Questions of inequality and collective experience. Hinduism from several inner perspectives

Demski, Dagnosław

doi:0066-5924

Skip to main menu
Skip to search engine
Skip to content
Skip to footer

Planned object

Title: Questions of inequality and collective experience. Hinduism from several inner perspectives

Abstract:

This paper examines the nature of social inequality taking examples from traditional Hinduism still functioning in rural Western India. Comparative research enables us to show the distinct inner divisions of society and different ways of expressing these divisions. Focus on three traditional groups from India — Rajputs, camel shepherds (Rabaris) and Untouchable Dalits (Meghwals), each holding a specific position in society, sheds more light not only on the idosyncracies of their culture, but also on how a specific notion categorizing Hindu values, first creates firm boundaries in society, and then imprints itself on all subgroups, and finally expresses them culturally in myths, symbols, rituals, etc. Doing analysis of these cultures, we discover not only what makes all of them Hindu, but also what makes them distinct. We can also observe the different ways in which each subgroup reacts to social divisions, taking them for granted, crossing them, or being forbidden any transgression. This paper emphasizes the advantage of doing ethnological fieldwork; work on several levels, including interviews and personal contact with a living culture, offers extensive data from various sources, enabling a cultural analysis on a deeper level

References:

Aleaz, K.P. 2004. Some features of a Dalit theology. Asia Journal of Theology 18 (1): 146—67
Briggs, G.W. 1920. The Chamars. Calcutta
Census of India. 1991. Internet: http://www.censusindia.net/scst.html
Deliege, R. 1993. The myths of origin of the Indian Untouchables. Man (N.S.) 28 (3): 533-49
Demski, D. 2007. Obrazy hinduizmu. Kultura i religia oczami radżputów i pasterzy. Warszawa (forth-coming)
Flueckiger, J.B. 1989. Cast e and regional variants in an oral epic tradition. In Oral epics in India, S.H. Blackburn, P.J. Claus, J.B. Flueckiger and S.S. Wadley (eds), 33-54. Berkeley-Los Angeles -London
Ghose, S. 2003. The Dalit in India, Social Research, 70 (1): 83-109
Khan, D.-S. 1997. Conversions and shifting identities: Ramdev Pir and the Ismailis in Rajasthan. Delhi
Khan, D.-S. 1999. Sacrifice, martyrdom and Samadhi in the religious traditions of the Meghwals of Rajasthan. In Religion, ritual and royalty, N.K. Singh and R. Joshi (eds), 140-52. Jaipur-New Delhi
Mahalingam, R. 2003. Essentialism, culture e and power: representations of social class. Journal of Social Issues 59 (4): 733-49
Manusmfti. Kamäsütra. Manu Swajambhuwa— Manusmryti, czyli traktat o zacności. Watsjajana Malla-naga. Kamasutra, czyli traktat o miłowaniu, 1985, trans. K.M. Byrski. Warszawa
Mencher, P. 1974. The caste system upside-down or the not-so Mysterious East. Current Anthropology 15 (4): 469-94
Mookherjee, M. 2003. Exclusion, internalization, harm. Towards a case-based alternative to Walzer's thin minimalism. Ethnicities 3 (3): 345-68
People of Gujarat..., 2003. People of India, vol. 22, Gujarat, part 1-3, K.S. Singh, (ed.), R.B. Lal, P.B.S.V. Padmanabham, G. Krishnan and A. Mohidden (eds of the vol.). Mumbai
Rapport N., 2002. The narrative as fieldwork technique: practical ethnography for a world in motion. In Ethnographic fieldwork in the contemporary world, V. Amit (ed.), 71-95. London-New York
Tilly, Ch. 2001a. Introduction. Anthropology confronts inequality. Anthropological Theory 1 (3): 299-306
Tilly, Ch. 2001b. Relational origins of inequality. Anthropological Theory 1 (3): 355-71