The article applies a comparative perspective to assess the onset of the two ‘successful’ eighteen-century revolutions – the American and the French. The Boston events of March 1770 are compared with those of Paris in July 1789: in both cases ‘the people’ faced the soldiers, riots and politically generated violence led to bloodshed, but the subsequent actions of the insurgents showed a marked difference in understanding the sense of justice and the ways of promoting revolutionary discourse. Boston patriots relied on the English-based system of common law, were ready to condemn their own radicals and did not wish plebeian justice to prevail. They hoped for a perestroika, not for a revolution. The French – finding no culprits to condemn, and having as of yet no legal institutions of their own to use – were willing to disregard the legal continuity of the state and to search for more radical solutions.
Alder, Ken, ‘Stepson of the Enlightenment: the Duc du Châtelet, the Colonel who “Caused” the French Revolution’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 12, 1998, 1, pp. 1–18.
Andrews, Richard M., Law, Magistracy, and Crime in Old Regime Paris, 1735–1789, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, vol. 1: The System of Criminal Justice.
Applewhite, Harriet B., ‘Political Legitimacy in Revolutionary France, 1788– 1791’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 9, 1978, 2, pp. 245–73.
Archer, Richard, As If an Enemy’s Country: The British Occupation of Boston and the Origins of Revolution, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Bailyn, Bernard, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1967.
Birn, Raymond, ‘Reinventing le Peuple of 1789’, History Teacher 23, 1990, 4, pp. 363–73.
Blair St. George, Robert, Massacred Language: Courtroom Performance in Eighteenth-Century Boston, in Possible Pasts: Becoming Colonial in Early America, ed. Robert Blair St. George, Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univeristy Press, 2000, pp. 327–56.
Bryant, Lawrence M., ‘Royal Ceremony and the Revolutionary Strategies of the Third Estate’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 22, 1989, 3, pp. 413–50.
Bukovansky, Mlada, Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Caron, Pierre, ‘La tentative de contre-révolution de juin–juillet 1789’, Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 8, 1906–1907, 1 and 9, pp. 3–34, 649–78.
Chagniot, Jean, ‘Le Guet et la Garde de Paris à la fin de l’Ancien Régime’, Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 20,1973, 1, pp. 58–71.
Christofferson, Michael S., ‘An Antitotalitarian History of the French Revolution: François Furet’s “Penser la Révolution française” in the Intellectual Politics of the Late 1970’s’, French Historical Studies, 22, 1999, 4, pp. 557–611.
Cogliano, Francis D., ‘Deliverance from Luxury: Pope’ Day, Conflict and Consensus in Colonial Boston, 1745–1765’, Studies in Popular Culture, 15, 1993, 2, pp. 15–28.
Fitzsimmons, Michael P., The Night the Old Regime Ended: August 4, 1789 and the French Revolution, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003.
Garrioch, David, Neighbourhood and Community in Paris, 1740–1790, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Hesse, Carla, ‘La preuve par lettre. Pratiques juridiques au tribunal révolutionnaire de Paris (1793–1794)’, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 51, 1996, 3, pp. 629–42.
Howell, Peter, ‘Burke, Paine and the Newspapers: An Archaeology of Political Knowledge, 1789–93’, Studies in Romanticism, 43, 2003, 4, pp. 357–98.
Lemisch, Jesse, ‘Jack Tar in the Streets: Merchant Seamen in the Politics of Revolutionary America’, William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, 25, 1968, 3, pp. 371–407.
Levi, Giovanni, ‘On Microhistory’, in New Perspectives on Historical Writing, ed. Peter Burke, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991, pp. 93–113.
Luckett, Thomas A., ‘Hunting for Spies and Whores: A Parisian Riot on the Eve of the French Revolution’, Past & Present, 156, 1997, pp. 116–43.
Ludwikowski, Rett R., ‘The French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the American Constitutional Development’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 38, 1990, pp. 445–62.
Lüsebrink, Hans-Jürgen, and Rolf Reichardt, ‘La “Bastille” dans l’imaginaire social de la France à la fin du XVIIIe siècle (1774–1799)’, Revue d’histore moderne et contemporaine, 30, 1983, 2, pp. 196–234.
Mason, Laura, ‘The “Bosom of Proof”: Criminal Justice and the Renewal of Oral Culture during the French Revolution”, Journal of Modern History, 76, 2004, 1, pp. 29–61.
McNamara, Martha J., ‘“In the Face of the Court…”: Law, Commerce, and the Transformation of Public Space in Boston, 1650–1770’, Winterthur Portfolio, 36, 2001, 2–3, pp. 125–39.
Maier, Pauline, From Resistance to Revolution: Colonial Radicals and the Development of American Opposition to Britain, 1765–1776, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1972.
Maier, Pauline, ‘Popular Uprising and Civil Authority in Eighteenth-Century America’, William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, 27, 1970, 1, pp. 3–35.
Maza, Sarah, ‘Politics, Culture and the Origins of the French Revolution’, Journal of Modern History, 61, 1989, 4, pp. 704–23.
Ozouf, Mona, La Fête révolutionnaire, 1789–1799, Paris: Gallimard, 1976.
Popkin, Jeremy, ‘Not Over After All: The French Revolution’s Third Century’, Journal of Modern History, 74, 2002, 4, pp. 801–21.
Reid, John Phillip, In a Rebellious Spirit: The Arguments of Fact, the Liberty Riot, and the Coming of the American Revolution, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1979.
Samuelson, Richard A., ‘The Constitutional Sanity of James Otis: Resistance Leader and Loyal Subject’, Review of Politics 61, 1999, 3, pp. 493–523.
Schama, Simon, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1989.
Scott, Samuel F., ‘Problems of Law and Order during 1790, the “peaceful” Year of the French Revolution’, American Historical Review, 80, 1975, 4, pp. 859–80.
Sewell, William H. Jr., ‘Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille’, Theory and Society, 25, 1996, pp. 841–81.
Shapiro, Barry M., ‘Revolutionary Justice in 1789–1790: The Comité des Recherches, the Châtelet, and the Fayettist Coalition’, French Historical Studies, 17, 1992, 3, pp. 656–69.
Sonenscher. Michael, Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem of the French Revolution, Princeton, NJ, 2008.
Spagnoli, Paul G., ‘The Revolution Begins: Lambesc’s Charge, 12 July 1789’, French Historical Studies, 17, 1991, 2, pp. 466–97.
Tackett, Timothy, Becoming a Revolutionary: The Deputies of the French National Assembly and the Emergence of a Revolutionary Culture, 1789–1790, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Tackett, Timothy, When the King took Flight, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Tyler, John W., Smugglers and Patriots: Boston Merchants and the Advent of the American Revolution, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, 1986.
York, Neil L., ‘Rival Truths, Political Accommodation, and the Boston “Massacre”’, Massachusetts Historical Review, 11, 2009, pp. 57–95.
Zobel, Hillier B., The Boston Massacre, New York: W. W. Norton, 1970.
Nov 5, 2018
Dec 19, 2017
|Dobrowolski, Paweł T. (1954- ), Popular justice or why were there no sans-culottes in America?||Nov 5, 2018|
Leśnodorski, Bogusław (1914-1985) Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Karpińska, Małgorzata (1955- ) Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences Polish Historical Society
Skowronek, Jerzy (1937-1996) Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Godechot, Jacques (1907-1989) Senkowska-Gluck, Monika. Tr., Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Senkowska-Gluck, Monika Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Salmonowicz, Stanisław (1931- ) Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Grzeloński, Bogdan (1941- ) Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Senkowska-Gluck, Monika = Hamanowa, Monika (1925- ) Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences