RCIN and OZwRCIN projects

Object

Title: The EU cohesion Policy in Central and Eastern Europe, a Tool for Innovation?

Creator:

Lepesant, Gilles

Date issued/created:

2012

Resource type:

Text

Subtitle:

Europa XXI 22 (2012)

Publisher:

IGiPZ PAN

Place of publishing:

Warszawa

Description:

s. 11-64

Type of object:

Journal/Article

References:

1. Asheim B., 1995, Industrial Disctricts as “Learning Regions”. A Condition for Prosperity?, Studiesin Technology, Innovation and Economic Policy, Oslo, Université d’Oslo.
2. Aydalot P., 1987, Les technologies nouvelles et les formes actuelles de la division du travail, dans leDossier du Centre Économie Espace Environnement, 47.
3. Bafoil F., Beichelt T., 2008, L’Européanisation d’Ouest en Est, Paris, L’Harmattan, coll. Logiquespolitiques.
4. Bailly A., 2009, La science régionale en perspective, Géographie, économie, société, 11.
5. Barca F., 2009, Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-Based Approach to MeetingEuropean Union Challenges and Expectations, rapport indépendant préparé pour le compte deDanuta Hübner, commissaire européen en charge de la politique régionale, Bruxelles.
6. Barry F., 1999, Understanding Ireland’s Economic Growth, Basingstoke, Palgrave-Macmillan.
7. Blažek J., Uhlir D., 2007, Regional Innovation Policies in the Czech Republic and the Case of Prague:An Emerging Role of a Regional Level?, European Planning Studies, 15 (7).
-
8. Breathnach M., Kelly D., 1999, Multinationals, Subcontracting Linkages and the Innovative Performanceof Indigeneous Firms: Some Irish Evidence, document présenté lors de l’European Networkon Industrial Policy International Conference, Dublin, 9-10 décembre 1999.
9. Chandler A., 1990, Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge (Mass.),Harvard University Press.
10. Clarysse B., Muldur U., 2001, Regional Cohesion in Europe? An Analysis of How Public RTD SupportInfluences the Techno-Economic Regional Landscape, Research Policy, 30 (2).
11. Collins P., Pontikakis D., 2006, Innovation Systems in the European Periphery: The Policy Approachesof Ireland and Greece, Science and Public Policy, 33 (10).
-
12. Commission europeenne, 2009, European Commission Economic Forecast, Bruxelles, Commissioneuropéenne.
13. Crozet M., Lafourcade M., 2009, La Nouvelle Économie géographique, Paris, La Découverte, coll.Repères.
14. Crozier M., 1986, État modeste, État moderne. Stratégies pour un autre changement, Paris, Fayard.
15. Eurostat, 2007, Statistiques communautaires de l’innovation, Bruxelles, Eurostat, coll. Statistiquesen bref.
16. Eurostat, 2008a, Les Entreprises sous contrôle étranger dans l’UE, Bruxelles, Eurostat, coll. Statistiquesen bref.
17. Eurostat, 2008b, The Main Features of the EU Manufacturing Industry, Bruxelles, Eurostat, coll. Statisticsin focus.
18. Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Jacobson D., Robertson P.L., 2006, Low-tech Industries: Innovativeness andDevelopment Perspectives. A Summary of a European Research Project, Prometheus. CriticalStudies in Innovation, 24 (1).
19. Johnson B., Lundvall B., 1994, The Learning Economy, Journal of Industry Studies, 1 (2).
20. Ketels C., Sölvell Ö., 2006, Clusters in the EU-10 New Member Countries, Bruxelles, Commissioneuropéenne.
21. Lazonick W., 1991, Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy, Cambridge, CambridgeUniversity Press.
22. Lazonick W., 1992, Industry Clusters versus Global Webs, New York (NY), Columbia University,Department of Economics.
23. Lepesant G., 2009, Géographie de la crise en Europe centrale, Les Études du CERI, 159.
24. Lepesant G., 2001, Géographie économique de l’Europe centrale, Collection Références, Pressesde Sc-Po.
25. Liagouras G., 2010, What can we learn from the failures of technology and innovation policies in theEuropean periphery?, European Urban and Regional Studies.
-
26. Linden G., 1998, Building Production Networks in Central Europe: The Case of Electronics Industry,Working Paper, 126, Berkeley (Calif.), University of California, Berkeley Roundtable on theInternational Economy (BRIE).
27. Musyck B., Reid A., 2007, Innovation and Regional Development: Do European Structural Fundsmake a Difference?, European Planning Studies, 15 (7).
-
28. Raiser M., Haerfer C., Nowotny T., Wallace C., 2001, Social Capital in Transition: A First Look atEvidence, EBRD Working Paper, 61.
29. Rugraff É., 2010, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Supplier-Oriented Upgrading in the CzechMotor Vehicle Industry, Regional Studies, 44 (5).
-
30. Saint-Etienne C., 2009, Mobilisation des territoires pour contribuer à la croissance, Rapport àMonsieur le Président de la République, 29 juin 2009, Paris.
31. Siouti V., 2004, Lack of Money, Research Stops, Kyriakatiki Eleftherotypia, 4 April 2004.
32. Tödtling F., Trippl M., 2005, One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation PolicyApproach, Research Policy, 34 (8).
33. Veltz P., 2008, La Grande Transition. La France dans le monde qui vient, Paris, Seuil.
34. Veltz P., 1999, Territoires innovateurs: de quelle innovation parle t-on?, Revue d’économie régionaleet urbaine, 3.

Relation:

Europa XXI

Volume:

22

Start page:

37

End page:

49

Detailed Resource Type:

Article

Format:

File size 0,6 MB ; application/pdf

Resource Identifier:

oai:rcin.org.pl:31083 ; 1429-7132 ; 10.7163/Eu21.2012.22.3

Source:

CBGiOŚ. IGiPZ PAN, call nos.: Cz.6406, Cz.6407 ; click here to follow the link

Language:

eng

Rights:

Rights Reserved - Free Access

Terms of use:

Copyright-protected material. May be used within the limits of statutory user freedoms

Digitizing institution:

Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences

Original in:

Central Library of Geography and Environmental Protection. Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization PAS

Projects co-financed by:

European Union. European Regional Development Fund ; Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure

Access:

Open

×

Citation

Citation style:

This page uses 'cookies'. More information