Przegląd Geograficzny T. 86 z. 4 (2014)
The opening of borders in 2012 changed a great deal where Polish-Russian relations are concerned. Before 2012, contacts between the citizens of Poland and inhabitants of Kaliningrad District were limited, with the border separating them being more in the nature of a barrier and line of separation restricting contacts between the neighbouring countries. A border of this kind was obviously a factor contributing to the peripherisation of the Polish-Russian borderland. In the whole of 2009 there were only 1 million crossings of the border in question. However, in the wake of the July 27th 2012 entry into force of the agreement on a visa-free zone and local border traffi c, more and more Russians from the Oblast of Kaliningrad chose to start visiting areas within the zone on the Polish side, as there are attractive from the tourism point of view, as well as offering places to relax and do shopping. In 2013 the number of crossings of the Polish-Russianborder exceeded 6 million.The introduction of visa-free traffi c has thus resulted in massive infl ows into Poland of inhabitants of Kaliningrad, who mostly spend their time in the large shopping centres, supermarkets and grocery shops. However, some Kaliningraders also travel to participate in the largest mass events held in Poland’s Tri-city of Gdańsk, Gdynia and Sopot, and they are becoming more and more visible in the cityspace. There is no doubt that the high level of cross-border shopping activity and travel now has a key role to play in the economic development of the Polish borderland. While Polish citizens do not visit Kaliningrad as often as Russians visit Poland, they do make frequent crossings of the border to purchase Russian petrol, this being a wise decision given the fact that it is only around half as expensive. Overall, the opening of the border has led to a development of cross-border tourism, at the same time helping to improve relations between Poland and Kaliningrad Oblast, in line with a general willingness to learn and discover that is helping to gradually overcome stereotypes functioning within the neighbouring populations.Tourism is now therefore a popular activity for many people, and the development of the attendant infrastructure is proving very important for what are peripheral areas located in the borderland. This is in line with a general tendency for the type and level of openness of borders to exert a major infl uence on the nature and extent of the tourism capable of developing in their vicinity (Timothy, 2000).The main aim of this paper has thus been to present the infl uence of the opening-up of the border on the development of tourism in the Polish-Russian borderland.
1. Badanie obrotu towarów i usług na zewnętrznej granicy Unii Europejskiej na terenie Polski w IV kwartale 2013 roku, 2013, GUS, Warszawa-Rzeszów.
2. Banfi S., Filippini M., Hunt L.C., 2005, Fuel tourism in border regions: The case of Switzerland, Energy Economics, 27, s. 689-707.
3. Bank Danych Lokalnych; stat.gov.pl/bdl/ (7.07.2014).
4. Chojnicki Z., 1999, Uwarunkowania rozwoju regionu nadgranicznego – koncepcje i założenia teoretyczne, [w:] Z. Chojnicki (red.), Podstawy metodologiczne i teoretyczne geografii, Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań, s. 355-380.
5. Donnan H., Wilson T.M., 1999, Borders: Frontiers of Identity, Nation and State, Berg, Oxford-New York.
6. Hanson G.H., 1998, Regional adjustment to trade liberalization, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 28, 4, s. 419-444.
7. Informacja o turystach rosyjskich w Gdańsku w okresie 2012-2013, 2013, Referat Badań i Analiz Społeczno-Gospodarczych, Urząd Miasta Gdańsk.
8. Russian Friendly; http://www.russian-friendly.org.pl/index.php (1.04.1014).
9. Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1931/2006 Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 20 grudnia 2006 r. ustanawiające przepisy dotyczące małego ruchu granicznego na zewnętrznych granicach lądowych państw członkowskich i zmieniające postanowienia Konwencji z Schengen (Dz.U. UE z 2006 r. L 405).
10. Spierings B., Van der Velde M.R., 2007, Cross border shopping and the 'bandwith of familiarity'. Exploring the positive impact of national borders on consumer mobility in the Euregion Rhine-Waal, Working Paper Series, 2007/04, Nijmegen.
11. Spierings B.,Van der Velde M.R., 2008, Shopping, borders and unfamiliarity: consumer mobility in Europe, Tijdschriftvooreconomische en socialegeografie, 99, 4, s. 497-505.
12. Statystyki Straży Granicznej. Ruch graniczny na granicy polsko-rosyjskiej http://www.strazgraniczna.pl/wps/portal/tresc?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=pl/serwis-sg/polskie_formacje_graniczne/statystyki/ (1.04.2014).
13. Timothy D.J., 1995,Political boundaries and tourism: borders as tourist attractions, Tourism Management, 16, 7, s. 525-532.
14. Timothy D.J., 2000, Borderlands: An Unlikely Tourist Destination? IBRU Boundary and Security Bulletin, s. 57-65.
15. Timothy D.J., Tosun C., 2003, Tourists' perceptions of the Canada–USA border as a barrier to tourism at the International Peace Garden, Tourism Management, 24, s. 411-421.
16. Timothy D., J., Butler R.W, 1995, Cross-border shopping. A North American perspective, Annals of Tourism Research, 22, 1, s. 16-34.
17. Otok S., 2006, Geografia polityczna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
18. Umowa między Rządem Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej a Rządem Federacji Rosyjskiej o zasadach małego ruchu granicznego, Dz.U. 2012 nr 0 poz. 814.
19. Więckowski M., 2004, Przyrodnicze uwarunkowania się polsko-słowackich więzi transgranicznych, Prace Geograficzne, IGiPZ PAN, 195, Warszawa.
20. Więckowski M., 2010, Turystyka na obszarach przygranicznych Polski, Prace Geograficzne, IGiPZ PAN, 224, Warszawa.
File size 2,2 MB ; application/pdf
oai:rcin.org.pl:51260 ; 0033-2143 ; 10.7163/PrzG.2014.4.4
CBGiOS. IGiPZ PAN, sygn.: Cz.181, Cz.3136, Cz.4187 ; click here to follow the link
Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC 3.0 PL license
Copyright-protected material. [CC BY-NC 3.0 PL] May be used within the scope specified in Creative Commons Attribution BY-NC 3.0 PL license, full text available at: ; -
Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization of the Polish Academy of Sciences
Programme Innovative Economy, 2010-2014, Priority Axis 2. R&D infrastructure ; European Union. European Regional Development Fund
Mar 25, 2021
Feb 5, 2015
1665
https://rcin.org.pl/publication/70636
Studzińska, Dominika
Sagan, Iwona Kolosov, Vladimir Studzińska, Dominika Zotova, Maria Sebentsov, Alexander Nowicka, Klaudia
Więckowski, Marek (1971– )
Bar-Kołelis, Delia Wendt, Jan A
Więckowski, Marek (1971– ) Cyargeenka, Aliaksandr
Dombrowicz, Maria