The importance and meaning of category of experience in archaeology ; Przegląd Archeologiczny T. 48 (2000)
Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
The main objective of this article is to discuss usefulness of category of experience in archaeology. It presents two general approaches to experience in philosophy (Hume and Kant) and their development and inspiration in contemporary philosophy of science. These two traditions constitute a framework within which the importance and meaning of experience in archaeology has been discussed. More particularly, the article pinpoints differences between positivist and modernist definition of experience. A special attention is focused upon modernist understanding of experience and its importance. Furthermore, it discusses contemporary tendencies that view experience through its links to emotion and not exclusively to reason. Usefulness of experience is proven to be fundamental in positivist and modernist archaeology, while its value is of limited importance in archaeological works inspired by postmodernist ideas
oai:rcin.org.pl:60007 ; 0079-7138
IAiE PAN, sygn. P III 149 ; IAiE PAN, sygn. P III 272 ; IAiE PAN, sygn. P III 353 ; click here to follow the link
Prawa zastrzeżone - dostęp nieograniczony
Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Biblioteka Instytutu Archeologii i Etnologii PAN
Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego ; Działalność upowszechniająca naukę (DUN)
Feb 2, 2022
Nov 2, 2016
699
https://rcin.org.pl/publication/79655
Edition name | Date |
---|---|
Minta-Tworzowska, Danuta, 2000, Rola i znaczenie pojęcia doświadczenia w archeologii | Feb 2, 2022 |
Minta-Tworzowska, Danuta
Minta-Tworzowska, Danuta
Minta-Tworzowska, Danuta
Minta-Tworzowska, Danuta