Object

Title: Regeneration and demolition vis-á-vis disintegration of urban space: The case of el Cabanyal-Canyamelar in Valencia

Subtitle:

Geographia Polonica Vol. 92 No. 1 (2019)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

24 cm

Abstract:

Disintegration of urban space is the opposite of its organisation; regeneration should be discussed in this context as it restores or introduces morphological attributes that meet the needs of local communities. The paper identifies the impact of regeneration upon urban space (re)integration and the role of planned demolition as a regeneration tool on the example of el Cabanyal-Canyamelar district in Valencia, Spain. Studies have demonstrated that demolition can be considered a rational component of regeneration and that not only morphological attributes of the transformed area are important for urban space regeneration but also intentions and ways of using demolition as a regeneration tool.

References:

1. Allagra M., Casaglia A., Rokem J., 2012. The political geographies of urban polarization: A critical review of research on divided cities. Geography Compass, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 560-574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00506.x ; 2. Andranovich G., Burbank M.J., Heying C.H., 2001. Olympic cities: Lessons learned from mega-event politics. Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2166.00079 ; 3. Aquilué I., Roca E., 2016. Urban development after the Bosnian War: The division of Sarajevo's territory and the construction of East Sarajevo. Cities, vol. 58, pp. 152-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.008 ; 4. Augé M., 1995. Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso. ; 5. BELTRAN F., 2010. El Cabanyal: Valencia's last window to the Mediterranean. Babelmed, http:// eng.babelmed.net/article/7011-el-cabanyalvalencias-last-window-to-the-mediterranean/ [15 December 2019]. ; 6. Blandy S., Lister D., 2005. Gated communities: (Ne)Gating community development? Housing Studies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/026730303042000331781 ; 7. Boira Maiques J.V., 2003. Science, politics and image in Valencia: A review of urban discourse in the Spanish City. Cities, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2003.08.007 ; 8. Bourne L.S., 1993. The myth and reality of gentrification: A commentary on emerging urban forms. Urban Studies, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 312-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320080111 ; 9. Brabec T., Machala B., 2015. The role of developers in the formation of gated communities in Prague. AUC Geographica, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 115-123. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2015.91 ; 10. Burriel E.L., 2011. Subversion of land-use plans and the housing bubble in Spain. Urban Research & Practice, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 232-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2011.616743 ; 11. Calme J., Charlesworth E., 2012. Divided Cities: Belfast, Beirut, Jerusalem, Mostar, and Nicosia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. ; 12. Campos B.S., 2008. Movimientos sociales: una revisión teórica y nuevas aproximaciones. Boletín de Antropología Universidad de Antioquía, vol. 22, no. 39, pp.112-131. ; 13. Carvalho M., George R., Anthony K., 1997. Residential satisfaction in Condominos Exclusivos in Brazil. Environment and Behaviour, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 734-768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916597296002 ; 14. Casagrande M., Harrison A.L., 2013. Architectural theories of the environment: Posthuman territory. New York: Routledge. ; 15. CLARKE E., 2005. The order and simplicity of gentrification – a political challenge [in:] R. Atkinson, G. Bridge (eds.), Gentrification in a global context: The new urban colonialism, London: Routledge, London, pp. 256-264. ; 16. COUDROY DE LILLE L., 2003. Lyon Confluence – metropolitalny projekt w widłach Rodanu i Saony w Lyonie [in:] I. Jażdżewska (ed.), Funkcje metropolitalne i ich rola w organizacji przestrzeni, XVI Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, pp. 267-275. ; 17. Davidson M., Lees L., 2005. New-built 'gentrification' and London's riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1165-1190. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3739 ; 18. DE SOLÀ-MORALES I RUBIÓ M., 1999. Progettare citta / Designing cities. Milano: Electa. ; 19. Del Romeo Renau L., Lozano A.V., 2015. From NIMBYsm to the 15M: A decade of urban conflicts in Barcelona and Valencia. Territory, Politics, Governance, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 375-395. ; 20. DEL ROMEO RENAU L., TRUDELLE C., 2011. Mega events and urban conflicts in Valencia, Spain: Contesting the new urban modernity. Urban Studies Research, vol. 2011, article ID 587523, 12 pages,. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/587523 ; 21. Díaz J.M.C., Araujo J.M., 2017. Historic urbanization process in Spain (1746-2013): From the fall of the American empire to the real estate bubble. Journal of Urban History, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144215583481 ; 22. Dumper M., 2013. Policing divided cities: Stabilization and law enforcement in Palestinian East Jerusalem. International Affairs, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1247-1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12070 ; 23. E.D.U.S.I., 2015. Estrategia de desarrollo urbano sostenible e integrado del barrio. El CabanyalCanyamelar-Cap de Franca. Valencia: Diciembre 2015, http://www.valencia.es/edusi3c/sites/default/files/docs/e.d.u.s.i._cabanyalcanyamelar-cap_franca_compressed.pdf [20 December 2018]. ; 24. ESTABAN M., ALTUZARRA A., 2016. Local political power and housing bubble in Spain. Investigaciones Regionales: Journal of Regional Research, no. 35, pp. 107-127. ; 25. GAJA I DÍAZ F., 2002. La ciutat de València en el segle XX. La consolidació de la ciutat "moderna" [in:] F. Gaja i Díaz (ed.), Pensar València. Taller XXI d'Urbanisme, Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València, pp. 1-26. ; 26. Gehl J., 2011. Life between buildings: Using public space. Washington D.C.: Island Press. ; 27. Gibson CH., 2003. Cultures at work: Why 'culture' matters in research on the 'cultural' industries. Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360309059 ; 28. GLASS R., 1964. London: Aspects of change. London: Mac Gibbon and Kee, Centre of Urban Studies Report 3. ; 29. Gould P., White R., 1974. Mental maps. London-New York: Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203163757 ; 30. Halbwachs M., 1992. On collective memory. Heritage of Sociology Series, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ; 31. Harvey D., 2008. The right to the city. New Left Review, vol. 53, pp: 23-40. ; 32. Harvey D., 2012. Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso. ; 33. HERRERO GARCÍA L.F., SOLDEVILLA LIAÑO M., 2010. La plataforma Salvem El Cabanyal: doce a-os de lucha ciudadana. E-rph: Revista electrónica de Patrimonio Histórico, no. 6, pp. 100-116. ; 34. Jałowiecki B., Szczepański M.S., 2010. Miasto i przestrzeń w perspektywie socjologicznej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. ; 35. Jones P., Evans J., 2009. Urban regeneration in the UK. London: Sage. ; 36. Kaczmarek S., 2001. Rewitalizacja terenów poprzemysłowych: Nowy wymiar w rozwoju miast. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. ; 37. KACZMAREK S., 2003. Post-industrial areas in modern cities. Bulletin of Geography (Socio-Economic Series), no. 2, pp. 39-46. ; 38. Kaczmarek S., 2010. Proces rewitalizacji terenów poprzemysłowych a organizacja przestrzenie miejskiej Łodzi [in:] T. Markowski, S. Kaczmarek, J. Olenderek (eds.), Rewitalizacja terenów poprzemysłowych Łodzi, Warszawa: Biuletyn KPZK PAN, vol. 132, pp. 7-18. ; 39. Kaczmarek S., 2012. Kultura gospodarowania przestrzenią w mieście. Studia Miejskie, vol. 5, pp. 9-17. ; 40. Kaczmarek S., Kazimierczak J., Coudroy De Lille L., Mongeard L., 2018. Demolowanie terenów miejskich: synergia w badaniach geograficznych w Polsce i we Francji [in:] M. Więckowski, M. Jędrusik, L. Coudroy de Lille, A. Le Blanc (eds.), Geografia. Wspólne idee, wspólne wizje. Sto lat współpracy polsko-francuskiej, Warszawa: Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 97-114. ; 41. Kazimierczak J., 2010. Memorial plaques and monuments in Łódź-Śródmieście 'the City Centre District' commemorating people and events from the history of the city. Turyzm, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 13-19. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10106-010-0002-0 ; 42. Kazimierczak J., 2014. Wpływ rewitalizacji terenów poprzemysłowych na organizację przestrzeni centralnej w Manchesterze, Lyonie i Łodzi. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. ; 43. Kazimierczak J., 2016. Metoda identyfikacji intensywności i typów rewitalizacji terenów poprzemysłowych w procesie kształtowania przestrzeni centralnej miasta na przykładzie wybranych miast europejskich [in:] J. Skowronek (ed.), Innowacyjne rozwiązania rewitalizacji terenów zdegradowanych, vol. 8, Katowice, pp. 111-122. ; 44. Kazimierczak J., 2017. "Zielona rewolucja": Demolowanie i rewitalizacja w kształtowaniu przestrzeni publicznej miast. Studia Miejskie, vol. 28, pp. 21-43. https://doi.org/10.25167/sm2017.028.02 ; 45. Kazimierczak J., Kosmowski P., 2017. In the shadow of urban regeneration megaproject: Urban transitions of downtown in Łódź, Poland. Urban Development Issue, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 39-50. ; 46. Klaassen L.H., 1988. Economical Thought and Practice. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. ; 47. KOTARBIŃSKI T., 1965. Traktat o dobrej robocie. Warszawa: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich. ; 48. Lees L., 2003. Progress in gentrification research? Afterword. Environment and Planning A, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 228-234. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39329 ; 49. Lefebvre H., 1996. Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher. ; 50. Lerner J., 2014. Urban acupuncture. Washington: Island Press. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-584-7 ; 51. Lévy J., Lussault M. (eds.), 2014. Dictionnaire de la géographie. Paris: Belin. ; 52. Liszewski S., 2012. Geografia urbanistyczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. ; 53. Lorens P., 2004. Tożsamość a autentyzm przestrzeni publicznej współczesnych wielkoskalowych założeń urbanistycznych [in:] T. Markowski (ed.), Wielkoskalowe projekty inwestycyjne jako czynnik podnoszenia konkurencyjności polskiej przestrzeni, Warszawa: Biuletyn KPZK, vol. 210, pp. 10-78. ; 54. LÓPEZ NICOLÁS M., BODÍ RAMIRO J., 2009. Reordenación urbana, ¿Derechos vulnerados?: El caso del menor en El Cabanyal. Documentos de Trabajo Social, no. 46, pp. 37-55. ; 55. Lynch K., 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ; 56. Maik W., Rembowska K., Suliborski A., 2005. Geografia jako nauka o przestrzeni, środowisku i krajobrazie. Łódź: Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe. ; 57. Majer A., 2016. Miasto w osobistym wymiarze. Studia Miejskie, vol. 21, pp. 9-28. ; 58. Marcuse P., 2009. From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, vol. 13, no. 2-3, pp. 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177 ; 59. Miller H.H., 2000. Mega-events, urban boosterism and growth strategies: An analysis of the objectives and legitimations of the Cape Town 2004 Olympic bid. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 439-458. ; 60. MIRALLES I GARCIA J.L., 2013. Contributions to a theoretical framework for sustainable urban development: Some conclusions of the Spanish case [in:] S.S. Zubir, C.A. Brebbia (eds.), The Sustainable City VIII (2 Volume Set): Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, WIT Press, pp. 199- 210. ; 61. Mitchell D., 2003. The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guilford Pres. ; 62. Muñoz Cosme G., 2012. El Cabanyal. Patrimonio En Riesgo. Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. ; 63. Muszyńska A., 2013. Wielokulturowość w przestrzeni Suboticy [in:] R. Sendek, B. Rusin (eds.), Wśród czy obok nas? Mniejszości w literaturze, kulturze i historii krajów słowiańskich, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Scriptum, pp. 55-66. ; 64. Navarro Elsava L., 2014. Salvem el Cabanyal: Urban movements and their claim for the "Right to the City" in Valencia. VLC arquitectura. Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 47-61. ; 65. NAVARRO ELSAVA L., 2016. Urban regeneration and the transformative potential of dissensus: The case of 'el Cabanyal' in Valencia. Conference paper at International Conference: From Contested Cities to Global Urban Justice. Stream 1: Article no. 1-014, Critical Dialogues in Madrid 4 July 2016-7 July 2016. ; 66. Paasi A., 2004. Place and region: Looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 536-546. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph502pr ; 67. Prytherch D.L., Boira Maiques J.V., 2009. City profile: Valencia. Cities, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2008.11.004 ; 68. Purcell M., 2001. Neighbourhood activism among homeowners as a politics of space. Professional Geographer, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 178-194. ttps://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00278 ; 69. Purcell M., 2002. Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, vol. 58, no. 2-3, pp. 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f ; 70. Raco M., 2014. Delivering flagship projects in an era of regulatory capitalism: State-led privatization and the London Olympics 2012. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 176-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12025 ; 71. Relph E., 1976. Place and placelessness. Research in planning and design, no. 1, London: Pion. ; 72. Roche M., 1992. Mega-events and micro-modernization: On the sociology of the new urban tourism. British Journal of Sociology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 2-11. https://doi.org/10.2307/591340 ; 73. Roche M., 2000. Mega-events and modernity: Olympics and Expos in the growth of global culture. London: Routlege. ; 74. Slae B., Kark R., Shoval N., 2012. Post-war reconstruction and conservation of the historic Jewish Quarter in Jerusalem, 1967-1975. Planning Perspectives, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 369-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2012.681138 ; 75. Swyngedouw E., Moulaert F., Rodriguez A., 2002. Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 547-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00254 ; 76. Szmytkowska M., 2016. Realizacje urbanistyczne w mieście postindustrialnym i ich wpływ na kształtowanie ładu przestrzennego. Studia Miejskie, vol. 22, pp. 9-22. ; 77. Tobiasz-Lis P., Wójcik M., 2013. Evaluating and interpreting the city using a photo projective method: The example of Łódź. Geographia Polonica, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 137-152. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2013.14 ; 78. Tobiasz-Lis P., Wójcik M., 2013. Interpreting contrasts of the post-industrial city: The example of Lodz. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Special Issue, vol. 3, no. 14, pp. 22-31. ; 79. Tuan Y.-F., 2001. Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. ; 80. Vanwynsberghe R., Surborg B., Wyly E., 2013. When the games come to town: Neoliberalism, mega events and social inclusion in the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic Games. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 2074-2093. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01105.x ; 81. Wallis A., 1990. Socjologia przestrzeni. Warszawa: Niezależna Oficyna Wydawnicza. ; 82. YIN R.K., 2014. Case study research: Design and methods. London-New Dehli: Sage.

Relation:

Geographia Polonica

Volume:

92

Issue:

1

Start page:

121

End page:

139

Format:

File size 1,5 MB

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:69813 ; oai:rcin.org.pl:69813 ; 0016-7282 (print) ; 2300-7362 (online) ; 10.7163/GPol.0140

Source:

CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.2085, Cz.2173, Cz.2406 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Language of abstract:

eng

Rights:

Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. [CC BY 4.0] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, full text available at: ; -

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

; Operational Program Digital Poland, 2014-2020, Measure 2.3: Digital accessibility and usefulness of public sector information; funds from the European Regional Development Fund and national co-financing from the state budget.

Objects

Similar
×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information