Peripheral (Non)Polishnesses : Museums, Creeping Conflicts, and Transformative Frictions

Kobielska, Maria; Siewior, Kinga

doi:2450-8462

Pobierz

Tytuł: Peripheral (Non)Polishnesses : Museums, Creeping Conflicts, and Transformative Frictions

Abstrakt:

Whilst Poland appears today as a paradigmatic example of a homogeneous, exclusive national and cultural identity, reinforced by the hegemonic historical policy of a semi-authoritarian state, it is also challenged by Polish minority histories (civilian, multi-ethnic, non-Catholic, women). The main concern of the present article is the plural ‘Polishness’ that emerges from the constellation of these non-default histories. To examine the frictions of historical narratives in action, authors use spaces of historical museums as a field of observation, perceiving them as memory agents fostering not only confrontational but also negotiative memory politics. To identify situations in which tensions between the ‘central’ Polishness and its unorthodox variants are particularly evident, the paper takes a look at ‘non-central’ Polish territories i.e. ‘post-German’ areas, characterized by a complex heterogeneous past in which Germanness and Polishness, but also ‘Silesianness’ or ‘Borderlandness’ mutually clash and dialogue. Analysis of selected exhibitions’ construction reveals peculiarities of different local contexts in transitional spaces and strategies of resolving creeping conflicts between ‘the Polishness’ and plural, peripheral ‘Polishnesses’. As authors argue, these case studies – instead of a static model of open memory conflict and binaries – offer dynamic models of memory, and allow to introduce the concept of memory frictions.

Bibliografia:

Balibar Etienne, ‘The Nation Form: History and Ideology’, in Etienne Balibar and Immanuel Wallerstein, Race, Nation, Class. Ambiguous Identities (London, 2002).
Bourdieu Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, transl. Richard Nice (London, 2010).
Janicka Elżbieta, ‘The Embassy of Poland in Poland. The Polin Myth in the Museum of the History of Polish Jews (MHPJ) as a Narrative Pattern and Model of Minority-Majority Relations’, transl. Katrin Stoll and Jakub Ozimek, Studia Litteraria et Historica, 5 (2016),
Kobielska Maria, ‘The Touchstone of Polishness? Suffering Exhibited in “New Museums” in Poland’, Polish Review, lxiv, 2 (2019).
Kobielska Maria, Polska kultura pamięci: dominanty. Zbrodnia katyńska, powstanie warszawskie i stan wojenny (Warszawa, 2016).
Lehrer Erica and Monika Murzyn-Kupisz, ‘Making Space for Jewish Culture in Polish Folk and Ethnographic Museums: Curating Social Diversity after Ethnic Cleansing’, Museum Worlds, 7 (2019).
Lehrer Erica, ‘Material Kin: “Communities of Implication” in Post-Colonial, Post-Holocaust Polish Ethnographic Collections’, in Margareta von Oswald and Jonas Tinius (eds), Across Anthropology: Troubling Colonial Legacies, Museums, and the Curatorial (Leuven, 2020).
Lowenhaupt Tsing Anna, Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton– Oxford, 2005).
Mälksoo Maria, ‘“Memory Must Be Defended”: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security’, Security Dialogue, xlvi, 3 (2015).
Maniak Katarzyna and Anna Kurpiel, ‘Przysposobienie i absorpcja. Strategie wobec niemieckiego dziedzictwa w szczecińskich i wrocławskich muzeach’, Zbiór Wiadomości do Antropologii Muzealnej, 8 (2021).
Romik Natalia, ‘Nothing Is Going to Change? Adaptation of the Jewish Pre-Burial House in Gliwice’, East European Jewish Affairs xlv, 2–3 (2015).
Rothberg Michael, The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators (Stanford, 2019).
Siewior Kinga, Wielkie poruszenie. Pojałtańskie narracje migracyjne w kulturze polskiej (Warszawa, 2018).
Szmeja Maria, ‘Silesian identity: Social and Political Problems’, Journal of Borderlands Studies, xxii, 1 (2007).
Ziębińska-Witek Anna, Muzealizacja komunizmu w Polsce i Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej (Lublin, 2018).
Tomann Juliane, ‘“The Light of History”: The First Permanent Exhibition on Upper Silesian History in Poland Avoids Sensitive Issues and Focuses on Ostensible Consensus’, Cultures of History Forum (01.03.2016)