Obiekt

Tytuł: Regional Diversification and Policy Intervention

Twórca:

Boschma, Ron

Data wydania/powstania:

2012

Typ zasobu:

Artykuł

Inny tytuł:

Europa XXI 22 (2012)

Wydawca:

IGiPZ PAN

Miejsce wydania:

Warszawa

Opis:

s. 65-111

Bibliografia:

1. Agrawal A., Cockburn I., McHale J., 2006, Gone but not forgotten: Labor flows, knowledge spilloversand enduring social capital, Journal of Economic Geography 6(5): 571-591.
-
2. Almeida P., Kogut B., 1999, Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regionalnetworks, Management Science 45: 905-917.
-
3. Angel D., 1991, High-technology agglomeration and the labor market: the case of Silicon Valley,Environment and Planning A, 23: 1501-1516.
-
4. Antonelli C., 1995, The economics of localized technological change and industrial dynamics,Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
-
5. Arora A., Gambardella A., 1994, The changing technology of technological change: General andabstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy 23: 523–32.
-
6. Arrow K.J., 1962, The economic implications of learning by doing, Review of Economic Studies 29:155-173.
-
7. Asheim B.T., Boschma R., Cooke P., 2011, Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies basedon related variety and differentiated knowledge bases, Regional Studies 45 (7): 893-904.
-
8. Audretsch D.B., Feldman M., 1996, Spillovers and the geography of innovation and production,American Economic Review 86: 630-40.
9. Balland P.A., 2009, Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks. Evidence from R&Dprojects within the GNSS industry, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 09.14, UtrechtUniversity, Department of Economic Geography.
10. Bathelt H., Boggs J.S., 2003, Towards a Reconceptualization of Regional Development Paths: IsLeipzig’s Media Cluster a Continuation of or a Rupture with the Past? Economic Geography79: 265-293.
-
11. Best M., 2006, Regional specialization and industrial renewal. High-tech in Lowell, Massachusetts,paper presented at the DRUID conference 2006.
12. Bishop P., Gripaios P., 2010, Spatial externalities, relatedness and sector employment growth in GreatBritain, Regional Studies, 44(4): 443-454.
-
13. Boschma R.A., 2005, Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment, Regional Studies 39(1):61-74.
-
14. Boschma R., Eriksson R., Lindgren U., 2009, How does labour mobility affect the performanceof plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity, Journal of EconomicGeography 9 (2): 169-190.
-
15. Boschma R., Frenken K., 2011, Technological relatedness and regional branching, in: H. Bathelt,M.P. Feldman and D.F. Kogler (eds.), Beyond Territory. Dynamic Geographies of KnowledgeCreation, Diffusion and Innovation, Routledge, London and New York, 64-81.
16. Boschma R.A., Iammarino S., 2009, Related variety, trade linkages and regional growth, EconomicGeography 85 (3): 289-311.
-
17. Boschma R.A., Wenting R., 2007, The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry. Industrialand Corporate Change, 16 (2): 213-238.
-
18. Brachart M., Kubis A., Titze M., 2011, Related variety, unrelated variety and regional functions.Identifying sources of regional employment growth in Germany from 2003 to 2008, IHW-DiscussionPapers, no. 15, Halle Institute for Economic Research.
19. Breschi S., Lissoni F., 2003, Mobility and social networks: Localised knowledge spillovers revisited.CESPRI Working Paper 142, Bocconi University, Milan.
20. Broekel T., Boschma R., 2011, Knowledge Networks in the Dutch Aviation Industry - The ProximityParadox. Journal of Economic Geography, forthcoming.
21. Buenstorf G., Fritsch M., Medrano L.F., 2010, Regional knowledge and the emergence of an industry.Laser systems production in West Germany, 1975-2005, Papers in Evolutionary EconomicGeography, 10.16, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
22. Buenstorf G., Geissler M., 2011, The origins of entrants and the geography of the German laserindustry, Papers in Regional Science 90 (2): 251-270.
-
23. Buenstorf G., Guenther C., 2011, No place like home? Relocation, capabilities, and firm survival inthe German machine tool industry after World War II, Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (1):1-28.
-
24. Buenstorf G., Klepper S., 2009, Heritage and agglomeration: the Akron tyre cluster revisited, EconomicJournal, 119: 705-733.
-
25. Buerger M., Cantner U., 2011, The regional dimension of sectoral innovativeness. An empiricalinvestigation of two specialized supplier and two science-based industries, Papers in RegionalScience, 90 (2): 373-393.
-
26. Carlsson B., Stankiewicz R., 1991, On the nature, function and composition of technological systems,Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 93-118.
-
27. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A., 1990, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation,Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-153.
-
28. Cooke P., 2010, Transversality and transition. Branching to new regional path dependence, paperprepared for workshop Trinity College, Oxford, 5-7 september
29. Eriksson R.H., 2011, Localized spillovers and knowledge flows – How does proximity influence theperformance of plants, Economic Geography 87: 127-152.
-
30. Feldman M. P., 1999, The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: Review ofempirical studies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 8:5–25.
-
31. Feldman M.P., Francis J., Bercovitz J., 2005, Creating a cluster while building a firm. Entrepreneursand the formation of industrial clusters, Regional Studies, 39: 129-141.
-
32. Fornahl D., Henn S., Menzel M. (eds.), 2010, Emerging clusters, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33. Frenken K., Van Oort F.G., Verburg T., 2007, Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economicgrowth. Regional Studies, 41 (5): 685-697.
-
34. Frenken K., Cefis E., Stam E., 2011, Industrial dynamics and economic geography: a survey, ECISworking paper 11.07, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.
35. Glaeser E.L., 2005, Reinventing Boston: 1630-2003, Journal of Economic Geography 5: 119-153.
-
36. Harmaakorpi V., Tura T., Melkas H., 2011, Regional Innovation Platforms, in: P. Cooke, R. Boschma,R. Martin and F. Todtling (eds.), Handbook on Regional Innovation and Growth, Cheltenham:Edward Elgar, 556-572.
37. Hassink R., 2005, How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning regionto learning cluster, European Planning Studies, 13 (4): 521-535.
-
38. Hassink R., 2010, Locked in decline? On the role of regional lock-ins in old industrial areas, in: R.Boschma and R. Martin (eds.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Cheltenham:Edward Elgar, 450-467.
39. Hassink R., Lagendijk A., 2001, The dilemmas for interregional institutional learning, Environmentand Planning C. Government and Policy, 19 (1): 65-84.
-
40. Hausmann R., Hidalgo C.A., 2010, Country diversification, product ubiquity, and economic divergence,CID Working Paper No. 201, Center for International Development, Harvard University,Cambridge.
41. Hausmann R., Klinger B., 2007, The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparativeadvantage, CID working paper No. 146, Center for International Development, Harvard University,Cambridge.
42. Hidalgo C.A., 2009, The Dynamics of Economic Complexity and the Product Space over a 42 yearperiod, CID Working Paper No. 189, Center for International Development, Harvard University,Cambridge.
43. Hidalgo C.A., Klinger B., Barabási A.-L., Hausmann R., 2007, The Product Space Conditions theDevelopment of Nations. Science 317: 482-487.
-
44. Howells J., 2005, Innovation and regional economic development. A matter of perspective? ResearchPolicy, vol. 34, pp. 1220-1234.
-
45. Klepper S., 2007, Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of Detroit as the capital of the U.S.automobile industry. Management Science 53: 616-631.
-
46. Klepper S., 2010, The origin and growth of industry clusters: the making of Silicon Valley andDetroit, Journal of Urban Economics 67: 15-32.
-
47. Lagendijk A., Oinas P. (eds.), 2005, Proximity, distance and diversity. Issues on economic interactionand local development, Aldershot: Ashgate.
48. Lambooy J.G., Boschma R.A., 2001, Evolutionary economics and regional policy, Annals of RegionalScience, 35 (1): 113-133.
-
49. Martin R., Sunley P., 2006, Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of EconomicGeography, 6 (4): 395–437.
-
50. Maskell P., Malmberg A., 2007, Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Journal ofEconomic Geography 7(5): 603-618.
-
51. Meyer M., Libaers D., Park J., 2011, The emergence of novel science-related fields: regional or technologicalpatterns? Exploration and exploitation in United Kingdom nanotechnology, RegionalStudies, 45 (7): 935-959.
-
52. Neffke F., 2009, Productive Places. The Influence of Technological Change and Relatedness onAgglomeration Externalities, PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
53. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R., 2011, How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatednessand the development of new growth paths in regions, Economic Geography, 87 (3): 237-265.
-
54. Neffke F, Svensson Henning M., 2008, Revealed relatedness: Mapping industry space. Papersin Evolutionary Economic Geography, no. 8.19, Utrecht University, Department of EconomicGeography.
55. Nooteboom B., 2000, Learning and innovation in organizations and economies, Oxford, OxfordUniversity Press.
56. Nooteboom B., Van Haverbeke W., Duysters G., Gilsing V., van den Oord A., 2007, Optimal cognitivedistance and absorptive capacity, Research Policy 36: 1016-1034.
-
57. Ormerod P., 2005, Why most things fail. Evolution, extinction and economics, New York: PantheonBooks.
58. Paci R., Usai S., 1999. Externalities, knowledge spillovers and the spatial distribution of innovation.GeoJournal 49: 381–90.
-
59. Pack H., Saggi K., 2006, The case for industrial policy. A critical survey, World Bank Policy ResearchWorking Paper 3839.
60. Pinch S., Henry N., 1999, Paul Krugman’s geographical economics, industrial clustering and theBritish motor sport industry, Regional Studies 33: 815-827.
-
61. Polyani M., 1966, The tacit dimension, New York: Kegan Paul.
62. Quatraro F., 2010, Knowledge coherence, variety and economic growth. Manufacturing evidencefrom Italian regions. Research Policy, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.005
-
63. Raspe O., van Oort F.G., 2006, The knowledge economy and urban economic growth. EuropeanPlanning Studies 14: 1209-1234.
-
64. Robertson P. L., Langlois R. N., 1995, Innovation, networks and vertical integration. Research Policy24: 543–62.
-
65. Rodriguez-Pose A., Vilalta-Bufi M., 2005, Education, migration, and job satisfaction. The regionalreturns of human capital in the EU, Journal of Economic Geography 5: 545-566.
-
66. Saviotti P.P., 1996, Technological evolution, variety and the economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
67. Saviotti P.P., Frenken K., 2008, Trade variety and economic development of countries. Journal ofEvolutionary Economics 18(2): 201-218.
-
68. Saxenian A.L., 1994, Regional advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128.Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
69. Saxenian A.L., 2006, The new argonauts. Regional advantage in a global economy, Harvard UniversityPress, Cambridge.
70. Scott A.J., 1988, New industrial spaces. Flexible production, organization and regional developmentin North America and Western Europe, London: Pion.
71. Simmie J., Carpenter J. (eds.), 2007, Path dependence and the evolution of city regional development,Working Paper Series No. 197, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
72. Storper M., Walker R., 1989, The capitalist imperative. Territory, technology and industrial growth.New York: Basil Blackwell.
73. Strambach S., 2010, Path dependence and path plasticity: the co-evolution of institutions and innovation– the German customized business software industry, in: R. Boschma and R. Martin (eds.)The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 406-431.
74. Tanner A.N., 2011, The place of new industries. The case of fuel cell technology and its technologicalrelatedness to regional knowledge bases, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, no. 11.13,Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht (URU), University of Utrecht: Utrecht.
75. Todtling F., Trippl M., 2005, One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policyapproach, Research Policy 34: 1203-1219.
76. Torre A., Rallet A., 2005, Proximity and localization. Regional Studies 39 (1): 47-60.
-
77. Wenting R., 2008, Spinoff dynamics and the spatial formation of the fashion design industry, 1858-2005, Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 593-614.
-

Czasopismo/Seria/cykl:

Europa XXI

Tom:

22

Strona pocz.:

67

Strona końc.:

77

Format:

Rozmiar pliku 0,6 MB ; application/pdf

Identyfikator zasobu:

oai:rcin.org.pl:31085 ; 1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2012.22.5

Źródło:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; kliknij tutaj, żeby przejść

Język:

eng

Prawa:

Prawa zastrzeżone - dostęp nieograniczony

Zasady wykorzystania:

Zasób chroniony prawem autorskim. Korzystanie dozwolone w zakresie określonym przez przepisy o dozwolonym użytku.

Digitalizacja:

Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania Polskiej Akademii Nauk

Lokalizacja oryginału:

Centralna Biblioteka Geografii i Ochrony Środowiska Instytutu Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN

Dofinansowane ze środków:

Unia Europejska. Europejski Fundusz Rozwoju Regionalnego ; Program Operacyjny Innowacyjna Gospodarka, lata 2010-2014, Priorytet 2. Infrastruktura strefy B + R

Ta strona wykorzystuje pliki 'cookies'. Więcej informacji