels: ETUI.
Hallward-Driemeier, M., & Nayyar, G. (2017). Trouble in the making? The future of manufacturing-led development. Washington: World Bank. Pobrane z: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/27946 (16.03.2022). DOI
Hardt, D. (2021). Industry 4.0: Evolution or revolution? Interview with David Hardt. W: C. Petersen (red.), Fourth Industrial (R) evolution Blind spots, risks, opportunities, and wildcards in a new era of technological change (s. 8‑13). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Institute for Futures Studies.
Harris, J. (2015). Identifying Science and Technology Businesses in Official Statistics. London: ONS.
Hermann, M., Pentek, T. & Otto, B. (215). Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios. A Literature Review. Technische Universität Dortmund Fakultät Maschinenbau, Working Paper, 1.
Hervas-Oliver, J.L., Di Maria, E., & Bettiol, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 in firms, clusters and regions: the new digital imperative. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31(1), 1‑11. DOI
Hildebrandt, A. Susmarski, P. Tarkowski, M. Wandałowski, M. (2014). Atrakcyjność inwestycyjna województw i podregionów Polski 2014. Gdańsk: Instytut Badań nad Gospodarką Rynkową.
Hoover, E.M. & Vernon, R. (1959). Anatomy of a metropolis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass. DOI
Isserman, A.M. (1977). The Location Quotient Approach to Estimating Regional Economic Impacts. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 43(1), 33‑41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367708977758 DOI
Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Acatech.
Klepper, S. (2002). Capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 645‑666. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.4.645 DOI
Kogler, B. (2021). The digital transformation of SMEs - challenges and opportunities, TO3 Online Thematic Workshop. Pobrane z: https://www.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/plp_uploads/events/Webinars/2021_E-workshop_Digital_transition_of_European_SMEs/Presentation_Koelmel.pdf (15.03.2022).
Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2019). Territorial servitization and the manufacturing renaissance in knowledge-based economies. Regional Studies, 53(3), 313‑319. DOI
Lee, K.F. (2018). AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley and the new world order. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach. Economic Geography, 95(2), 113‑135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294 DOI
Massey, D. (1984). Spatial divisions of labour. London: Macmillan.
McKinsey Global Institute. (2021). The future of work after COVID-19. Pobrane z: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-work-after-covid-19 (17.03.2022).
Ménière, Y. Rudyk, I., & Valdes, J. (2017). Patents and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The inventions behind digital transformation. Munich: European Patent Office.
Micek, G., Gwosdz, K., Kwiatkowski, T., & Panecka-Niepsuj, M. (2017). Nowe branże gospodarki w Krakowie: czynniki i mechanizmy rozwoju. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 320, 18‑45.
Micek, G., Gwosdz, K., Kocaj, A., Sobala-Gwosdz, A., & Świgost-Kapocsi, A. (2022). The role of critical conjunctures in regional path creation: a study of Industry 4.0 in the Silesia region. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 9(1), 23‑44. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2021.2017337 DOI
Ministry of Science London. (2001). Business clusters in the UK - a first assessment - A First Assessment. Report for the Department of Trade and Industry by a consortium led by Trends Business Research. London: DTI Publication.
Morris, R. & Penido, M., 2014, How Did Silicon Valley become Silicon Valley? Three Surprising Lessons for Other Cities and Regions, Endeavor Insight. Pobrane z: https://endeavor.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/How-SV-became-SV.pdf (17.03.2022).
Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237‑265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x DOI
Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. Economic growth, stagnation and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Palmen, L., & Baron, M. (2020). Raport z badania dotyczącego analizy potrzeb w zakresie kluczowych kompetencji MŚP w województwie śląskim według Przemysłu 4.0 oraz oceny poziomu gotowości do Przemysłu 4.0 w zakresie zasobów w przedsiębiorstwach, instytucjach otoczenia biznesu i instytucjach badawczo-rozwojowych, Opracowanie w ramach projektu "40Ready - Strengthening SME capacity to engage in Industry 4.0". Gliwice: Urząd Marszałkowski Województwa Śląskiego, InnoCo Sp. z o.o.
Scott, A.J. & Storper, M. (1987). High technology industry and regional development: A theoretical critique and reconstruction. International Social Science Journal, 112, 215‑232.
Sendler, U. (2016). Potencjalny hit eksportowy Made in Germany. Możliwości, jakie daje nam Przemysł 4.0. W: Wyprzedzajmy swoją epokę (s. 33‑48). Besigheim-Ottmarsheim: Müller - Die lila Logistics AG.
Szalavetz, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 in 'factory economies', W: B. Galgóczi & J. Drahokoupil (red.), Condemned to be left behind? Can Central and Eastern Europe emerge from its low-wage model? (s. 133‑152). Brussels: ETUI.
Szalavetz, A. (2020). Digital entrepreneurs in factory economies. W: J. Drahokoupil (red.), The challenge of digital transformation in the automotive industry: Jobs, upgrading, and the prospects for development (s. 107‑124). Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.

Relation:

Przegląd Geograficzny

Volume:

94

Issue:

3

Start page:

327

End page:

349

Resource type:

Text

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

application/octet-stream

Resource Identifier:

doi:10.7163/PrzG.2022.3.3 ; 0033-2143 (print) ; 2300-8466 (on-line) ; 10.7163/PrzG.2022.3.3

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style: