Object

Title: Oblicza współczesnej archeologii w ujęciu porównawczym. Na marginesie pracy Comparative archaeologies: a sociological view of the science of the past, Ludomir R. Lozny red., New York 2011

Subtitle:

Archeologia Polski T. 57 Z. 1-2 (2012)

Publisher:

Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

25 cm

References:

Abramowicz A. 1991. Historia archeologii polskiej XIX i XX wiek, Warszawa–Łódź ; Anderson B. 1991. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, wyd. 2, Londyn ; Atkinson J. A., Banks I., O’Sullivan J. red. 1996. Nationalism and archaeology, Glasgow ; Barford P. M. 1995. Marksizm w archeologii polskiej w latach 1945–1975, „Archeologia Polski”, t. 40, z. 1–2, s. 7–78 ; Bate L. F. 1998. El proceso de investigación en Arqueología, Barcelona ; Bernal M. 1985. Black Athena: Afro-Asiatic roots of classical civilization, t. I–III, New Brunswick, N. J ; Binford S. R., Binford L. R. red. 1968. New perspectives in archaeology, Chicago ; Blij H. de, 2008. The power of place: geography, destiny, and globalization’s rough landscape, Oxford ; Bursche A., Taylor T. 1991. A panorama of Polish archaeology, „Antiquity”, t. 65, s. 583–592 ; Byrne D. 1991. Western hegemony in archaeological heritage management, „History and Anthropology”, t. 5, s. 269–276 ; Chapman J. 1980. Evolution récente de l’archéologie théorique en Grande-Bretagne, „Nouvelles de l’Archéologie”, nr 3, s. 16–28 ; Clarke D. L. 1968. Analytical archaeology, London ; Davis D. D. 1996. Revolutionary archaeology in Cuba, „Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory”, t. 3(2), s. 159–188 ; Díaz-Andreu M., Champion T. red. 1996. Nationalism and archaeology in Europe, London ; Dolukhanov P. M. 2005. Archaeology in Russia and its impact on archaeological theory, [w:] P.J. Ucko red., s. 321–333 ; English Heritage. 2000. Power of place: the future of the historic environment, Londyn ; Flannery K. 1994. Childe the evolutionist, [w:] The archaeology of Gordon Childe, D.R. Harris red., Chicago, s. 101–119 ; Galaty M., Watkinson C. red. 2004. Archaeology under dictatorship, New York ; Gathercole P., Lowenthal D. red. 1989. The politics of the past, London ; Gieysztor A. 1950. Polskie badania wczesnodziejowe w r. 1950, „Przegląd Zachodni”, t. 13, s. 193–197 ; Hall M. J. 2005. Great Zimbabwe and the lost city: the cultural colonization of the South African past, [w:] P. J. Ucko red., s. 28–45 ; Harris M. 1984. Materialismo culturale. La lotta per una scienza della cultura, Milano ; Hayden D. 1997. The power of place: urban landscapes as public history, Cambridge ; Hensel W. 1951. Próba periodyzacji najdawniejszych dziejów ziem polskich, „Sprawozdania P.M.A.”,t. 4, s. 17–31 ; Hołubowicz W. 1951. Zagadnienie periodyzacji dziejów społeczeństwa przedklasowego na terenie Polski, „Sprawozdania P.M. A.”, t. 4, s. 1–16 ; Johnson M. 2000. Archaeological theory. An introduction, Oxford ; Kepecs S. 2010. Introduction, new currents in Cuban archaeology, [w:] Beyond the blockade: newcurrents in Cuban archaeology (Caribbean archaeology and ethnohistory), S. Kepecs,L.A. Curet, G. La Rosa Corzo red., s. 1–12 ; Klejn L. S. 1977. A panorama of theoretical archaeology, „Current Anthropology”, t. 18 (1), s. 1–42 ; Klejn L. S. 2011. Istoriâ archeologičeskoj mysli, t. I–II, S. Peterburg ; Kohl P. L., Fawcett C. red. 1995. Nationalism, politics and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge ; Kołakowski L. 1988. Główne nurty marksizmu: powstanie, rozwój, rozkład, Londyn ; Kołakowski L. 2005. Main currents of Marxism: the founders, the golden age, the breakdown, New York ; Kozłowski J. K. 1975. Las industrias de la piedra tallada de Cuba en el contexto del Caribe, Serie Arquelógica, nr 5, Havana ; Lozny L. R. red. 2011. Comparative archaeologies: a sociological view of the science of the past, New York ; Masson V. 1976. Economy and social structure of ancient societies, Leningrad ; McGuire R. H. 1992. A Marxist archaeology, San Diego–New York–Boston–London–Tokyo–Toronto ; Meskell L. red. 1998. Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterraneanand Middle East, London ; Morgan L. H. 1877. Ancient society or researches in the times of human progress from savagery, throughbarbarism to civilization, New York ; Oyuela-Caycedo A., Anaya A., Elera C. G., Valdez L. M. 1997. Social archaeology in Latin America? Comments to T.C. Patterson, „American Antiquity”, t. 62 (ii), s. 365–374 ; Patterson T. C. 1984. Social archaeology in Latin America: an appreciation, „American Antiquity”, t. 59 (iii), s. 531–537 ; Politis G. G. 2003. The theoretical landscape and the methodological development of archaeology in LatinAmerica, „American Antiquity”, t. 68 (ii), s. 245–272 ; Renfrew C. 1980. The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: archaeology as anthropology?, „AmericanJournal of Archaeology”, t. 84, s. 287–294 ; Renfrew C., Bahn P. 1996. Archaeology: theories, methods and practice, London ; Seligman C.G. 1930. The races of Africa, London ; Szacki J. 2002. Historia myśli socjologicznej. Wydanie nowe, Warszawa ; Sztompka P. 2005. Socjologia zmian społecznych, Kraków ; Tabaczyński S. 1995. A future for the Marxist paradigm in central European archaeology? The Polishcase, [w:] Whither archaeology? Papers in honour of Evžen Neustupný, M. Kuna,N. Venclová red., Praha, s. 69–81 ; Tabaczyński S. w druku, Socjologia pradziejów. Zarys problematyki, [w:] Przeszłość społeczna. Próba konceptualizacji ; Tabío E., Rey E. 1966. Prehistoria de Cuba, Havana ; Taylor W. 1948. A study of archaeology, Menasha ; Trigger B. G. 1976. The children of Aataentsic: a history of the Huron people to 1660, Montreal ; Trigger B. G. 1980. Archaeology and the image of the American Indian, American Antiquity”, t. 45 (iv), s. 662–676 ; Trigger B. G. 1984. Alternative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, „Man”, t. 19, s. 355–370 ; Trigger B. G. 2008. „Alternative archaeologies” in historical perspective. Evaluating multiple narrativesbeyond nationalist colonialist imperialist archaeologies, [w:] Evaluating multiple narratives:beyond nationalist, colonialist, imperialist archaeologies, J. Habu, C. Fawcett,J.M. Matsunaga red., New York, s. 187–195 ; Ucko P. J. red. 2005. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective, London–New York ; Vargas Arenas I. 1995. The perception of history and archaeology in Latin America: a theoretical approach,[w:] Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-western settings, P.R. Schmidt, T.C. Patterson red., Santa Fe, s. 47–68 ; Waterbolk H. T. 1981. Archaeology in the Netherlands, Delta archaeology, [w:] Regional traditions of archaeologicalresearch I., B.G. Trigger, I. Glover red., „World Archaeology”, t. 13 (ii), s. 240–254 ; Willey G. R., Phillips P. 1958. Method and theory in American archeology, Chicago

Relation:

Archeologia Polski

Volume:

57

Issue:

1-2

Start page:

261

End page:

293

Format:

application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:49570 ; oai:rcin.org.pl:49570 ; 0003-8180

Source:

IAiE PAN, call no. P 320 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 321 ; IAiE PAN, call no. P 319 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

pol

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Library of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Projects co-financed by:

Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information