Since 1990, Polish municipalities have exercised planning power in terms of deciding on the ways of their economic and spatial development. Results of dynamic and sometimes uncontrolled, spontaneous development processes cross the borders of municipalities bringing problems, that can not be addressed, and solved by one municipality. Polish legislation provides legal basis for cooperation of municipalities: they may establish common goals’ unions and associations in order to deal with problems that are important for more than one municipality. However, experience of the last several years proves that cooperation among municipalities is not an easy task. It creates problems especially within functional urban areas, including metropolitan ones. In this paper, the issue of cooperation among municipalities from the Warsaw Metropolitan Area (WMA) is addressed using the perspective of networking and formulation of common development policy.
1. Brown, M.P. (1992), The possibility of local autonomy, Urban Geography, 13, 257–279.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.13.3.257 -
2. Grochowski, M. (2008), Analysis of regional spatial planning and decision making strategies and their impact on land use in the urban fringe; Case study: Warsaw Metropolitan Area, Poland; Report: VI FP UE: Peri-Urban Land Use Relationships – Strategies And Sustainability Assessment Tools For Urban-Rural Linkages, Integrated Project, Warsaw.
3. Grochowski, M. (2009), Samorząd terytorialny a rozwój zrównoważony obszarów metropolitalnych (Self-government and sustainable development of metropolitan areas), Mazowsze, Studia Regionalne, 2, Mazowieckie Biuro Planowania Regionalnego, Warszawa.
4. Grochowski, M., Fuhrmann, M., Pieniążek, M., Wilk, W. Zegar, T. (2005), Warszawa – Obszar Metropolitalny Warszawy – Mazowsze; Relacje międzygminne: współpraca czy obojętność; (Warsaw – the Warsaw Metropolitan Area – Mazovian region: Inter-municipal relations: cooperation or neutrality), Samorząd Terytorialny, 7–8, Wyd. Kik, Oddział Wydawnictw Profesjonalnych Sp. z o.o., Warszawa.
5. Herschell, T. and Newman, P. (2002), Governance of Europe's city regions: Planning, policy, and politics, Routledge, London.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203446683 -
6. Hulst, R. and van Montfort, A. (eds.) (2007), Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe, Springer, Dordrecht.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5379-7 -
7. Lackowska, M. (2009), Zarządzanie obszarami metropolitalnymi w Polsce (Management of metropolitan areas in Poland), Wyd. UW, Warszawa.
8. Lefevre, C. (1998), Metropolitan government and governance in western countries: A critical review, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22 (1), 9–25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00120 -
9. Lisowski A. (2005), Urban sprawl process, in: Gutry-Korycka M. (ed.) Urban sprawl – Warsaw Agglomeration Case Study, Wyd. UW, Warszawa.
10. Nunes, S.C. and Barlow, M. (2002), Developments in the government of seven European metropolitan areas, GeoJournal, 58 (special issue), 1–72.
11. Statut Stowarzyszenia Metropolia Warszawa 2006, (and changed in 2009), Warszawa.
12. Strzelecki, Z. (2009), Mazowiecki wymiar polityki rozwoju, in: Rzeźnik G. (ed.) Polityka regionalna na Mazowszu, Polski Instytut Demokracji Lokalnej, FRDL, Warszawa, 15–35.
Rozmiar pliku 0,9 MB ; application/pdf
oai:rcin.org.pl:55818 ; 1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2008.19.3
CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link
Prawa zastrzeżone - dostęp nieograniczony
Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R
Mar 25, 2021
Aug 14, 2015
1161
https://rcin.org.pl/igipz/publication/75503
Czyż, Teresa
Masik, Grzegorz
Somlyódyné Pfeil, Edit
Marszał, Tadeusz
Czyż, Teresa
Wójcik, Marcin